1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name  | Mastery  | Learn  | Test  | Matching  | Spaced  | 
|---|
No study sessions yet.
subject-by-subject & across-subject counterbalancing
counterbalancing < (2&)
subject-by-subject counterbalancing
controls progressive error for each subject by presenting all treatment conditions more than once
subject-by-subject counterbalancing
disadvantage: longer time, expensive, or boring procedures
subject-by-subject counterbalancing
its disadvantages is compounded as the experimenter increases the number of treatments
reverse counterbalancing / block randomization
subject-by-subject counterbalancing < (2/)
reverse counterbalancing
subject-by-subject < administers treatments twice
reverse counterbalancing
subject-by-subject < ABBA
reverse counterbalancing
subject-by-subject < used for 2 levels only
block randomization
subject-by-subject < researchers assign each subject to several complete blocks of treatments
block randomization
subject-by-subject < used for 3+ levels
across-subject counterbalancing
presents each treatment ONCE and controls progressive error by distributing it across all subjects
complete & partial counterbalancing
across-subject counterbalancing < 2&
N factorial
complete counterbalancing AKA
complete counterbalancing
across-subject < uses all the sequences an equal number of times
complete counterbalancing
across-subject < determine how many possible sequences by using factorials (!)
(number of treatment conditions)!
partial counterbalancing
across-subject < we present only some of the (N!) orders
randomized partial & latin square counterbalancing
across-subject < partial counterbalancing < (2&)
randomized partial counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < used when there are 5+ treatment conditions
randomized partial counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < may not control for order quite effectively compared to complete counterbalancing
randomized partial counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < all the possible sequences are put in where the researcher could randomly pick from it and assign the picked sequence to a participant
randomized partial counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < subjects are assigned with randomly selected sequences
latin square counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < each treatment appears only once in any order in the sequences
latin square counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < done with 4 treatment conditions only
latin square counterbalancing
across-subject < partial < may have carryover effect