Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Bowlby’s continuity hypothesis
The nature of the relationship we form with our main caregiver in our first years of life shapes our future relationships in childhood and later into adulthood
Attachment style reflects our attitudes in relationships, incl: Self-esteem, interpersonal trust, but mainly the internal working model
Attachment and childhood relationships
According to Bowlby and Ainsworth, children’s attachment relationships in infancy will shape their childhood relationships with adults and peers
According to research, secure attachment in infancy leads to the following childhood characteristics:
Closer peer friendships
Greater emotional and social competence in adolescence
More reciprocal friendships
Secure attachment
Childhood: Good quality trusting friendships
Adulthood: Belief in long lasting love and secure, trusting relationships
Avoidant attachments
Childhood: Most likely to be victims of bullying, less likely to have a special friend
Adulthood: Lack of belief in long lasting love, finds it hard to get emotionally close to a partner, uninvolved
Resistant attachments
Childhood: Most likely to be bullies, finds it hard to maintain friendships
Adulthood: Tends to be paranoid their partner will leave them, controlling and argumentative
Hazan and Shaver (1987)
Analysis of 620 replies to a ‘love quiz’ published in a local newspaper
They assessed current relationships, past relationships and attachment types
56% secure/25% avoidant/19% resistant
Secure: Believed love is enduring, had mutual trust and were less likely to get divorced
Insecure: Felt love was rare, fell in and out of love easily, found relationships less easy, more likely to be divorced
Myron-Mason & Smith (1998)
196 chn aged between 7-11 in London
Found insecurely attached infants have later friendship difficulties, I-A chn more likely to be bullied and I-R chn more likely to be bullies