1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Sapir-Whorf thesis
People perceive the world through the cultural lens of language
Current view
Language does not determine reality.• People can imagine new ideas or things before devisinga name for them.
Individualistic
cultures value personal success and independence (e.g., the U.S. or many Western countries)
Collectivist
cultures emphasize group harmony and shared responsibility (e.g., China, Guatemala, Pakistan
High-context
cultures rely more on indirect communication, body language, and the context of a situation (e.g., Japan, Arab cultures).
Low-context
cultures focus more on direct, clear verbal communication (e.g., Germany, the U.S.).
Masculine
cultures value competitiveness, assertiveness, and achievement (e.g., Japan).
Feminine
cultures prioritize care, quality of life, and cooperation (e.g., Sweden).
Centralized
power means decision-making is controlled by a few people at the top (e.g., autocratic governments
Decentralized
power distributes decision-making across more people or levels (e.g., democratic countries)
High-ambiguity
cultures are comfortable with uncertainty and change (e.g., Greece, Portugal, Serbia).
Low-ambiguity
cultures prefer clear rules and predictability.
Short-term
orientation values immediate results and traditions (e.g., the U.S.).
Long-term
orientation focuses on planning for the future, persistence, and long-term goals (e.g., China).
Five-StageModel of the Listening Process
Receiving, responding, understand, evaluating, remembering
Responding
answering and giving feedback
Receiving
hearing and attending
understanding
learning, deciphering, meaning
Remembering
recalling and retaining
Evaluating
judging, criticizing
types of communication
Active listening and verbal communication
Active listening
extremely attentive, with good eye contact and body language, and encourage the other person to continue talking.
Verbal communication
the spoken exchange ofthoughts, feelings, orother messages.
Bypassing
Misunderstanding can occur when words have multiple meanings
Lack of precision
Incorrect or unclear language can easily foster miscommunication
Overgeneralizing
Sweeping generalizations imply that evidence has been collected to reach adefinitive conclusion, when in reality this is probably not the case.
Static evaluation
Some people make statements that do not allow for change
Polarization
This refers to ignoring the middle ground, or seeing the word in black andwhite
Biased language
Words that reflect biases about race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation,religious faith, or other cultures can foster miscommunication.
Women's Patterns
More likely to use conversation as a way to establish and maintain relationships• Prefer side-by-side interactions• Smile/hold eye-contact more often• Occupy less personal space
Men's Patterns
Approach communication from content orientation
• Approach communication as an exchange of information
• Speech is more instrumental and less likely to convey feelings or
emotions.
Conflict
occurs when members of the group disagree over two o rmore options to make a decision, solve a problem, or achieve a goal
Pseudoconflict
A misunderstanding where both parties think they disagree, but they actually don't. It happens because of poor communication or misinterpretation.
Content Conflict
Disagreements about facts, information, or specific issues. For example, arguing over which movie to watch or where to go for dinner.
Value Conflict
Disagreements based on deeply held beliefs or values. For example, arguing about moral or ethical issues, like different opinions on religion or politics.
Ego Conflict
When conflicts become personal and people defend their self-image or identity. This type of conflict is often fueled by emotions, and it can make it hard for people to resolve the disagreement rationally.
Avoiding
This is when you ignore or withdraw from the conflict, hoping it will go away on its own. You don't address the issue directly.
Accommodating
In this style, you give in to the other person's wishes or needs, even if it means sacrificing your own. It's about keeping the peace.
Competing
Here, one person tries to win at all costs. It's a more aggressive approach, where you focus on getting your own way and may not consider the other person's needs.
Compromising
This is when both sides give up something to find a middle ground. It's a balanced approach, but neither side gets everything they want.
Collaborating
In this style, both sides work together to find a solution that satisfies everyone. It's a win-win approach, where you focus on understanding each other's needs and finding a creative solution.
Power
the ability to exercise your will over others
Personal Power
the degree of autonomy a person has to exercise his or her will
Social Power
ability to exercise your will over another person
Intimate Partner Power
sometimes known as conjugal power• This type of power involves decisions making among intimatepartners, their division of labor, and their sense of entitl
Coercive power
based on the ability to achieve your will by force
Reward power
based on the ability to achieve your by offering rewards
Expert power
stems from a person's special knowledge or ability
Informational power
comes from the information that a person may use to persuade another
to do something
Referent power
stems from the emotional identification of the less dominant persontoward the more dominant person.
Legitimate power
based on a person's claim of authority or right to exercise his or her will
Resource Theory
he spouse with the most prestigious or higher paying job can use that advantage to generate more power in the relationship
Principle of Least Interest
The partner with the least commitment to the relationship has the most power.
Relative Love and Need Theory
suggests that love itself is feminized, defined, and interpreted
Doing Gender
suggests that we take power differentials among men and womenfor granted and continue to reproduce them.