1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Selfishness in economics
can be interpreted as self-interest
everyone benefits
if no one had aspirations beyond a fast food worker, we wouldn’t be able to grow and invent things
Incentives in economics
behaviour manipulation prices
the cobra effect
sales (attracting participants)
tax on unhealthy drinks?
economic lens → exchange creates wealth
south korea is so much richer than north korea because they internationally trade
transaction must be beneficial both parties
economic lens → opportunity cost
value of time
should pro athletes mow their own lawns?
skyrim → people spent too much time playing and not enough time contributing to the economy (failure)
economic lens → power of markets
scale drives down price
competition and innovation make things better
economic lens → reshoring
cheaper production in another country
communism
started by marx
eradicate inequality
eliminate power struggle between bourgeois (rich) and proletariat (poor)
violent revolution → overthrow the bourgeois, politicians, and government
classless society
no religion
no private property
no disagreement
in practice
you need to harness people’s self interest
if they know they are just going to receive the same they may not have the same motivation
eg. truckers paid by delivery vs by hour
socialism
known as milder communism
eg. sweden, norway, saudi arabia
no violent revolution, not complete equality
tax on corporations to pay for public goods
government control on some vital industries
progressive tax
capitalism
fair competition = ideal productivity and standard of living
drives innovation
smith’s idea
“laissez faire” → little government intervention
success and failure are necessary
little tax, few public goods
justification for capitalism
natural wealth disparity
only the highly competitive and competent will end up doing well
trickle down economics will take care of the poor
capitalists don’t like
monopoly → one person rules, no competition
oligopoly → multiple parties, choose not to compete
authoritarian capitalism
china → “communism”
they are actually capitalists → have private ownership and wealth gap
lots of government control
foreign policy → business not aid
will provide money for infrastructure as an investment for future business
economic political goals
political stability → trust in the government, no riots
manageable public debt → not all debt is bad
if it makes the economy better and will be paid off
economic growth → steady growth (2-3%)
equitable distribution of income
full employment → ideally 93% of working age population
economic freedom → buy the things you want
environmental stewardship → take care of it
adam smith ideas
invisible hand
markets self-regulate → “laissez faire”
principle of scarcity
scarcity drives up price
diamonds are the hardest substance, we need water for life, but since there is more water, water is cheaper
professional training
some professional jobs are so rare that the workers can’t take sick days, but they get paid a lot
involution
when you drop prices to attract more customers, but make competition and margins counterproductive
everyone loses → customers lose quality, company loses money
creative destruction
have to allow failure and replacement for growth
eg. piano → gramophone → radio → television
temporary loss of jobs will eventually lead to better products, overall growth and gain
built in obsolescence
things designed to need replacement ahead of the longest they can actually make it last
lightbulb
business model
tech is designed to need replacement so that they can make more money
ricardo
contemporary of adam smith
absolute advantage → 2 communities will trade even if 1 is better at production of both things
veblen
conspicuous consumption
branding and image → recognition
brand bombing → seeing chains everywhere
brand sabotage → celebrity influence for promotion or demotion
buddah’s second noble truth
life is suffering
suffering is caused by desire
haidt
psychological adaptation → the problem with acquiring stuff is that it does little for your long-term happiness
eg. big house, longer commute
game theory
created by van neuman
framework for analyzing strategic outcomes where the outcome for each player depends on the choices made by all participants
eg. ultimatum game, prisoners dilemma
foundational presumption of rationality
elements of game theory
players
strategies
outcomes
elements of game theory → players
firms
elements of game theory → strategies
choices available
kant → philosopher in russia
categorical (absolute) imperative (must do)
must always be honest
sun tzu’s art of war book
dishonesty can be useful
if you’re weak, act strong; if you’re strong, act weak
elements of game theory → outcomes
all players use a strategy to get an outcome
zero-sum games
eg. chess, poker
one winner one loser
exception: phyrric victories (winner at a cost)
positive sum games
eg. trade negotiations, business deals, paris climate conference
everyone can win
cooperative
bounded rationality
we are rational human beings but we have limits on
info
time
mental bandwidth (we automatically filter options)
common biases in bounded rationality
anchoring bias
loss aversion
status quo bias
availability heuristic
overvaluing of present
scarcity messages
common biases in bounded rationality → anchoring bias
take the first piece of information very seriously
eg. “it was $100 but now it’s only $40”
common biases in bounded rationality → loss aversion
if you go to the casino and lose $500 it feels worse than gaining $100
common biases in bounded rationality → status quo bias
people tend to not want to change
common biases in bounded rationality → availability heuristic
hearing an influencing single fact (even if it’s outlandish)
plane crash
crypto
common biases in bounded rationality → overvaluing of present
delayed gratification
waiting for a bigger reward
common biases in bounded rationality → scarcity messages
“only 1 left”
fritz haber
creates chlorine gas (loses his wife over this)
also invented artificial fertilizer which was really helpful in agriculture, improving population
received nobel prize which was protested against
also created zyklon a, which the nazis based zyklon b on (gas used in chambers during ww2)
concept of disavowal
you learn information but it doesn’t affect your decisions
eg. child labour, health effects
de minimis fees
no tax on small transactions
opiods vs opiates
opiods → lab made
opiates → naturally occurring, usually farmed
behavioural economics → commonly exploited heuristics
trust heuristic
loss aversion
confirmation bias
reciprocity norm
behavioural economics → confirmation bias
“your parents did this and it worked out for them”
behavioural economics → reciprocity norm
eg. free samples
you feel like you owe the company something