Psychology of Personality- chapters 1-5

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/184

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

185 Terms

1
New cards

Psychological Triad

how people feel, think, and behave

2
New cards

Personality

an individual's characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting

3
New cards

basic approach

A theoretical view of personality that focuses on some phenomena and ignores others. A systematic, self-imposed limitation.

4
New cards

trait approach

focus their efforts on the ways that people differ psychologically and how these differences might be conceptualized, measured, and followed over time.

5
New cards

biological approach

try to understand the mind in terms of the body. That is, they address mechanisms such as anatomy, physiology, genetics, even evolution, and their relevance for personality.

6
New cards

psychoanalytic approach

is concerned primarily with the unconscious mind, and the nature and resolution of internal mental conflict.

7
New cards

phenomenological approach

Other psychologists focus on people's conscious experience of the world, their phenomenology,

8
New cards

learning and cognitive approach

social learning theory has evolved into an influential and prolific new field of personality research focused on cognitive processes, applying insights and methods derived from the study of perception, memory, and thought. Taken together, behaviorism, social learning theory, and cognitive personality psychology comprise the

9
New cards

learning

how people change their behavior as a result of rewards, punishments, and other experiences in life,

10
New cards

One-big-theory

for the time being, it's better to look at the different approaches, and not try to look for one all encompassing. think about those 7 in one devices… almost never do they do all tasks well

11
New cards

Funder's First Law

Great strengths are usually great weaknesses, and surprisingly often the opposite is true as well

12
New cards

There are no perfect indicators of personality; there are only clues, and clues are always ambiguous.

point of chapter 1

13
New cards

Sometimes regarded as a field that seeks to pigeonhole people, personality psychology's real mission is to appreciate the ways in which each individual is unique.

Personality Psych summed up

14
New cards

Funder's Second Law

There are no perfect indicators of personality; there are only clues, and clues are always ambiguous

15
New cards

Funder's Third Law

something beats nothing, two times out of three

16
New cards

S Data

self-judgments, or ratings that people provide of their own personality attributes or behavior

17
New cards

face validity

they are intended to measure what they seem to measure,

18
New cards

self-verification

the tendency to seek evidence to confirm the self-concept

19
New cards

I data

Informants' data, or judgments made by knowledgeable informants about general attributes of an individual's personality. letters of recommendation are a good example

20
New cards

judgments

they derive from somebody observing somebody else in whatever context they happen to have encountered them and then rendering a general opinion on the basis of such observation

21
New cards

S data advantages

Large amount of information

22
New cards

Access to thoughts, feelings, and intentions

23
New cards

Some S data are true by definition (e.g., self-esteem)

24
New cards

Causal force

25
New cards

Simple and easy

26
New cards

S data disadvantages

Maybe they can't tell you

27
New cards

Maybe they won't tell you

28
New cards

Too simple and too easy

29
New cards

I data advantages

Large amount of information

30
New cards

Real-world basis

31
New cards

Common sense

32
New cards

Some I data are true by definition (e.g., likeability)

33
New cards

Causal force

34
New cards

I data disadvantages

limited behavioral information,

35
New cards

lack of access to private experience,

36
New cards

error,

37
New cards

bias

38
New cards

L data advantages

Objective and verifiable Intrinsic importance Psychological relevance

39
New cards

L data disadvantages

multi-determination,

40
New cards

possible lack of psychological relevance

41
New cards

B data advantages

wide range of contexts,

42
New cards

appearance of objectivity

43
New cards

B data disadvantages

difficult and expensive,

44
New cards

uncertain interpretation

45
New cards

L-data

data that is more-or-less easily verifiable, concrete, real-life outcomes, which are of possible psychological significance.

46
New cards

B data

data that is translated directly or nearly directly into numerical form. B data can be gathered in natural or contrived (experimental) settings.

47
New cards

Reliability

measurements that reflect what you are trying to assess and are not affected by anything else.

