1/14
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
No one expected Henry tudor to become King of England - explain why
KEY FACTOR: NOBILITY
Successes
Prioritising men of ability
In council Bray, Fox, Morton (lawyers and accountants)
Prioritising men of ability locally as JPs
Acts of Attainder
50 at the start and 50 at the end of his reign
Surrey had an AoA for not supporting H at Bosworth. He was rewarded with Lueitenant in the North
Bonds & Recognisances
Marquis of Dorset
Reversing them more
Over half of noble families were in B&R
Number of nobility 50 - 35
Exerting feudal rights
Making nobility pay more frequently such as for marrige or wardship, inheritance
Act of Resumption (1486) to get back crown lands
Using order of the Garter to reward & limiting use of patronage
Faliures
Retaining
Lord Burgavenny fined for illegal retaining £70,000
Chose not to reduce influence
Courtneys, Dacres, Stanleys
Benifitted him more not to reduce their powers
Kildare
Attempted to replace him with Poynings but this failed so had to reinstate him
Not good as Kildare crowned Simnel in Ireland
KEY FACTOR: CLAIMANTS
Edward Earl of Warwick
Most direct claimant for the thone
10 years old, not much of a threat but used as a puppet for powerful people.
Imprisoned from 1485. However his imprisonment gave Simnel the opportunity to become a pretender
1499 executed for plotting with Warbeck
John De la Pole (Earl of Lincoln)
Named heir by RIII
Made part of the King’s council to please his family
Fled with Lovell to Margaret’s court on its way to Ireland to support Simnel
Killed in Battle of stoke
Edmund de la Pole (Suffolk)
1499 - Flees to Calais with Richard, trying to plot against the Yorkists
1501 - Flees again to Maximillian after being brought back
Finally handed over in the Treaty of Windsor 1506
Richard de la Pole
Fleeds with Edmund, is still active by the time H dies
Last surviving Yorkist claimant
KEY FACTOR: PRETENDERS
Simnel
1847
Needed Battle of stoke to get rid of him: could have easily gone the other way
Warbeck
Caused H to make lots of international treaties
Trade Embargo on Burgundy
Medina Del Campo
Treaty of Etaples
KEY FACTOR: SPAIN
— 3 key moments —
How are relations with England?
Treaties made?
Was Henry’s policies successful?
Treaty of Medina Del campo (1489)
Marrige between C & Arthur
Agree not to support pretenders
Advantages for Eng trade
Issues after Isabella’s death (1504)
Fer wants control, so does Phillip (husband to Isabella’s daughter)
Phillip expects H support as he had Suffolk
Ferdinand called off the marrige alliance (reluctant while W threatens H’s stability) & makes friends with France
Tension, H debated getting a different marrige
Treaty of Windsor (1506)
Hand over Suffolk, as long as he isn’t killed
Acknowledge P & J as ruler of castille
Malus Intercursus, points not enforced
Marrige between H & Margaret of Savoy (Phillip’s sister)
Successful in marrige between C & A but goes down hill after A dies and uncertainty about who will rule Castille. H fails to secure marrige for himself but Treaty of Windsor is very successful.
KEY FACTOR BURGANDY & HRE
Who opposed H’s rule? Why?
Margaret
Yorkist, EIV’s sis
Suppots Simnel - harbours Lincoln & Lovell
Margaret of Burgundy caused lots of tension as she supports W - giving mercenaries & money
Maximillian
untrustworthy, supported W
Trade Embargo (1493-96)
Showed how H valued security over trade
Maguns Intercursus to restore trade, B was Eng’s main trade partner
Reducing the powers of the Hanseatic league - took him a long time
KEY FACTOR: FRANCE + BRITTANY
Before reign
Charles VIII harbours H for 14 years
H gains support in France
Charles VIII Sends mercanaries
Intial peace treaty with F, extended to 1489
1487 - French invade Brittany
1489
Raises army against France to support Brittany
Treaty of Redon to support B independance
1492 - sends an army to F
1492 - Warbeck in F
Treaty of Etaples (1492)
Not to harbour rebels
Pension
KEY FACTOR: SCOTLAND
Historic tensions
1486 - Three year truce
1495 - James harboured Warbeck, he married James’s sister
1487 - Invasion of Eng, led to Cornish rebellion as H was trying to raise taxes
1497 - Truce of Ayton
S wouldn’t harobur rebels
BUT James didn’t abandon his auld alliance with F
1502 - Treaty of Perpetual Peace
Margaret married James IV
KEY FACTOR: TRADE
Reduced the powers of the Hanseatic League
Restored their powers to get on their side first
Slowly reduced them
Had to give back their powers to entice Edmund (Suffolk) away
Rebellions were the greatest challenge facing Henry’s rule 1485 - 1509. Assess the validity of this view.
