1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
market research
Market research is the systematic collection, collation, analysis and evaluation of information on the buyers and sellers in a market which is intended to assist the firm in the marketing process. Market Research reduces the risk of introducing new products or modifying existing products by seeing if they are likely to meet customer expectations.
The Reasons for Market Research.
To identify markets. This allows a firm to see if there will be a market and who their target market will be.
2. To gain a more detailed understanding of consumers’ needs – to discover consumers’ opinions on a huge range of issues. This can enhance communications and allow a business to understand better what consumers want.
3. To reduce the risk of product/business failure
4. To forecast future trends – Firms can then make the necessary adjustments to their product portfolios and levels of output in order to remain successful.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Primary Research.
Can aim questions directly at your research objectives.
Can gain the latest information from your marketplace and gain a competitive advantage.
Can find out why customers act in a particular way.
Only you have access to the results.
expensive
time consuming which is a problem in fast changing markets
needs other data to compare it with
inaccurate or biased
Advantages and Disadvantages of using Secondary Research.
quicker to complete than primary research
inexpensive
sources are available online so results can be checked for
accuracy
available to competitors
cannot verify the accuracy
may be out of date,
may be biased
may not be relevant to the Northern Ireland economy
Face To Face.
- Higher response rates and more accurate responses
Researchers can clear up misunderstandings
Gain views on a wide range of issues about the product
Helps the firm to improve customer experience in the future
Time consuming and expensive
Hidden bias in choice of respondents
Small sample reducing the validity of the results
Telephone Questionnaire.
Low cost
A business can cover a large geographical area so sample can be more
representative
People are sometimes more willing to answer questions over the telephone
A business can obtain the results much faster from a telephone survey
Negative reaction of respondents
Not everyone has a telephone or has their number listed so results are not
truly representative of the population
Telephone interviews are restrictive as you could not use images or
photographs of the product
Postal Questionnaire.
Low cost
Large geographical area can be covered
Respondents can research answers
No interviewer bias
Not sure who the respondent is
No one can clarify things
Low response rates
E-Survey.
Target specific individuals
The business could send it out and receive replies very quickly
The business would save money over printing and postage on traditional
questionnaires
It is very cheap to send out large numbers of questionnaires
Low response rates
Less secure
Sample may not be representative since not everyone has an e-mail account
or access to the internet
Advantages and Disadvantages of Questionnaires
Gain valuable information from the respondents to help make decisions
Cost Effective
Can gain quantitative and qualitative information depending on the questions
asked
Standardised format in that everyone gets asked the same questions
Dishonest answers
Low Response Rates
Inaccuracy in analysing open ended questions
focus groups
This is a form of qualitative research where a group of individuals are asked to share their views on a particular product or market. They normally contain between 6 and 10 people and are from the relevant market segments.
Results can be gained in a short period of time
Provide explanations as to why people respond in a particular way
This would help the business in the development of new products
This can be useful in helping the business to analyse why people prefer
particular things
It allows a business to enhance customer experience
Small scale so the results might not be representative
The business may have difficulty analysing results due to their qualitative
nature
Sometimes the results in a focus group can be biased depending on the
researcher who is leading the discussion or dominant members of the group.
The business needs to ensure researchers are properly trained.
Can be expensive
consumer panels
a group of people who form part of a market segment. They are asked to contribute thoughts and feelings about a product or service, in many cases through an interview process.
Used as a pilot for a full marketing campaign
Strong qualitative information
Members of the panel become confident and experienced
Time consuming and costly
Small scale therefore may not be representative
Results are difficult to analyse
test marketing
trialing a product on a section of the market before launching it onto the mass market. Results are reviewed carefully and extrapolated as representative of the population.
Reduces the chances of wasting resources
Provides valuable quantitative and qualitative information
Representative due to the geographical area used
Gives information to competitors
If it fails then it is time consuming and costly
Large expenditure has already been undertaken
Difficult to replicate the anticipated experience expected from the new
product/service when launched
interviews
This is similar to face-to-face surveys but involves pre-determined people. They are designed to gain qualitative rather than quantitative information.
Detailed qualitative research is gathered
In depth answers
Respondents are not influenced by others
Time consuming and expensive
Small samples therefore may not be representative
Interviewer bias could be a problem
observation
Customers are invited to sample/use a range of products/services that the business provides. The business then observes, notes and discusses the customers’ behaviour and responses in order to gain an in-depth analysis of their views.
It yields a ‘live’ experience
Accurate results
No bias
Inform a business what they should do in the future
Time consuming and expensive
Analysing results may be difficult
No interaction
Ethical considerations about not knowing you are being filmed
store loyalty cards
form part of a loyalty programme that a business may operate. Through consumer using their card the business can collect data and build customer profiles, enabling the business to better understand customer needs and buying behaviour.
Large quantities of accurate information
Trends can be identified so resources can be targeted
Easy to run
Encourages increased spending
Helps the business plan for the future
Expensive to set up
Expensive to run as the customer is expecting a reward
No qualitative information
surveys
A survey is a method of finding out a respondent’s view on a specific issue. It allows the business to gather information from target markets, with the aim of gaining a better understanding of the needs of the target audience.
It gives the business access to a wider range of information.
It is cheaper if it has been carried out by someone else.
The results obtained may not be entirely accurate due to the existence of bias
in the wording of questions.
random sampling
Samples are chosen from a population either by using a random number table or a random number generator. Each member of the population has an equal, independent and known chance of being selected.
Easy and quick to implement therefore benefit from first mover advantage
Free from bias
May be easier to carry out random, rather than quota sampling
Less information is required
Minority subgroups within the population may not be present in sample
Assumes that all customers are equally important so less useful when dealing
with products aimed at specific market segments
Can lead to bias if the sample set is not large enough to be representative of
the whole population. For example, customers sampled may all be male.
May need a larger sample to ensure that it is representative of the population
stratified sampling
The population is divided into subgroups based on specific characteristics, such as age, gender or race. Within the strata random sampling is used to choose the sample.
Strata can be proportionally represented in the final sample
It is easy to compare subgroups
Reduces selection bias
Information must be gathered before being able to divide the population into
subgroups
It is unusable when researchers cannot confidently classify every member of
the population into a subgroup
cluster sampling
Data is divided into clusters and random sampling is used to select whole clusters. It is usually used with naturally occurring groups of individuals for example classrooms or postcodes.
Cuts down the cost and time by collecting data from only a limited number of
groups.
Can show grouped variations
Don’t need complete population information
It is not a genuine random sample
The sample size is smaller and from thus the sample is likely to be less
representative of the population
Cluster sampling is much more complex to plan than other forms of sampling.
quota sampling
Quota sampling is a non-probability sampling technique in which researchers look for a specific characteristic in their respondents, and then take a tailored sample that is in proportion to a population of interest.
Relatively easy to administer
Can be performed quickly
Cost-effective
Results are more suited to the firm’s needs as those sampled are specifically
chosen. For example, according to socio-economic grouping.
The sample should be representative of a firm’s customer base
Useful where the proportions of the population with various characteristics are
known. A business may record customer detail when sales are made, to be used
later.
There is a potential for selection bias,
Can be very expensive as a business may have to employ a market research firm to carry out such a sample.
A business will find it time consuming as customers from each group must be found.
Samplers may be tempted to cut corners to speed up the process. As mentioned previously, it’s best for researchers to try to use stratified random sampling instead of quota sampling.