1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
• Spit = long narrow ridge of sand/shingle attached at one end, extending into the sea or across an estuary (e.g. Spurn Point, Humber)
• Longshore drift moves sediment along the coast
• Where the coast changes direction (bend, river mouth) sediment carries on straight → deposited in sheltered, shallow water (waves lose energy)
• Ridge builds above sea level + grows in length • Behind the spit: sheltered → salt marsh/mudflats
• Hook: secondary wind/wave direction, or waves refracting round the tip, change the direction of drift → sediment deposited in a curve
Spit doesn't close the estuary: river flow + tidal currents remove sediment at the mouth
• Salt marsh: sheltered, low-energy water behind the spit → fine silt/clay deposited (mudflats) → salt-tolerant plants (samphire, cord grass) trap silt → surface builds above the tide
• Groynes: wood/rock barriers at right angles to the beach trap longshore drift sediment → wider beach. + relatively cheap, tourism. - starve downdrift beaches → more erosion there (e.g. Mappleton, Bournemouth)
• Gabions: wire cages of rocks at the cliff base. + cheap, easy, plants grow through. - short-lived (cages rust), weak against big waves, unsightly
• Revetments: sloping wood/concrete barriers absorb wave energy. + cheaper than sea walls. - costly vs soft engineering, need maintenance (e.g. Blackpool)
• Nourishment: sand/shingle added (dredged offshore) → bigger beach absorbs energy. + natural, tourism, cheaper. - repeated regularly, dredging harms seabed, less effective in severe storms (e.g. Bournemouth)
• Dune regeneration: plant marram grass + fence off → roots stabilise sand, dunes absorb wave/wind energy. + cheap, sustainable, habitats. - not for cliffs, ongoing management, damaged by storms/visitors (e.g. Sefton Coast, Formby)
• Cliff stabilisation: regrade slope, drainage, vegetation → less weight + lubrication → less mass movement. - expensive, doesn't stop undercutting
• Different priorities: residents + businesses want protection; councils + Environment Agency have limited budgets + use cost-benefit, NIMBYISM + tourism
environmental groups prefer soft engineering/managed retreat; landowners resist losing land
• Climate change: sea level rise (thermal expansion + melting ice) → waves reach further up the coast; more frequent, intense storms → larger destructive waves + storm surges → more erosion + flooding
• Hard: strong, long-lasting protection where value is high (towns, roads, industry); but expensive, unnatural, disrupts sediment, encourages risky development, may not be sustainable with sea level rise → best in densely populated or economically important areas
• Soft + managed retreat: work with nature, cheaper, natural-looking, habitats, sustainable; but need repeating, less protection in severe storms, retreat = land/property loss + controversial → best where less valuable land is at risk; often combined with hard enginee