Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
why have emotions?
adaptive and tied to specific behaviors
fear and survival responses
anger and defensive/attack responses
face of disgust is good for getting rid of toxic or spoiled food
facilitate decision-making in cases where time is short, information is lacking and options available are ambiguous
the ability to control emotions (emotional regulation) is related to mental health and job performance
physiology of emotion
in part through the autonomic nervous system
changes in organ function (heart rate, breathing, skin conductance)
effects are rapid and involuntary
person you love walks in the door and your heart starts beating fast, you didnt initiate that it happened involuntary
sympathetic (heart beat faster) vs parasympathetic (heart beat slower)
how many emotions are there?
varying theories (early estimates from 6 to 8 core emotions)
in the real world, the “pure” emotions are rare
most emotional expressions are likely hybrids
6 core emotional states (simple theory)
readily identifiable facial expressions
tell mood by face
things are more complicated than this
composites of the 6
like happy + sad: happy eyes, sad mouth
mixed states like bittersweet
these intersectional expressions are more common
emotions are innate
the facial and physical expressions accompanying emotion are generally consistent across cultures and do not require experience (biologically hard-wired)
similar expression in individuals who are blind
everyone makes similar and can tell the similar expressions
facial expressions are involuntary are associated with a different neural system (basal ganglia)
impaired in Parkinson’s disease
arise quickly
automatic emotional state like an uncomfortable smile
associated with a specific network
physical expressions are adaptive and could have been selected for over time
clenched fists in anger to prepare for a fight
wrinkling of nose in disgust
voluntary/involuntary expressions
‘fake smile’ (voluntary) from a ‘real smile’ (involuntary)
of the two muscles involved in a real smile (orbicularis oculi for the eyes + zygomaticus major for the mouth) one is difficult to contract voluntarily
in a fake smile, look at the eyes
different system, impaired by frontal cortex damage
lying
lying is associated w/many physical responses:
inappropriate smiling, nervous laughter, stiff upper body, infrequent nodding, less hand gestures, swinging feet, lack of eye contact
there is also verbal (“um” and “ah”) while trying to meet cognitive demands of lying
cannot multitask
lack of details in lies; cannot tell story backward in time
physiological changes (due to activation of the ANS) which can be measured via polygraph
certain state of arousal that goes with lying
the polygraph
at best, 80 - 88% accuracy
not fondly viewed by the legal community
many people show physiological changes just because theyre aroused
so called lie detector
maybe use an fMRI to predict lying
this isnt practical + so expensive
we dont have the data to support thats better either
theories on the origin of emotions
james-lange theory, cannon-bard theory, and modern view
james-lange theory
perception of environmental stimuli
feeling is an interpretation of unique physiological circumstances
if this were true, each emotion should have a unique physiological state that can be distinguished by the person
however, the physiology of most emotions is similar
cannon-bard theory
separate pathways by which we get emotional states and physiological responses
if this were true, emotion should be intact even if the ability to create physiological states was lost (eg spinal cord injury)
however, emotions are often reduced in intensity in such cases (particularly positive emotions)
the modern view
emotion is a product of complex, reciprocal influences of the brain, nervous system and perception on each other
what parts of the brain are important?
