1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Brightness gain review
Brightness gain achieved by minification is equal to the area of the input phosphor to the area of the output phosphor, resulting from the increased electron density and corresponding increased light intensity at the output phosphor
Advantages of i.i. over FPD is this brightness gain (vs binning)
Flux gain and minification gain are directly proportional
50 to 75 times more electrons than those that entered the input phosphor 5000:1 gain
Flux gain =
Number of output light photons / Number of input x-ray photons
Flux Gain
The # of photons generated at the output phosphor for every photon generated at the input phosphor
The flux gain results from the acceleration of photoelectrons to a higher energy so that they generate more fluoroescent photons at the output phosphor
Minification
The concentration of electrons onto an output phosphor much smaller than the input phosphor
Minification gain
Measured as the ratio of the input phosphor area to the output phosphor are
Concentration of electrons to a smaller area
analogy of focusing of the sun heat through a magnifying glass causing intense heat on the other side
Minification Gain =
input phosphor diameter ² / output phosphor diameter ²
Conversion Factor
Radiation intensity incident on the input phosphor
Measured in mR/s
Approximately 0.01 (1%) times the brightness gain
Quantity for expressing image intensification
50 to 300
Conversion Factor =
Output Phosphor illumination (cd/m²) / Input exposure rate (mR/s)
Importance of Concave Shape of Input Phosphor and Photocathode
Travel distance of electrons must be the same to the output phosphor
Minimizes vacuum stress
(curved - to reach point at same time to form image)
i.i. Issues
Image lag - blurred images
Burnout
Blooming - Caused by the input of signals to the video camera that exceed its Dynamic Range
Reduce with collimation
No Longer a problem in CCD and CMOs Systems
Saturation (black out)
Noise
Image lag in angiography would be …
Detrimental
Blooming
Saturation would be white on digital subtraction image in IR or Black bone images
Fluoroscopic Image Noise
The emission of light causing noise
Noise patterns appears to be drifting across the image, creating the appearance of “crawling ants” or “snow”
Can be improved some by increased conversion efficiency in the image intensifier, but since the primary cause is an insufficient flux or exposure rate, the best solution is to raise the mA (tube Current)
Fluoroscopic Image Contrast
Image intensifiers are generally poor at preserving high contrast in the transmitted image
Some x-rays pass through the input phosphor all the way to the output phosphor, causing it to glow with random fog - like brightness
Light from the output phosphor can also travel backward to the photocathode, causing it to emit additional electrons in a random pattern
These effects are destructive to image contrast
Contrast deteriorates with aging of the intensifier - deterioration can be as high as 10% per year
Pincushion Distortion
Slight magnification and increased blur around the periphery of the image, caused by projecting the image from a curved input phosphor to a flat output phosphor
Operation in magnification mode yields a sharper image because the most extreme curvature of the input phosphor at the periphery is eliminated
From a 25cm diameter to a 10cm diameter, resolution can be increased as much as 50%, from 4 LP/mm
Veiling Glare
Scattered random light from the output phosphor (a haze over the image)
Contributing factors include both scattered electrons passing up through the image intensifier
Degrades apparent image contrast
Can be tested for by placing a lead disc in the middle of the fluoroscoped image, and checking for any light emission in the central portion of the disc image, which should be black
LOW GLARE =
High Contrast
HIGH GLARE =
Low Contrast
FPD Eliminates …
Veiling glare artifacts
Vignetting
Loss of brightness toward the periphery of the image
A contributing factor is pincushion distortion
Also can occur in optical lenses between the image intensifier and any attached recording device, due to normal scattering of light
Can be tested for by observing a “flat-field” fluoroscoped image, with no object or with a homogeneous object in the beam
Take a spot film of nothing
S Distortion
Straight Objects appear curved
Due to an external magnetic field
DO NOT place i.i. Fluoroscopy rooms in close proximity to your MRI room nor steel support structures
FPD Issues
Detector cannot acquire another image until all the data is read on current one
Not all of the information/charge is removed all the time… ghosting may occur
Pixeled image due to binning
All dexels have different sensitivity – not consistent
Pixel Gain (Volume averaging)
Unresponsive dels, or pixels
Data line drop off
Loss of spatial resolution with binning