1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
How does cross sectional research work in development of offending
Looks for differences between offenders and non offenders
Or between different groups of offenders
Data is collected at just one time point
How does longitudinal research work in development of offending
Follows individuals over a period of time, multiple data collection points
Identifies predictors/risk factors
Retrospective vs prospective design
What is the Cambridge study
Longitudinal study started in 1961
Followed 411 boys from 19-61 years
Participants were from London but research was conducted in Cambridge
The boys were followed up from the age of 8 and collected criminal records and information up to 61 years
Found data on convictions from official records and self reports
What did the Cambridge study find
20% of participants were convinced as juveniles
By 25 years, around 33% were convicted
Childhood predictors of later offending included poor parenting and family criminality
How do 2 types of child rearing/parenting predict offending
Child rearing/parenting styles:
Looks at behaviours of parent child interactions overall
Dimensions of parenting:
Looks at discipline and behaviours and the children individually
What is an authoritarian child parenting style
“Do as I say”
Values obedience and favours punitive punishment
Children usually are socially incompetent and have low self esteem
What is an authoritative child parenting styles
“Do as I ask”
Uses inductive style of discipline
Children usually come out socially competent and self assured
What is a permissive parenting style
“Do what you want”
Prefers to allow children freedom of expression
Children are usually impulsive and have low academic attainment
More antisocial behaviour
What is a rejecting neglectful child parenting style
“I don’t care what you do”
Children are neglected
Children usually have low social competence and low academic attainment More antisocial
More drug use
What are the control and support parenting dimensions
Control, behaviours to “control” a child’s behaviour
Support, behaviours that make a child feel accepted/approved
What are the different types of control discipline
Lax discipline
Inconsistent discipline
Harsh discipline
What is lax discipline
Permissive, a few rules with low supervision
Associated with later delinquency due to poor understanding of boundaries
What is inconsistent discipline
Erratic discipline
Unpredictable enforcement of rules, rules and consequences are applied unevenly
May cause rebellious behaviour
Creates confusion about expectation and consequences
What is harsh discipline
Physically or verbally punitive, controlling
Leads to coercive family interactions
Children will respond to harshness with defiance which escalates parental punishment
Increases risk of aggression, antisocial behaviour and delinquency
What are the different types of control supervision
Knowledge of child’s behaviour and whereabouts
Setting of rules and ensuring they are adhered to
Indirect as well as direct supervision
Need a source of knowledge about what the child is doing eg asking the child for information
Poor supervision is associated with delinquency
What is delinquency
A minor crime especially committed by young people
How is the support by the parent/carer important
Warm parental/carer child interactions are needed for strong attachment
Savage (2014) reported that weak attachments to parent/carers are associated with higher levels of offending and violence
Emotionally Cold and rejecting parenting is associated with offending
Mother vs father parenting style
Previous researchers has less emphasis on fathers
Parent child dyads
Same gender eg mother and daughter
Opposite gender eg father and daughter
Fathers tend to have more of an impact on their sons behaviour due to them being more likely to model them
Meta analysis by Pinquart on parenting and offending (2017)
Found that all dimensions of parenting are associated with delinquency/offending
Strongest effect size for harsh control and psychological control
Strong effect size for authoritarian, permissive and neglectful parenting
Small effect size for parental warmth, behavioural control, autonomy granting (whether the child was given autonomy at a certain age) and authoritative parenting style
Small effect size linked with low level of anti social behaviour
Child abuse and neglect
Victims of abuse are more likely to:
Have a criminal record
Be convicted of non violent offences
Be convicted of violent offences
Maxfield and Widom (1996) US longitudinal study on abuse and neglect
908 cases of child abuse or neglect from court records
667 comparison groups matched on dob, race, sex and social class
Victims of abuse/neglect are 49% more likely to have been arrested than the comparison group (38%)
Victims of abuse/neglect are 18% more likely to have been arrested for violence than comparison group (14%)
Milaniak and Widom follow up study (2015)
Follow up data on perpetration of criminal violence and child abuse
Victims of abuse/neglect are more likely than comparison group to be arrested for and/or
Self reported criminal violence
Self reported child abuse perpetration
Self report intimate partner violence
What cognitive style might be responsible for child abuse and violence
Poor coping styles and problem solving skills
Social information processing patterns, how we perceive interactions
Emotional desensitisation to pain
Learn that violence is a way to get what they want, social learning theory
How does the environment influence child abuse and violence
Changes in family environment that have negative behavioural effects eg being placed in care
Victims become labelled
Research issues involved with child abuse
Identification of cases, how/from where
Official records
Self report
Reports from others (who?)
Under reporting