1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Non est factum
That is not my deed defence for fundamental mistake about document
Purpose of non est factum
Protects signers misled about nature/effect of document
Effect of successful non est factum
Document void ab initio
Signature rule (L'Estrange v Graucob)
Signature binds even if document not read
Relationship to signature rule
Non est factum is an exception
Key requirement
Mistake about character or effect of document
Non
qualifying mistake
Gallie v Lee (Saunders v Anglia Building Society)
Leading authority on modern test
Gallie test
Document fundamentally different in substance or kind from intended
Element 1
Belief document was something different
Element 2
Difference relates to character/effect of document
Element 3
Mistake caused by another person’s misleading conduct
Element 4
Signer not negligent
Element 5
Legal advice weakens defence
Source of mistake
Must be counterparty or their associate
Self
induced mistake
Fraud alone
Not enough for defence
Required fraud
Fraud as to nature/effect of document
Negligence effect
Defence fails if careless
Bradley West v Keeman
Defence failed; misunderstanding not enough
Keeman principle
Lack of understanding alone insufficient
Radius Residential Care v Krishna
Defence succeeded on guarantee misunderstanding
CF Asset Finance v Okonji
Defence failed due to carelessness
Core test
Fundamental mistake + misleading conduct + no negligence