NON EST FACTUM (LAWS202)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:09 AM on 6/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

24 Terms

1
New cards

Non est factum

That is not my deed defence for fundamental mistake about document

2
New cards

Purpose of non est factum

Protects signers misled about nature/effect of document

3
New cards

Effect of successful non est factum

Document void ab initio

4
New cards

Signature rule (L'Estrange v Graucob)

Signature binds even if document not read

5
New cards

Relationship to signature rule

Non est factum is an exception

6
New cards

Key requirement

Mistake about character or effect of document

7
New cards

Non

qualifying mistake

8
New cards

Gallie v Lee (Saunders v Anglia Building Society)

Leading authority on modern test

9
New cards

Gallie test

Document fundamentally different in substance or kind from intended

10
New cards

Element 1

Belief document was something different

11
New cards

Element 2

Difference relates to character/effect of document

12
New cards

Element 3

Mistake caused by another person’s misleading conduct

13
New cards

Element 4

Signer not negligent

14
New cards

Element 5

Legal advice weakens defence

15
New cards

Source of mistake

Must be counterparty or their associate

16
New cards

Self

induced mistake

17
New cards

Fraud alone

Not enough for defence

18
New cards

Required fraud

Fraud as to nature/effect of document

19
New cards

Negligence effect

Defence fails if careless

20
New cards

Bradley West v Keeman

Defence failed; misunderstanding not enough

21
New cards

Keeman principle

Lack of understanding alone insufficient

22
New cards

Radius Residential Care v Krishna

Defence succeeded on guarantee misunderstanding

23
New cards

CF Asset Finance v Okonji

Defence failed due to carelessness

24
New cards

Core test

Fundamental mistake + misleading conduct + no negligence