1/164
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Marketing Research
surveys, data analysis, and focus groups
Key Marketing Activities
Understand customer needs and wants
Design services and products to satisfy these needs and wants
Offer value at a price
Exchange value and earn profits: think about competitors
Is the customer satisfied?
Competitor analysis
a strategic process of researching and evaluating rival businesses to understand their strengths, weaknesses, products, and marketing tactics relative to your own
Primary Function of MR

Need for marketing research
focus on the use of information as a source of strategic advantage
need to have a thorough knowledge of customers, their attitudes, tastes, and preferences
need to analyze competition for benchmarking and making price, product, market, and segment decisions
Top Ten MR activities
Industry characteristics and trends
Customer satisfaction
Market share analysis
Segmentation
Purchase behavior
Brand awareness
Purchase intention
Brand preference
Concept testing
Marketing potential
Purposes
defining problems/opportunities
objectives
what information is required
The MR Process
purposes and objectives
research design
data collection
data analysis
report
Decision problems
ex. dunkin donuts introduces a new donut
research problems
design a test market, evaluate locations, quantify impact of price changes on sales
research design
the detailed blueprint to guide the implementation of a research study toward the realization of its objectives (consistency with research objective and data collection and analysis)
categories of research
exploratory, descriptive, and casual
Exploratory research
Used when seeking insights into the general nature of a problem, the possible decision alternatives, and the relevant variables that need to be considered
Problem ambiguous
Focus groups
Qualitative research; quantitive analysis unimportant
Descriptive Research
Problem-aware
Provides an accurate snapshot of some aspect of the market environment
Surveys
Larger sample; quantifying results is desirable
Casual Research
Problem defined
Used when it is necessary to show that one variable causes or determines the values of other variables: a causal relationship
Experiments: controlled vs. natural
Problem with observational data
Detective Funnel
Uses a combination of all three research techniques
Exploratory techniques generate all possible reasons for a problem
Descriptive and Causal approaches narrow the possible causes

Once the research approach has been chosen develop:
The specifications of measurements
Plan for choosing the sample
Methods of analysis
Analysis of value versus cost and time invovled
The value of information
Marketing research should be done only if the potential value of the improved decision is higher than the potential cost of the information being collected
Firms are risk neutral when
Uncertainty, change of decision, and risk make marketing research
Is MR Necessary?
Consider value of information and cost/time
Primary data
They are collected especially to address a specific research objective (data from focus groups, surveys, experiments)
Secondary data
They were collected for some purpose other than solving the present problem (census data, customer database, syndicated data)
Benefits and Limitations of Secondary Data

Secondary Data Sources - Internal
Sales
Factory shipments
Distributor / Dealer reports
Customer feedback - online reviews as well
Secondary Data Sources - External
Published Data
Private studies
Online Databases
Published data
Government
Trade associations
Periodicals/newspapers/books
Annual reports
Consumer attitudes/lifestyles, trends, and industry conditions
Consumer panels
Cross-sectional - thousands of participating households and time series of hundreds of weeks of purchasing data (home audit and mail diary method)
Scanner audits
used to study the behavior of the consumer when different elements of the marketing mix are varied
Single - source systems
Track the behavior of individual households, from the TV set to the checkout counter
Massive amounts of data
suppliers of scanner data have created expert systems to cut the mass of scanner data down to actionable piece of information
Measuring promotion effectiveness
scanner data and diary panels
Measuring Ad exposure and effectiveness
NTI/ Starch Scores/ Arbitron/ Multimedia Services
Measuring product sales and market share
diary panels / retails audit/ scanner data/ internal records
estimation and evaluation of models
scanner data / diary panels/ internal records
personalization through tracking
a new generation of internal secondary data companies can now track their customers' purchase and browsing behavior and customer
advertising
price
promotion
product
advertising
messages and ad placement this would eliminate the all too common mass advertising in the online space
exploratory research
data on consumer traits that cannot be directly observed and measured (soft data) - not structured and based on a very small sample
Individual in depth Interviews
non directive interviews and focused interviews
non directive interviews
respondent is given maximum freedom to respond
focused interviews
interviewer covers a specific list of topics with a fixed time allotted to each question, and focused interviews are useful with busy executives and others
focus group discussions
group internation (5-9), expensive, and widely used (15% of MR revenues)
advantages of focus group discussions
synergy, stimulation, and speed data collection
disadvantages of focus group discussions
moderation difficult, not freely adaptable across cultures, and sampling
Types of focus groups
exploratory, clinical, and experiential
exploratory focus groups
used in the exploratory phase of the market research process and used for generating hypothesis
clinical focus groups
Premise: an individual's true feelings and motivations are subconscious in nature. Motivations are subconscious
Experiential focus groups
Experience the emotional frameworks in which the product is being used
Projective techniques
word association
completion test
third person techniques
Limitations of Qualitative Methods
Potential susceptibility of the results to being misused or misinterpreted
Results not necessarily representative of the whole population
Moderator or interviewer’s role is extremely critical and can lead to ambiguous or, at times, misleading results
Observational Data
Also called the “anthropology” method
Simple observation of consumer behavior generates insightful ideas:
1. direct observation
2. physical trace measures
3. behavior - recording devices
Limitations of Observational Methods
Cannot be used to observe motives, attitudes, or intentions
More costly and time-consuming
Surveys
used to measure attitudes, behavior, demographics, psychographics, etc.
Overwhelming choice for data collection
Prolific
Versatile
Survey Process and Potential Error

