1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Before 1870
Public schools educated the children of upper classes
Grammar schools educated middle class
Working class attended elementary schools run by churches and charities
1880 Compulsory Education Act
By 1880, education was compulsory up to the age of 13
State run elementary schools from ages 5-13 in 1880
1944 Butler Act/Tripartite System
Aimed to make education meritocratic
Ability + effort
11+ exam, allocated based on ability
Allocated to grammar schools, secondary moderns and technical schools
Grammar schools
Academic curriculum
Access to non-manual jobs and higher education
For pupils with ability to pass 11+ (mainly middle class)
Top 20% of 11+
Secondary Moderns
Non-academic practical curriculum
Access to manual work for pupils who failed the 11+
Mainly WC
Bottom 75% of 11+
Technical schools
Technical training for engineering and mechanics
Prepared students for work-related trades
Only 5% of 11+ went here
Criticisms of Tripartite
Instead of meritocracy, reproduced class inequality
Channelled two social classes into two different types of school, each offering differing opportunities
Gender inequality: Girls had to gain higher marks than boys on 11+ for grammar school place (feminist)
Legitimised class inequality through myth of meritocracy - in reality childrenās environment greatly affects their chances of success
All other perspectives are marxist
Comprehensive system
Introduced in 1966
Aimed to overcome class inequality of tripartite system, making education more meritocratic
11+ abolished. along with grammars and secondary moderns
Replaced by comprehensives that ALL pupils within an area would attend
Criticisms of comprehensives
Left to local education authority to decide whether to go comprehensive, and not all did
Grammar schools and the divide between grammar schools and comprehensives remains today
Functionalist view of comprehensives
Fulfils essential functions such as social integration and meritocratic selection for future work roles (role allocation)
Marxist view of comprehensives
Education serves the interests of capitalism by reproducing and legitimising class inequality
1988 Education Reform Act
League tables
Formula funding
Ofsted inspections (more officially in 1992)
Focus on marketisation
New Right view of education
Competition between schools is good (included 1988 ERA):
Empowers the consumers (parents/pupils)
Brings diversity of school
Choice
Efficiency - meeting needs of pupils and parents further
It improvees standards as schools to compete to attract students and funds
Teachers will work harder to improve grades
New Vocationalism - New Right
Education system was not producing pupils with the right skills needed for the modern economy
Comprehensivisation: Academic qualifications, but many jobs required
New waves of new vocational qualifications introduced (e.g. GNVQs, BTECs and YTS) programmes that were more practical and technical skills focussed, preparing for actual workplace/industry
New Labour policy (1997-2010)
Continued diversity and choice, competition is good
But emphasised equality of opportunity more
Policies e.g. Aim Higher and Education Action Zones
Coalition government (2010-2015)
Conservative and Lib Dems
Prime Minister David Cameron: āEncourage excellence, competition and innovationā by freeing schools from the state
Free schools, academies and public schools
Policies to reduce gender inequality
GIST/WISE
Teachers actively challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
Equality and Diversity framework
Policies to reduce social class inequality
Free school meals for pupils under 7 (coalition)
Educational Maintenance Allowance (16-18 year olds) (New Labour)
Aim Higher
Pupil Premium (Coalition)
Policies to reduce ethnic inequality
1985 Swann Report advocated a multicultural education
Ofsted implementing Equality and Diversity criteria
English as an additional language programme in schools