limbic system and amygdala
the limbic system
neural basis of emotion
collection of brain areas that are interconnected
lower order animals
been around for ages and increased in complexity
simple theory but good enough
the case of phineas cage
frontal cortex injury is associated w/ pronounced behavioral changes, such as impulsivity, inappropriate social behavior and irritability (quick to anger)
this suggested a role of the cortex in inhibiting emotion
the discovery of sham rage
cats in which the removal of the cortex were hostile to all stimuli
also supported a role of the cortex in inhibiting emotion
this behavior, termed sham rage, was absent in animals with hypothalamic damage
suggested a role of the hypothalamus in creating emotion
Kluver-Bucy syndrome
hyperorality, hypersexuality, repeated investigation of familiar objects and no fear
caused by damage to the anterior temporal lobe
removal of the amygdala alone generates similar symptoms
suggested a role of the amygdala in creating emotion
more arousal
hypothalamus and amygdala role
amygdala is early, hypothalamus is immediately after in creating emotion
frontal cortex role
regulating emotion
case study: amygdala lesion in SM
difficulty expressing fear and recognizing fear in others
processed facial expressions in others differently
predictable pattern of eye movements
eye - eye nose mouth and back up
people with amygdala damage dont show this same pattern
inappropriate social distancing
abnormal behaviors
the amygdala: more than just fear
many positive emotional states + experiences involve amygdala activation
the role is complex
be mindful of reverse inference errors in fMRI studies
unlearned (innate) fear in humans
some scientists have argued that humans have only a few innate fears (eg heights, loud noises, approaching objects, snakes + spiders)
this is the case for animals too
most scientists believe that the majority of our fears are learned
simple fear circuit
fast route AND a slow route
hippocampus is necessary for contextual fear conditioning
the amygdala is necessary for fear in general
mouse experiment
fear to the context (blue box) is more elaborate
needs hippocampus
fear to the tone (bell) is less elaborate
all forms of fear conditioning amygdala is necessary
the prefrontal cortex
adjustment to the circuitry to reflect the environmental circumstances
PFC in emotion (including fear)
connected to the amygdala; can inhibit it
can prevent learned fear and other emotions (emotion regulation)
connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex is plastic and modified by experience, particularly stress
the ‘loss’ of prefrontal cortex control can lead to a loss of control over emotions (emotional dysregulation)
can we ‘overcome’ learned fear?
yes! fear is not forever
some fears we acquire early in life can become impractical later
animals have a mechanism to limit the expression of fears that are no longer relevant
extinction is a gradual reduction in a CR (eg fear) to a CS (eg context) following repeated presentations of the CS alone (eg context w/no shock)
blue box with no shock hundreds of time, blue box is no longer associated with fear
extinction involves the PFC
neural mechanisms of extinction
in humans, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) may be critical to establishing extinction
extinction is not likely forgetting
but a form of learning wherein we suppress previously acquired behaviors
after extinction, part of fear remains
reinstatement, spontaneous recovery, renewal
reinstatement
one CS-UCS repairing brings back full CR
spontaneous recovery
time-dependent recovery of CR to CS (no CS-UCS repairing required)
renewal
extinguish CR to CS in one context (green box), still have CR to CS in other contexts (eg purple box)
stress
can be viewed as a feeling of tension resulting from the perception of demanding circumstances (stressors), we can view stress through a psychological or a physiological lens
what makes a stressor
Novelty - something new you have not experienced before
Unpredictability - something you had no way of predicting
Threat to the ego - your competence as a person is called into question
Sense of control - you feel you have little or no control over the situation
common stressors
many types, differ in severity and prevalence
according to this data, the major stressors are work, money and the economy
reasons can differ by year and by demographic
several studies suggest higher levels in Gen Z
stress levels and health
measured by multiple stress scales
Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)
Daily Hassle Scale (DHS)
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
stress is predictive of both physical and mental health
many psychological disorders are precipitated by or exacerbated by stressors
the most remarkable example is depression
risk is strongly related to frequency of stressors
cumulative stress
stressors add together
what if stress if frequent?
risk for mental disorders increases with the frequency of stressful life events, stressors are cumulative
changes in emotion w/stress
chronic stress in particular is associated with changes in emotion and risk for mental health disorders
part of the negative effects of chronic stress may be due to changes in the brain
many of the brain areas affected (hippocampus, amygdala and prefrontal cortex) are involved in emotional regulation and responding to stressors
chronic stress effects on neurons
here, the neurons of stressed animals show less branching (though the effects are complex and can vary)
the brain is vulnerable to stress, stress alters the stress network which leads to stress effecting you more in the future
starting with stress
stress —> hypothalamus —> pituitary gland —> adrenal gland —> cortisol (negative feedback loop)
as cortisol increases then it will shut off cortisol so it doesnt get too high
how does this inhibition of stress occur?
