1/95
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Occupational Performance
Primary outcome of ecological models
Determined by the person, environment, and occupation
Values and Interests
Skills and Abilities
Life Experiences
Variables of the Person component in the ecological models
Physical
Cultural
Social
Temporal
Components of Environment in the ecological models
Activities
Observable behaviors of the PEO model
Tasks
purposeful activities of the PEO model
Occupations
self-directed tasks a person engages in over the life course (PEO model)
Actions
basic units of tasks (PEOP model)
Tasks
combination of actions with a common purpose (PEOP model)
Occupations
goal-directed, meaningful pursuits that typically extend over time (PEOP model)
Task
the term facilitates interdisciplinary collaboration
objective representation of all possible activities
EHP model
Outcome
confluence of the person, environment, and occupation
relies on the goodness of fit
Person-Environment-Occupation Model
goodness of fit increases → occupational performance increases
The goodness of fit is always fluctuating
OTs will adjust the factors to promote occupational performance
Person-Envioronment-Occupation-Performance Model
goodness of fit increases → occupational performance increases
Person factors = intrinsic, environmental factors = extrinsic
Performance is a separate factor from Occupation
Ecology of Human Performance Model
person is within a given context
includes all possible tasks available for a person, but they can only do those within the performance range
Establish or Restore
develop and improve skills and abilities
Adapt or Modify
change environment or tasks to increase performance rate
Alter
do not change person, task, or environment
simply design to make a better fit
Prevent
change the course of events when a negative outcome is predicted
Create
do not assume that a problem has occured or will occur
Designed to promote performance in context
Relationship between people, environment, and occupations are dynamic and unique, interacting continually across space and time.
Environment is a major factor in occupational performance that may facilitate or inhibit it.
It is more efficient to change the environment or find better person-environment fit.
Occupational performance is determined by confluence of PEO
Assumptions of the Ecological Models
Begins by identifying what occupations a person wants or needs using the top-down approach
Involves promoting self-determination and inclusion of people with disabilities
Service recipient is the primary decision maker
Assumptions of OT Practice
Client-centered approach
Overarching value of the Ecological Models
Model of Human Occupations
Developed in 1980 by Kielhofner and Berg
Most used occupation-based model in OT
Occupation-focused, theory-driven, client centered
how people experience their area of concern/impairment
Occupational behavior approach by Mary Reilly
Gary Kielhofner et al. General Systems Theory
Theoretical antecedents of the MOHO
Occupational Behavior Approach by Mary Reilly
focused on activities that occupy time, produce achievement, and sustain the individual
Focused on the disruptions in occupational functioning
Based on:
Developmental theory
Achievement theory
Role theory
Gary Kielhofner et al. General Systems Theory
Explain sets of interrelated concepts
When input is altered, the through-put is different, and produces a different output
Feedback is given based on the input to operate better the next time
Volition
Motivation
Process by which people are motivated toward and choose what activities they do
It may be because of personal causation, value, or interests
In the prcocess of:
Thinking of what to do
Choosing which occupation to do
Experiencing occupation
Evaluating the experience
MOHO
Personal Causation
Thoughts and feelings about one’s abilities and effectiveness as they do everyday activities
how they feel doing an occupation
MOHO
Values
Beliefs and commitments about what is good, right, and important to do
meanings ascribed to what they do
MOHO
Interests
developed through the experience of pleasure and satisfaction derived from occupational engagement
MOHO
Habitutation
people organize actions to patterns and routines
MOHO
Habits
involve learned ways of doing things that unfold automatically
MOHO
Roles
cultural script for one’s identity
provide a set of responsibilities and obligations that are associated with that identity
MOHO
Performance Capacity
underlying mental and physical abilities or capacities and how they are used and experienced in occupational performance
MOHO
Environment
Physical, social, cultural, economic, and political features within a person’s context that influence motivation, organization (habituation), and performance of occupation
Includes objects, spaces, tasks, social groups
MOHO
Volition, Habituation, Performance Capacity
Person factors of the MOHO
Particiopation, Performance, Skills
Dimensions of doing of MOHO
Occupational Participation
Engaging in occupations that are part of one’s sociocultural context and that are desired or necessary to well being
MOHO
Occupational Performance
Doing a task related to participation in a major life area
MOHO
Skills
Goal-directed actions a person uses while performing
Motor, process, communication and interaction
MOHO
Occupational Identity, Competene, and Adaptation
Output of MOHO
Occupational Identity
sense of who people are and who they wish to become as occupational beings
generated from experience
MOHO
Occupational Competence
Degree to which poeple are able to sustain a pattern of doing that enacts their occupational identity
MOHO
Occupational Adaptation
creation of occupational identity and ability to enact this in various circumstances
MOHO
Generating questions
Gathering information
Theory-based explanation
Generating goaks and strategies
Implementing and monitoring
Determining outcomes
Therapeutic reasoning of MOHO
Theory of Occupational Adaptation
basis for a doctoral program in OT at the Texas Women’s University
Describes occupation and adaptation
Adaptation through occupation
occupation could be adaptive, maladaptive or non-adaptive
Spiraling process of development
Influences within and outside of the person interact to promote occupation and thereby to achieve adaptation
Theory of spatio-temporal adaptation
Spiraling process of development
skills are learned in response to stimuli in the environment
Dynamic Model of Occupation
external demands, occupational performance, and adaptation formed a continuous interactive loop
Adaptation as a development process that responds to environmental challenges constantly evolving skills and aptitudes
Adaptation through occupation
Theory of spatio-temporal adaptation
Model of Human Occupation
Dynamic Model of Occupation
Theoretical Antecedents of TOA
More adaptive = more functional
Competence in occupation is a lifelong process to internal and external demands
Demands to perform naturally occur
Dysfunction occurs becauyse the person’s ability to adapt has been challenged
