Examine:Analyse The Differences In The Ways In Which The US President And The UK Prime Minister Are Accountable To Their Respective Legislatures.

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:19 PM on 6/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

8 Terms

1
New cards

Paragraph Focus

  • Para 1 = Removal

  • Para 2 = Committees

  • Para 3 = Direct Accountability

2
New cards

Para 1 = President

  • eg. In the US, the impeachments of President Trump in 2019 (Ukraine) and 2021 (January 6) both produced Senate acquittal short of the two-thirds conviction threshold; the 25th Amendment has never been used to remove a sitting President

  • this shows that the President can be held to account by their legislatures through impeachment

  • this prevents unchecked power of the executive, upholding the rule of law and preventing tyranny

3
New cards

Para 1 = PM

  • eg. in 1979, James Callaghan’s minority Labour government fell after a vote of no confidence

  • this shows that the PM can be held to account by their legislatures through vote of no confidence

  • this prevents unchecked power of the executive and upholding a government that is not fit to run the country or lacks governing competency

4
New cards

Para 2 = President

  • eg. Sept 2025, House Oversight Committee published approx 33k pages of documents relating to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and Trumps involvement

  • fulfilling checks and balances function of the constitution etc etc

  • difference = investigation vs (UK) discuss policy

5
New cards

Para 2 = PM

  • eg. the UK, the Liaison committee, made up of the chairs of 32 select committees from the House of Commons from the UK Parliament eg. March 2026, 90 min session with Kier Starmer

  • this shows how the legislature can use committees to hold the PM to account by questioning the PM on public policy

  • this ensures that PM is effectively completing their manifesto promises and checks the power of the PM

6
New cards

Para 3 = President

  • Whereas in the USA, the presidents are not directly accountable to Congress due to separation of powers.

  • However, the President needs the approval of the Senate when appointing member to the executive or a member to the Supreme Court.

  • For example, for the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court in 2018 (nomination by President Trump) was approved by the Senate, 51-49

7
New cards

Para 3 = PM

PMQ - Nigel Farage - Henry Novak

8
New cards

Comparative Theory

  • this can be explained by the structural theory

  • the executives physical relationships with the legislature is fixed by constitutional design

  • UK = fusion of powers means PM is inside Commons chamber and can be directly held to account

  • US = separation of powers so president is outside of congress making it harder