one area that may be involved: the hippocampus
controlling stress with glucocorticoid receptors
cortisol binds to GRs in hippocampal cells
GR-sensitive cells then prevent further cortisol release + terminate the stress response
lower GR expression prevents this stress regulation and increases anxiety
to reduce stress: more receptors is useful
hippocampus is effected by high levels of cortisol
chronic stress + cortical thinning
in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there is cortical thinning proportional to symptom severity
effects greatest on the frontal lobe + temporal lobe
more stress —> more thinning
hippocampus under stress
smaller in depression, size is negatively correlated w/number of depressive episodes and cortisol levels
animal model: social defeat
analogous to ‘bullying’, associated w/higher cortisol, lower testosterone, smaller testes + shorter lifespans
experiment: mouse high school model
take a small mouse and put it with a large mouse
fight will happen
small mouse will be afraid
put them in cages they cant touch but they can see each other
produces a stress response
higher cortisol, lower life spans
animal mode: CIS
CIS = chronic intermittent stress
most intense + popular model
depression
loss of interest or pleasure in activities normally enjoyed (eg anhedonia)
decreased energy (eg fatigue)
feelings of guilt or low self-worth
disturbed sleep, appetite and activity
inability to concentrate
thoughts of suicide
types of depression
unipolar depressive disorder
major depressive disorder (chronic)
major depressive episodes (acute but often recurrent)
biopolar disorder
post-partum depression
dysthymia
seasonal affective disorder
neural features of depression
brain region
hippocampus: volume decrease
orbitofrontal cortex: volume decrease, activity increase
anterior cingulate cortex: volume decrease
amygdala: activity increase
compound
5-HT/serotonin: concentration decrease
noradrenaline: concentration decrease
gamma-aminobtyric acid (GABA): concentration decrease
cytokines: concentration increase
cortisol: concentration increase
diagnosing depression
though depression has physiological and anatomical features, these features are not used in diagnoses
diagnosis requires a trained professional (eg doctor, psychologist, psychiatrist)
patient answers questions about their health
diagnostic criteria from the DSM are used
tests may be done to exclude other health problems (with similar symptoms (eg thyroid issues)
theories of depression
monoamine hypothesis
neurogenesis hypothesis
neuroendocrine hypothesis
neuroinflammation hypothesis
GABA/glutamate hypothesis
the monoamine hypothesis
decrease monoamine —> decrease mood
experimental depletion of 5-HT and other monoamine, produces depression-like behavior
low levels of monoamaine metabolites in depression
not seeing a lot of serotonin so we can assume serotonin levels are not as high
tryptophan depletion can trigger depression in vulnerable individuals
less serotonin being made in your brain
increased risk of depression
drugs for depression affect monoamine signalling
SSRIs
treating depression w/drugs
most drugs modify monoamine transmission
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOis)
tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)
problems with monoamine theory
antidepressants sometimes increase anxiety (so-called ‘jitterness syndrome’)
SSRIs are not always effective
~> 30% of patients do not respond to SSRIs
though SSRIs increase serotonin levels immediately, mood is not improved for weeks
serotonin alone is probably not the cause or the cure
drugs dont work for everyone so it cannot be the sole reason
more complicated than just assuming that a single thing explains depression
need for alternative theories
alternative SSRI mechanisms
one theory is that depression is not related to monoamine levels per se, but a secondary process triggered by monoamines
for example, SSRIs may improve mood by inducing monoamine-dependent remodeling of the brain
in particular, SSRIs might facilitate the production of new neurons in the brain (adult neurogenesis)
neurogenesis and depression
further evidence suggests that neurogenesis may be implicated in the behavioural response of animals to antidepressants
time course of neurogenesis aligns with time course for antidepressant efficacy (~4 - 6 weeks)
