1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
prognathism in apes vs humans
in apes:
faces are prognathic
jaws are longer and stick outward
in humans:
prognathism is reduced
faces are flat
diastema in apes vs humans
in apes:
Presence of diastema (a gap between teeth to accommodate canines)
in humans:
No diastema – to allow for more space in mouth to articulate speech
dentition in apes vs human
in apes:
jaws are V-shaped to allow for chomping raw vegetation
presence of a simian shelf
large canines and large teeth sizes (for aggression and fighting)
in humans:
Jaws are U shaped to allow for a more varied diet
No simian shelf
Smaller canines and reduced teeth size and molars (due to use of tools instead of teeth)
brain size in apes vs humans
in apes:
ape brains range from 400cm^3 to 500cm^3
smaller cranial capacity
in humans:
human brains range from 900cm^3 to 2220cm^3
larger cranial capacity (to house the bigger brain)
convolutions in brains apes vs humans
in apes:
less convolutions/folds -> reduced surface area limits cognitive abilities
in humans:
more convolutions/folds -> higher surface area means increased cognitive abilities
specialised language areas in apes vs humans
in apes:
No specialised language areas; instead they communicate with basic gestures
in humans:
Presence of the Broca’s area and Wernicke’s area to produce and understand complex language
foramen magnum in apes vs humans
in apes:
Foramen magnum is positioned more towards the back → head sticks out & supported by neck muscles
in humans:
Foramen magnum centrally placed at the bottom of the skull → skull balances on vertebral column
pelvis in apes vs humans
in apes:
longer and narrow pelvis to support greater mobility (e.g. climbing, swinging)
in humans:
shorter & wider bowl shaped pelvis to support abdominal organs and carry foetus during pregnancy (for women)
spine in apes vs humans
in apes:
“C-shaped” spine -> supports quadrupedal gait
in humans:
“S-shaped” spine –> to support a striding gait & maintain body’s centre of gravity
legs and glutes in apes vs humans
in apes:
smaller glutes used more for climbing and swinging
long arms, short legs -> supports quadrupedal gait
in humans:
larger, modified gluteus muscles
Long legs, short arms -> supports striding gait
femurs in apes vs humans
in apes:
femurs are vertical –> no carrying angle, weight distributed on all fours for quadrupedal gait
in humans:
femurs angle inward -> distributes weight and brings it towards outside of femur -> better stability and striding gait
feet in apes vs humans
in apes:
opposable toes -> can grip branches with feet
Flat feet & no arches -> better power grip for climbing and swinging in arboreal environments
in humans:
non-opposable toes (unique to humans)
transversal arch (to act as shock absorber) and longitudinal arch (to distribute weight evenly when walking)