48
New cards

measurement error

an error that occurs when there is a difference between the information desired by the researcher and the information provided by the measurement process

49
New cards

State

a mood that is current and presumably temporary

50
New cards

trait

usual level of experience

51
New cards

Factors That Undermine Reliability

Low precision of measurement

52
New cards

The state of the participant

53
New cards

The state of the experimenter

54
New cards

The environment

55
New cards

techniques to improve reliability

care with research procedure, standardized research protocol, measure something important, aggregation

56
New cards

aggregation

To come together into a mass, sum, or whole (story of the the science professor)

57
New cards

Spearman-Brown formula

In psychometrics, a mathematical formula that predicts the degree to which the reliability of a test can be improved by adding more items.

58
New cards

Validity

the extent to which a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to

59
New cards

constructs

idea that cannot be seen or measured directly

60
New cards

construct validation

the strategy of establishing the validity of a measure by comparing it with a wide range of other measures

61
New cards

Generalizability

the extent to which we can claim our findings inform us about a group larger than the one we studied

62
New cards

case method

a procedure for gathering scientific information by studying a single individual

63
New cards

experimental method

A method of investigation used to demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships by purposely manipulating one factor thought to produce change in another factor.

64
New cards

correlational method

two different variables are observed to determine whether there is a relationship between them

65
New cards

scatter plot

A graph with points plotted to show a possible relationship between two sets of data.

66
New cards

MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)

the most widely researched and clinically used of all personality tests. Originally developed to identify emotional disorders (still considered its most appropriate use),

67
New cards
68
New cards

objective tests; most widely used object of personality test; originally developed as an aid in diagnosing psychiatric disorders; two versions-adult and adolescent

69
New cards

CPI (California Psychological Inventory)

a self-report inventory that assesses personality characteristics in normal populations

70
New cards

16 personality factors

the personality test devised by Raymond Cattell to measure the 16 personality factors

71
New cards

SVIB (Strong Vocational Interest Blank)

questionnaire to choose suitable careers

72
New cards

projective hypothesis

The notion that standard but highly unstructured stimuli, as found in the Rorschach assessment's series of inkblots, are necessary to bypass defenses in order to reveal unconscious motives and conflicts.

73
New cards

S Data Collection in personality tests

usually fills out a questonaire saying how they think or feel about certain questions posed about them

74
New cards

Questions are cut and dry (are you shy?)

75
New cards
76
New cards

most objective tests (not all though)

77
New cards

B Data Collection in Personality Tests

Questions are more removed. They ask questions, and the person doesn't know the correlation between their answer and what the questioner is looking for (Do you like baths-> indictive of a person high in empathy)

78
New cards
79
New cards

all projective tests

80
New cards

reliability and validity

A test must have high estimates of reliability in order to have high estimates of validity. If instrument is inconsistent in its measurement, it's likely not measuring what it's designed to measure.

81
New cards
82
New cards

Reliability w/o validity: measurements averaging much different from true value with a small SD

83
New cards
84
New cards

Validity w/o reliability: measurements averaging the true value with a large SD

85
New cards

omnibus test

permits analysis of several variables or variable levels at the same time

86
New cards

objective test

a test that gives the same score when different people correct it because its yes or no based questions

87
New cards

factor analysis

a statistical procedure that identifies clusters of related items (called factors) on a test; used to identify different dimensions of performance that underlie a person's total score.

88
New cards

advantages of projective tests

Good for breaking the ice

89
New cards

Some skilled clinicians may be able to use them to get information not captured in other types of tests

90
New cards

disadvantages of projective tests

Validity evidence is scarce

91
New cards

Expensive and time-consuming

92
New cards

A psychologist cannot be sure about what they mean

93
New cards

Other, less expensive tests work as well or better

94
New cards

rational method of test construction

approach to building tests that requires test developers to begin with a clear-cut conceptualization of a trait and then write items to assess that conceptualization

95
New cards

factor analytic method of test construction

Identify which items group together by using the statistical technique of factor analysis

96
New cards

empirical method of test construction

approach to building tests in which researchers begin with two or more criterion groups and examine which items best distinguish them

97
New cards

BESD (Binomial Effect Size Display)

a brilliant technique for demonstrating the size of effect-size correlations. Their method

98
New cards

NHT (Null Hypotesis Testing)

designed to tell us whether a finding really exists, or is a fluke. It is not designed to tell us how impactful the result is

99
New cards

statistically significant

result is a result that is unlikely to occur just due

100
New cards

to chance