1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Immediacy of reinforcement
Reinforcement is so effective when it's immediate that it causes a lot of people to act on problems due to the immediacy of wanting something
Studying self control
Choice between small immediate reward and a larger delayed reward
Impulsivity
choosing the small immediate (sooner) reinforcer
Self-control
choosing the larger, delayed reinforcer
Smaller, more immediate reinforcer
Larger, more delayed reinforcer
Delay discount
You discount something the further away it is.
The delay decreases the value of reinforcement
Ainslie-Rachlin Principle
Reinforcement value changes as the delay between making a choice and obtaining the reinforcer changes
Reinforcement value decreases as the delay to that reinforcer increases
Delay Discounting
discount the amount of reinforcement; the farther something is in the future, the less powerful, valuable it is. Even if it is the same amount, the farther away it is, the less powerful it becomes.
Relationship between delay discounting and health
The prospect of a good future is not enough to compete with getting the feeling of a drug right now, immediately
Treatment based on behavioral approaches is significantly better than any other studies because of how it's conceptualized
The farther away something is
the less value it is
You change how you make your decisions depending on WHEN you make your decisions.
If you wait to make your decisions until the short-term one is right in front of you, you might change your decision to get the immediate one, which is a preference reversal
Compare preference a week before the party to preference Friday afternoon
The Ainslie-Rachlin principle is
preference reversal
Implications
Walter Mischel's marshmallow experiment
Impulsive Choice
Delay discounting (i.e., impulsive choice)
Extensively studied with various populations, commodities, environments
Drug users have been shown to discount the value of delayed rewards more steeply than non-drug-using controls
Heroin, cocaine, alcohol, methylphenidate (Ritalin), nicotine
They don’t see the health issues at the moment
Don’t see the consequences that will counteract the immediate reinforcement of having that drug right now
Smokers discount delayed rewards more rapidly than never, and ex-smokers
Smokers make more “impulsive” choices
You can change your discounting
impulsive choice and smoking
Your discounting can be affected over time
You are less impulsive if it's farther away
More impulsive if it's closer to you
Teaching tolerance to delayed rienforcers
Schweitzer & Sulzer-azaroff (1988)
Commitment responses
Rachlin & Green (1972)
Provide immediate reinforcers for “healthy choice” (contingency management)
Dallery & Raiff (2006)
Sometimes, delay can be a big factor in setting the occasion for problem behavior
we want to avoid that form happening
Self-Control and Commitment
When choices occur well in advance of outcomes, self-control choices are more likely
When choices occur in close proximity to the outcomes, impulsive choices are more likely
Rachlin & Green
Choosing green gives you a choice later.
Choosing red provides only the delayed, larger option later.
When choices are made in advance, we are self-controlled
Commitment Response
Choosing now NOT to choose later