R - wen’t the most serious as H actions
Rebellions - serious but H dealt with it
Lovell & Stafford (1486) In Yrk & Midlnd (RIII supp) BUT pardon to drain support. L&S imprisoned
Y & C Unhappy with taxation - ch as H struggles to raise funds for war
Yorkshire (1489) Earl of N killed (supp at BoB)
Cornish (1497) Most serious threat, went to blackheath,
BUT H actions minimised the ch:
C - leaders executed, fines for all involved
Y - made Surrey L in N.
Pretenders - H usurper =need to secure dynasty. They gave a figurehead for rebellions
Simnel (1847) Warwick, serious battle of Stoke.
Warbeck (1490s) challenging due to f.p - Margaret & trade ban, gave power to the Scottish to launch a rade (this led to the Cornish rebelion)
W gains support from Stanley, trade embargo
Claimants
Ed (Warwick) next strongest claim to the throne. imprisoned in T of L this gave the opp to Simnel to pretend to be him executed 1499. Not much of a threat as he was 10 but was a puppet for powerful people
John de la pole, supported Warwick. Named heir by RIII. invited into royal council but flees
Richard &Edmund last surviving heirs
(Suffolk) handed over in treaty of Windsor (1506)
Foriegn relations (see doc for details)
Brittany
Spain - Catherine of Aragon
France
Scotland
Burgundy - trade ban
‘In the years 1485 – 1499 Henry successfully secured his position on the English throne. ‘ Assess the validity of this view.
YES - Dealing with Claimants/Pretenders
YES & NO- Dealing with Nobility
YES & NO- f.p
Spain - Sec through marrige alliance with Cath but Arthur died. Isabella’s death caused conflict between her husband and daughter over who would rule Castile . This led to tense Eng/Sp relations - Fer made an alliance with Fr
Burgundy- trade ban due to Marg supporting Warbeck, but Magnus Intercursus
Henry’s success in establishing the dynasty was almost entirely due to the fact that he was a ruthless and brutal tyrant. Assess the validity of this view.
YES - dealing with reb
Executed Warwick 1499
Executed leaders of C rebellion
Nobility
AoA & B&R
NO
Rewarded loyal supporters - Earl of Oxford, Jasper Tudor
Incentives - Order of the Garter,
Invited JohnDLP to be on the council
Surrey allowed to be L in the N
Rebellions in the reign of Henry VII stemmed mainly from the weakness of central government. Assess the validity of this view.
Yes - rebellions due to taxation
taxing places that poor compated to the prosperous South East
Social discontent led to local protests but because the crown failed to react they turned into full rebellions
Yorkshire (1489) EoN was killed, resented being taxed and governed by southerners, rebellion in the North as they felt it was nothing to do with them
Cornish (1497) serious, taxes to resists Warbecks invasion again they felt it was nothing to do with them,
Yes - key people
Stanley - invited into Henry’s council
Lincoln - invited into Henry’s council
No - Resisitence of Henry VII
‘Henry VII successfully achieved his aims in foreign policy 1485 – 1509.’ Assess the validity of this view.
YES but he did have to compromise trade at points to ensure security
SECURITY
Trade ban on Burgundy
WEALTH
Trade ban on Burgundy
Magnus Intercursus
Malus Intercursus
Increase cloth trade by 60%
INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION/ MARRIGE
Fer wants control, so does Phillip (husband to Isabella’s daughter)
Phillip expects H support as he had Suffolk
Ferdinand called off the marrige alliance (reluctant while W threatens H’s stability) & makes friends with France
Tension, H debated getting a different marrige
Henry’s consolidation of power during his reign was the result of his own personal strengths. Assess the validity of this view. - Written
Henry’s consolidation of power was mostly due this his own personal strengths as a capable ruler who created a good balance of punishments and rewards to ensure loyalty. He was finacially capable and was able to make deals with foreign powers to increase his presitige. However, he also knew when to use other people to benefit him - able concillors and foriegn powers.
PARA 1: Personal strengths - Political shrewdness & asserting feudal rights
Predating reign, crowned before marrige & parliament met, rewarding loyal supporters (Earl of Oxford & Jasper Tudor put in King’s council)
BALANCE: he still relied on these people helping him before and during his reign
Control over nobility - appointing men of ability to help him, HE passed AoA - reversing some of them (Surrey) B&R (Marquis of Dorset fined £1,000)
BALANCE: Asserting feudal rights through the Council Learned (empson and dudley) and Star Chamber although he set these up
PARA 2: Financial aptitude
Exchequer system, customs duties, trade benefits, pensions from France
HOWEVER: Rebellions caused by taxation, trade embargo
PARA 3: FOREIGN POLICY
Avoids expensive wars
Marrige alliances
Strengths as a diplomat underpinned his conduct of f.p
Treaty of Medina Del Campo (1489)
Truce of Ayton (1497)