CH-16-Mental Health Services – Legal & Ethical Notes

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/39

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering major legal, ethical, and clinical concepts from the lecture on mental health law.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

40 Terms

1
New cards

Court‐ordered involuntary placement of a person with mental illness in a psychiatric facility when statutory criteria (e.g., danger, grave disability) are met.

Civil Commitment

2
New cards

Government authority to protect public safety, health, and welfare by restraining individuals who pose a threat to society.

Police Power

3
New cards

State’s authority to act as guardian for those unable to care for themselves, permitting involuntary treatment for their own good.

Parens Patriae

4
New cards

Court mandate requiring a person with severe mental illness to accept community‐based treatment as a condition for remaining in the community.

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT)

5
New cards

A statutory concept—often severe disturbances in thinking or mood that threaten health/safety—distinct from DSM clinical diagnoses.

Mental Illness (Legal Definition)

6
New cards

Likelihood that an individual will cause serious harm to self or others; key criterion in civil commitment decisions.

Dangerousness

7
New cards

Condition in which a person is unable to provide basic needs (food, shelter, medical care) due to mental illness.

Grave Disability

8
New cards

1960s–70s movement to close large state hospitals and treat patients in community settings.

Deinstitutionalization

9
New cards

Shift of individuals with severe mental illness from hospitals to other institutions such as jails, nursing homes, or shelters.

Transinstitutionalization

10
New cards

Confinement of individuals in a mental facility because they are unfit to stand trial or found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Criminal Commitment

11
New cards

Legal plea asserting lack of criminal responsibility owing to mental illness at the time of the offense.

Insanity Defense

12
New cards

Standard holding defendants not responsible if, due to mental disease, they did not know the nature or wrongfulness of their act.

M’Naghten Rule

13
New cards

Obsolete test stating an accused is not criminally responsible if the unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect.

Durham Rule

14
New cards

Insanity standard excusing defendants lacking substantial capacity either to appreciate wrongfulness or to conform conduct to law.

American Law Institute (ALI) Test

15
New cards

Doctrine reducing culpability when mental illness impairs the defendant’s ability to form criminal intent (mens rea).

Diminished Capacity

16
New cards

Verdict that absolves legal guilt and commits the defendant to a psychiatric facility until no longer dangerous or ill.

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI)

17
New cards

Verdict imposing a criminal sentence while acknowledging the defendant’s mental illness; treatment may occur before or during incarceration.

Guilty but Mentally Ill (GBMI)

18
New cards

Ability of a defendant to understand legal proceedings and consult rationally with counsel.

Competence to Stand Trial

19
New cards

Supreme Court case ruling that defendants incompetent to stand trial cannot be held indefinitely; must be treated, tried, or released.

Jackson v. Indiana (1972)

20
New cards

Responsibility placed on the defendant to demonstrate incompetence to stand trial (Medina v. California, 1992).

Burden of Proof for Incompetence

21
New cards

Legal obligation of therapists to breach confidentiality and protect identifiable third parties threatened by a client.

Duty to Warn (Tarasoff Rule)

22
New cards

Landmark case establishing clinicians’ duty to warn potential victims of foreseeable violence.

Tarasoff v. Regents (1976)

23
New cards

Qualified professional who offers specialized opinion testimony to aid the court (e.g., on diagnosis, risk, competence).

Expert Witness

24
New cards

Deliberate faking or exaggeration of symptoms for external gain, often evaluated with psychological tests like the MMPI.

Malingering

25
New cards

Legal philosophy that uses knowledge of behavior change to craft problem‐solving courts (e.g., drug, mental health courts).

Therapeutic Jurisprudence

26
New cards

Legal principle that persons involuntarily hospitalized are entitled to active efforts toward therapeutic goals (e.g., Wyatt v. Stickney).

Right to Treatment

27
New cards

Requirement to provide care in the setting that imposes the fewest constraints consistent with safety and treatment needs.

Least Restrictive Alternative

28
New cards

Patient’s legal ability to decline recommended therapies, especially psychotropic medication, unless overruled by court procedures.

Right to Refuse Treatment

29
New cards

Due‐process hearing allowing involuntary medication in prisons or hospitals if an individual is dangerous and treatment is in their interest.

Harper Hearing

30
New cards

Supreme Court decision limiting forced antipsychotic medication solely to render a defendant competent for trial.

Riggins v. Nevada (1992)

31
New cards

Participant’s voluntary agreement to treatment or research after receiving full disclosure of risks and benefits.

Informed Consent

32
New cards

Clinical decision making that integrates best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences.

Evidence‐Based Practice (EBP)

33
New cards

Systematic recommendations outlining effective interventions for specific disorders, based on evidence review.

Clinical Practice Guidelines

34
New cards

Guideline dimension assessing whether an intervention produces beneficial outcomes under controlled research conditions (internal validity).

Clinical Efficacy Axis

35
New cards

Guideline dimension evaluating feasibility, generalizability, and cost-benefit of interventions in real‐world settings (external validity).

Clinical Utility Axis

36
New cards

Specialized tribunals (e.g., drug, domestic violence, mental health courts) that integrate treatment mandates with judicial oversight.

Problem‐Solving Courts

37
New cards

Statutes permitting civil commitment of sexually violent offenders after prison if still deemed dangerous (e.g., Kansas v. Hendricks, 1997).

Sexual Predator (SVP) Laws

38
New cards

Case establishing minimum standards for staffing and environment in mental institutions and mandating active treatment.

Wyatt v. Stickney (1972)

39
New cards

Supreme Court ruling affirming residents’ rights to reasonable safety and freedom from undue restraint, leaving treatment decisions to professionals.

Youngberg v. Romeo (1982)

40
New cards

Federal law creating state agencies to investigate abuse/neglect and advocate for rights of people with mental illness.

Protection & Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act (1986)