The person’s adaptive capacity can be overwhelmed by impairment
Greater dysfunction = greater demand for changes
Success in occupational performance = ability to adapt with sufficient mastery
Theoretical assumptions of TOA
Desire for mastery
innate within the human condition to master the environment
Person factor
TOA
Demand for mastery
expectations from the environment
impact and is impacted by the person
Occupational Factor
TOA
Press for Mastery
interaction of internal and external factors
TOA
Occupational Role expectations
response to the unique occupational challenge experienced by the individual
TOA
Occupational response
action done by the individual in response to the occupational challenge
TOA
Generation
Individuals assess existing repertoire of adaptive if there is a suitable response available, if existing response can be modified, or if a new response must be learned
TOA
Hyperstable
same solution
adaptive response behavior
TOA
Hypermobile
move solutions with no result
adaptive response behavior
TOA
Blended
greater opportunity for positive outcome
adaptive response
Adaptation Gestalt
Individual configures their person systems to carry out a plan
Drawn from individual’s experiences
TOA
Evaluation
activated to evaluate the chosen response option in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction to self, satisfaction to society
TOA
Relative Mastery
desired outcome of therapy
how the client feels when they were able to adapt to their contexts
TOA
Integration
Integrates and stores positively evaluated response options for future use
Discards negatively rated response options
Built and refined through feedback
TOA
Canadian Model of Occupational Performance
Carl Rogers in 1940
Social Learning theory
Adaptation and human's quest for mastery within the environment
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
theoretical antecedents of CMOPE
Canadian Model of Occupational Performance
Occupation through Adaptation model by Reed and Sanderson (1980)
Individual interaction through the medium of occupation with the environment
Health is achieved when both performance and satisfaction with occupation are optimized
Carl Rogers in 1940
Client-centered therapy is a non-directive approach
Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement
focused on occupational performance
individual interaction through medium of occupation with the environment
occupation is the central interests
vision of health, well-being, and justice through occupation, not just occupational performance
Humans are occupational beings
Occupation has therapeutic potential
Occupation affects health and well-being
Occupation organizes time and bring structures
Occupation brings meaning to life through culture and individual meaning
Occupations are idiosyncratic
assumptions of CMOPE
Occupation
Groups of activities and tasks for everyday life, named, organized, and given value and meaning by individuals and the culture
core domain of concern
bridge that connects people and environment
CMOPE
client-centered practice
client controls the therapeutic agenda
CMOPE
Occupation, Client-centered practice, spirituality
Cardinal concepts of CMOPE
Person
component, affective, physical
spiritual component at its core
within the environment
CMOPE
Environment
where occupations occur
affords occupational possibilities
CMOPE
specifies domain of concern
client-centered is the most constructive way
no spirituality = no meaningful occupation
motivation associated with context, roles, and innate desire for mastery
psycho-educational approach requires understanding of teaching-learning process
Implications of CMOPE
Occupational Performance Model - Australia
occupational performance as its central concept
takes a more biopsychosocial approach to occupatonal performance
occupation as the interaction between the person and the environment
holistic, client-centered
driven by intrinsic and extrinsic drivers
Lifelong personal-environment relationship through occupation
primary focus of OPM
People as holistic beings with mind, body, spirit
occupation provides a sense of reality, mastery, competence, autonomy, and temporal organization
Health is competence and satisfaction in occupational performance
Humans are active in creating their occupational being or identity
Occupational being ideates and actualizes engagement in occupational roles
assumptions about human occupations - OPM
performance is >doing
performance as how someone reacts under certain conditions or fulfills a purpose
Incorporates “knowing“ and “being“
assumptions about human performance - OPM
humans → self-organizing systems = produce patterns of behavior arising from the cooperative interaction of many elements
humans = complex multidimensional subsystems
no one subsystem has logical priority
assumptions about self-organizing systems - OPM
Occupational performance
ability to perceive, desire, recall, plan, and carry out roles, routines, tasks, and subtasks for the purpose of self-maintenance, productivity, leisure, and rest in response to demands of the internal and/or external environment.
OPM
Occupational Performance Roles
Patterns of occupational behaviour are composed of configurations of self-maintenance, productivity, leisure, and rest occupations.
Roles are determined by individual person environment-performance relationships
They are established through need and/or choice
Modified with age, ability, experience, circumstance, and time
OPM
Body, Mind, Spirit
Core elements of OPM
Body
tangible physical components of human structure
OPM
Mind
core of our conscious and unconscious intellect
OPM
Spirit
Seeks a sense of harmony within self and between self, nature, others
OPM
Kawa Model
beyond western-based cultural contexts and assumptions
question OT privileging of individualism, independence, ableism
has cultural relevance and safety
Culture
Shared experiences and common spheres of meaning
Collective social processes by which distinctions, meanings, categorizations of objects, and phenomena are created and maintained
Kawa
Kawa (River)
Represents life
Complex profound journey that flows through time and space
optimal = strong, deep, unimpeded flow
Mizu (Water)
Life energy or flow
lives are bound and shaped by their surroundings, people, and circumstances
weakened = disharmony or unwell
stops = end of life
Kawa Zoko (River side-walls and bottom)
environment
most important determinant of life flow
its aspect affect overall flow
harmonious realtionship enable and complement life flow
Iwa (Rocks)
impediments to life flow
problematic and difficult to remove
Ryuboku (Driftwood)
Personal attributes and resources
Transient in nature
Can be inconsequential or obstructive
Can collide with other structures
Sukima (spaces between obstructions)
promise of OT
potential channels of flow
can erode rocks and rivers for larger conduits for life flow
Harmony
central point of reference of Kawa model
Harmony
state of individual or collective being in which the subject is in balance with the context that it is a part of
Kawa model