1/38
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Assumptions of the behaviourist approach
everyone is born as a 'blank slate' which life writes upon (Watson, ‘30)
all behaviour is learnt from the environment and can be understood by classical and operant conditioning
Classical conditioning
behaviourist approach
learning via association : Pavlov (1897)
Food (UCS) → Dog drools (UCR)
Bell (NS) → Dog doesn’t respond
Bell (NS) + Food (UCS) → Dog drools (UCR)
Bell (CS) → Dog drools (CR)
Operant conditioning
behaviourist approach
learning via reinforcement and punishment : Skinner
Skinner studied rats in a Skinner Box.
The box had a lever that released food (positive reinforcement)
Rats explored and accidentally pressed the lever.
They learned to repeat the behaviour to get food.
Shows behaviour is strengthened by reinforcement.
AO3: Use of scientific methods
behaviourist approach
Uses lab experiments with controlled variables (Skinner’s box) = high internal validity + replicability
may lack ecological validity because real-life learning often occurs in more complex environments.
AO3: Real life application
behaviourist approach
Systematic Desensitisation: uses classical conditioning to treat phobias by gradually associating a feared stimulus with relaxation instead of fear.
AO3: Environmental determinism
behaviourist approach
Alludes that all behaviour displayed is learnt from our environment and ignores the idea free will
This oversimplifies human behaviour and neglects internal mental processes
AO3: Uses animal studies
behaviourist approach
many behaviourist studies use animals (rats, dogs), the findings are hard to generalise to humans due to differences in complexity, cognition, and emotions
some animal studies also raise ethical concerns about the treatment of animals in experiments
Assumptions of the biological approach
everything psychological has a biological basis
Genetic basis of behaviour
Biological approach
Behavioural characteristics are inherited
Twin studies are used to investigate a genetic basis for specific traits
Concordance rates
Biological approach
used to measure the extent to which both twins share the same characteristics
Monozygotic twins share 100% of each others genes
Dizygotic twins share about 50% of each other’s genes
If a characteristic is genetic, it would be an expected 100% concordance rate of MZ twins
Genotype
genetic makeup
Phenotype
characteristics of an individual determined by both genes and the environment
Natural selection : Darwin
biological approach
genetically determined behaviour that enhances survival will continue in future generation
Nervous system
biological approach
CNS: brain + spinal cord, receives, sends and responds to sensory info
Spinal cord: transmits signals between the brain and the rest of the body
Endocrine system
biological approach
sends chemical messages by secreting hormones into the blood stream
Pituitary gland: instructs other glands to release hormones (testosterone, adrenaline, oxytocin)
The brain
biological approach
Temporal lobe: hearing and speech comprehension
Frontal lobe: voluntary movement
Cerebellum: balance and coordination of movement
AO3: Research support for twin studies
biological approach
Bouchard et al: (‘90): Collected data on 1,500 pairs of twins
MZ twins reared together showed a correlation of +0.9
The large sample size and quantitative data give this study good reliability
AO3: Research support for evolution
biological approach
Curtis et al (04): Higher levels of disgust for disease-salient images
Disgust is an evolutionary mechanism as it prevents people from ingesting toxic materials
If people have an innate disgust response to rotten food = validity to the idea that humans are biologically programmed for survival
AO3: Real world application
biological approach
success of drug therapies: SSRIs for the treatment of psychological disorders such as depression and OCD
AO3: Biological determinism
biological approach
arguing that complex human behaviour is a product of genetics alone is a simplistic view which ignores environmental factors on behaviour = limits external validity
Assumptions of the humanistic approach
humans have free will, humans should be viewed holistically, each individual is unique
what is free will
humanistic approach
describes people as self determining
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
humanistic approach
interested in what motivates people and how to achieve self actualisation
Physiological (essential): water, food, air, shelter
Safety: security, protection, law, order
Social: friendship, family, love, feeling of belonging
Esteem needs: self worth, accomplishment, respect
Self actualisation: self fulfilment, transcendence, autonomy
Congruence
humanistic approach
self image overlaps with your ideal self. to be completely congruent you have to achieve self actualisation.
Incongruence
humanistic approach
Occurs when the gap between the real and ideal self is too wide + self actualisation isn’t possible
Conditions of worth
humanistic approach
Rogers claimed that issues we experience as adults like worthlessness + low self esteem can be explained from a lack of unconditional positive regard in childhood
UPR: When one receives acceptance without any conditions
or judgments.
Counselling: Rogers developed client-centred therapy to reduce incongruence between self image + ideal self and to increase persons feelings of self worth
AO3: Holistic approach
humanistic approach
Gives a complete + realistic understanding of people in comparison to other approaches
Behaviourist: learn behaviour from our environment, focuses on rewards and conditioning
Biological: reduces behaviour to physical causes like hormones, genes + brain chemicals
Cognitive: reduces behaviour to mental processes like thinking, perception + memory
AO3: Positive approach
humanistic approach
Removes blame, guilt and shame from people who seek counselling, likely to lead to a good rate of client retention
AO3: Limited real life application
humanistic approach
Difficult to operationalise + measure so it lacks reliability being too
opened to interpretation
AO3: Culture bias
humanistic approach
More applicable to individualistic cultures: HON emphasised the importance of reaching self actualisation. Rogers also placed value in one’s self-esteem and personal growth.
Assumptions of the cognitive approach
Internal mental processes like memory, thinking and perception. They can’t be directly observed so we make inferences
theoretical + computer models are used to understand IMP
Theoretical model
cognitive approach
info processing approach: suggests info flows through cognitive systems in stages such as the MSM
Computer model
cog approach
mind is compared to a computer
Storage: computer = RAM + hard drives. | mind = STM + LTM
Brain acts as a CPU: responsible for processing info
Coding: computer = encodes data | mind = converts info into a usable format
Schemas
cog approach
Shortcuts helping us process info faster and stop you from becoming overwhelmed with environmental stimuli
Babies are born with simple motor schemas for innate behaviours and as you get older, they become more sophisticated
Cognitive neuroscience
cog approach
Origins: discovery of the Broca’s area which is linked to speech production
New tech: fMRI + PET allow psychologists to study how mental processes are linked to brain activity
AO3: Real life application
humanistic approach
t has contributed to the development of AI due to it’s use of theoretical and computer models
AO3: Has a degree of flexibility
humanistic approach
It is an example of soft determinism compared to the hard determinism of the behaviourist approach
This means that the cognitive approach does not take a completely rigid view of human behaviour; it acknowledges the existence of free will
AO3: Machine reductionism
humanistic approach
ignores the influence of human emotion and motivation on the cognitive system, and how this may affect our ability to process information.
AO3: IMP can only be inferred
humanistic approach
So the explanation of behaviour is overly abstract and detached from real life = low external validity