Non- response errors
phenotypic and genotypic source
Possible reasons of non - response errors
Nature of questions and place
Subject of no interest to the respondent
Fear, invasion of privacy
Hostility towards sponsor
Personal bias
Time and effort to respond
Phenotypic Source
Characteristics of the data collection procedure - question asked, how the question is asked and length of interview
Genotypic Source
indigenous - age, sex, occupation
Possible reasons for Response Error
Inability to respond correctly: poor memory or bias in memory
Vague questions; cannot formulate an adequate answer
Concern about invasion of privacy
Time pressure and fatigue
Prestige seeking and social desirability response bias, courtesy bias
Possible reasons Interviewer Error
Respondents’ impression of the interviewer
Questions, probing, and recording
Fraud and deceit
Personal Surveys
Door - to - door, mail intercept, etc.
Advantages of personal surveys
Keep interest, build rapport (reduce non-response error)
Increase participation (reduce non-response error)
Provide clarifications (reduce response errors)
Flexible
Disadvantages of personal surveys
Time - consuming and costly
Response error : social desirability
Interviewer error : bias from asking questions
Telephone Surveys
Random - digit dialing (RDD), systematic RDD, etc.
Advantages of telephone surveys
time and cost effective
Disadvantages of telephone survey
Non - response error (genotypic and phenotypic)
Response error : long interviews are difficult
Inability to employ visual aids of complex tasks
Mail Surveys
The most commonly used form of surveys
Advantages of mail surveys
Cost- effective and prolific
No social desirability bias, reduces response error
No interviewer bias
Disadvantages of mail surveys
Nonresponse error
No control over how surveys are conducted ( response error)
Inflexible (response error)
Lack of control of sample (sampling error)
Advantages of Internet Surveys
Speed: Faster delivery, response, and analysis than regular mail.
Cost: Cheaper than mail surveys.
Direct: No intermediaries involved.
Convenient: Respondents answer on their own schedule (unlike phone surveys).
Control: Allows candidate prescreening and skip-logic/question routing.
Disadvantages of Internet Surveys
Risk of spamming/unsolicited bulk emails.
Lower security/privacy concerns, leading to potentially untruthful answers.
Issues for measuring attitudes
Attitudes lead to behavior
Ask about attitudes vs. observe and interpret behavior
Issues to bear in mind
How to ask the questions
How to measure attitudes
How to evaluate whether or not the results are accurate
Attitudes
precursors of behavior, and are used to plan advertising and promotion programs
The components of attitude
Cognition - What does the customer know?
Affection - What does the customer like?
Intention - What does the customer intend to do?
Attitude measurement and scaling types
Nominal Scale
Ordinal Scale
Interval Scale
Ration Scale
Nominal scale - store last visited
What is your gender?
Which of the following media influences your purchasing decisions the most? - TV, Radio, Newspaper
Ordinal scale - preference ranks for stores
How would you rank the quality of our brand compared with four others? (brands 1-4)
Interval scale - preference ratings for stores
How likely are you to buy a new automobile within the next six months?
(1) Defiantly will not buy - (5) Definitely will buy (scale 1-5)
Radio Scale - expenditure at scores
What is your annual income before taxes? - $
How far is your workplace from home? - miles
Single - item scales
only have one item to measure a construct (attitude)
itemized category scale
comparative scale
rank order scales
q-sort scales
constant - sum scale
Itemized Category scale (satisfaction surveys)
How satisfied are you with your current rental experience
Ranges from very satisfied - not at all satisfied
Comparative scale
a judgement comparing one object, concept, or person against another
Compared to option 1, option 2’s quality is (superior or inferior)
Rank order scales
Scale in which the respondent compares one item with another or a group of items against each other and ranks them
Please rank from 1-6 the following characteristics of the cellular phone services ( 1 is most important and 6 is least important, no tiesn allowed)
Q-sort scales
Respondents are asked to sort the various characteristics of objects that are being compared into various groups, such that the objects in each group are viewed as the most familiar, then the respondent can rank order the objects within each group
Constant - sum scale
Respondents are asked to allocate a fixed number or rating points (usually 100) among several objects to reflect the relative preference for each object
Issues in designing single item scales
number
types
strength
labeling
balance
Multiple item scales
measure a sample of beliefs toward the attitude objects and combine the set of answers into an average score
Likert Scale
Semantic Scale
Likert scale
The respondent is to indicate the degree of agreement or disagreement with a variety of statements related to the attitude or object , undimensional
Likert scale is also called …
The summated scale: scores on individual items are summed to give a total
If my hair doesn’t look good, my whole day doesn’t go right
Semantic scale
Respondents are asked to rate each attitude object in turn on a five- to seven-point rating scale, bounded at each end by polar adjectives or phrases
Two issues of multiple item scales
validity and reliability
Validity
Does the measure capture what it is supposed to
Face validity
Are attitudes towards attributes reasonable?
Convergent validity
Are attitudes towards dissimilar items different?
Discriminant validity
Are the attitudes towards dissimilar items different?
Reliability
The measure is stable over repeated measurements
Observed score
True score + systematic error + random error
Validity =
Observed score = True score