antidepressants facilitate hippocampal neurogenesis in animals
preventing hippocampal neurogenesis attenuates several behavioral effects of antidepressants
when you block neurogenesis, drugs dont work as well
one theory wont explain everything, they can cover parts though
treatment of depression
treatable in ~70 - 80% cases
main barrier is access to care (eg lack of funds, accessible professionals)
problem for less wealthy countries + low income individuals
another barrier is intent to seek help (both self + societal stigma)
common treatments include psychotherapy, cognitive behavioural theory and drugs (best for moderate/severe cases)
antidepressant controversy
ongoing debate about over-prescription (for off-label use and mild depression) and withdrawal
other methods of treatment for depression
transcranial magnetic stimulation
rapidly growing in popularity
quick, cost-effective
less side effects
ketamine
rapid effect, reserved fro severe cases
side effects not yet understood
newer
meditation
small effect, but accessible with few risks
for treatment-resistant cases of depression
electroconvulsive therapy
usually over frontal lobe
side effects include confusion + memory loss (largely transient)
cingulotomy
psychotherapy
very severe depression, irreversible, severely debilitating, no other option
removal of the anterior cingulate
also used in the treatment of OCD + pain disorders
deep brain stimulation has been suggested, but is not common
related to depression, we have…
anxiety is related to amygdala activity; damage to the amygdala profoundly affects anxiety
inhibiting the amygdala (ie w/GABA) reduces anxiety; increasing GABA activity may help treat anxiety
some anti-anxiety drugs increase GABA receptor activity, as does alcohol
however, the most commonly prescribed anti-anxiety drug uses a different pharmacological mechanism
bipolar disorder
episodes of depression and elevated mood
during elevated mood
the individual feels extremely energetic, happy and or irritable
they may experience reduced need for sleep and make poor decisions with little regard for consequences
~1% of the population
one of the most costly disorders worldwide (top 10)
economic costs estimated to be $45 billion in the US
freq results in absenteeism
risk of suicide and self harm is high
neural mechanisms poorly understood
BP and creativity
BP is more common in creative professionals + individuals with an arts education
the genes involved in creativity may also be linked to genes regulating mental health (genetic correlation)
bipolar disorder treatments
there are many possible treatments for bipolar disorder, including lithium, valproate, anticonvulsants and antipsychotics
lithium is probably the most commonly employed treatment with the best results for long-term use
mechanisms not well understood
schizophrenia
positive, negative and cognitive symptoms
prefrontal cortex and hippocampus affected
abnormalities in dopamine signalling
treated either with conventional antipsychotics or atypical antipsychotics
personality disorders
inflexible patterns of behavior that lead to distress in a wide variety of cases
emerge in adolescence with other personality traits
difficult to reliably diagnose
less researched than other conditions
borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)
psychopathic personality
includes a constellation of traits: guiltless, manipulative, charming, callous, self-centered
aware of problematic behavior
often poor self control and low empathy
research is difficult to do (privacy concerns), biased in nature (focuses on individuals who are incarcerated)
mechanisms of personality disorder
argued to be a form of NDD
early trauma/exposure to violence + brain damage (OFC) and poor parental relationship are risk factors
genetic risk factors also exist
personality disorders and psychopathic traits are heritable
MAO (warrior gene) and 5-HTTLPR (serotonin) may be involved
brain changes in ASPD:
reduced function, volume and connectivity in the FC + amygdala
low arousal theory
inappropriate ANS reactivity
chronic state of “stimulus hunger” (characteristic of ADHD, may be involved in ASPD)
indicators of emotional state abnormal in ASPD
low resting heart rate and electrodermal activity
abnormal response to threatening stimuli
back off vs fight response
may affect inability to learn from punishment