Lecture 7 - Repeated Measures ANOVA

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Difference in between subjects and within subjects

Within subjects = repeated measures

  • Between subjects: Each person assigned to one condition only one goal per person  

  • Repeated measures: same people providing multiple observations in multiple conditions at different times  

2
New cards
<p>You run a study on PTSD treatment pre, during, and post…. Describe the between-subjects and within-subjects variability&nbsp;</p>

You run a study on PTSD treatment pre, during, and post…. Describe the between-subjects and within-subjects variability 

There is a lot of between-subjects variability (people are just different from eachother on average)

Looking at the mean, there is a change over time → within-subject variability across the three measures (change within a subject)

3
New cards

What does partitioning variance mean

In ANOVAs, in the total variability of the DV we want to know how much of the variability is between subjects vs within subjects

  • We also want to know how much within subjects variability is due to the treatment effect and how much is just error left over

  • We use a source table to partition variance

<p>In ANOVAs, in the total variability of the DV we want to know how much of the variability is between subjects vs within subjects </p><ul><li><p>We also want to know how much within subjects variability is due to the treatment effect and how much is just error left over </p></li><li><p>We use a source table to partition variance </p></li></ul><p></p>
4
New cards

Source Table for within subjects ANOVA 

Between subjects → compute SS for between subjects to remove between subjects variability and have within subjects left over 

  • Once we have within, we can divide it into error and time (repeated) 

<p>Between subjects → compute SS for between subjects to remove between subjects variability and have within subjects left over&nbsp;</p><ul><li><p>Once we have within, we can divide it into error and time (repeated)&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p>
5
New cards

Calculating df

people vs observations (9 people = n) (number of total observations = N) 

<p>people vs observations (9 people = n) (number of total observations = N)&nbsp;</p>
6
New cards

SS total

knowt flashcard image
7
New cards

Calculating between subjects SS

need to know each persons mean (subject mean) *only fill out first two columns for this one (not mean SS or F)

<p>need to know each persons mean (subject mean) *only fill out first two columns for this one (not mean SS or F) </p><p></p>
8
New cards

Why dont we fill out SS or F for between subjects variability?

All it would tell us is that people in the sample are on average different from each other, which is almost always going to be the case so it’s not that interesting

9
New cards

Repeated measures SS

Mean for each observation period 

  • Whatever is repeated = time 

<p>Mean for each observation period&nbsp;</p><ul><li><p>Whatever is repeated = time&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

Error SS

knowt flashcard image
11
New cards

Calculating mean SS

Dividing SS by df

12
New cards

Mean ss

Devide mean squared by the error term

  • Now you can use the table (is it higher than the f critical)

13
New cards

What happens when you look at the table and the value is bigger than f critical

The means are different from eachother 

14
New cards

What would happen if you used a between subjects ANOVA

Total SS and repeated SS would be the same would be the same

  • Error would be different 

  • We can remove the variance due to individual differences which makes our error term smaller and have more power 

15
New cards

Why are btwn subjects stronger than independent or vise versa  

We can remove the variance due to individual differences which makes our error term smaller and have more power 

16
New cards

What are the three assumptions in a repeated measure

This test will work properly if…

  1. Observations are normally distributed

  2. Population variances are equal (homogeneity of variance)

  3. Observations are no longer independent → Compound sphericity of the variance and covariations matrix

What does this mean: At each time period you can compute a variance (diaginal)

17
New cards

What does Compound sphericity of the variance and covariations matrix mean?

Compound sphericity of the variance and covariations matrix

<p>Compound sphericity of the variance and covariations matrix </p><p></p>
18
New cards

Correlation vs Covariance 

Covariance: the strength of the relationship between one variable and another (post and pre = pre and post, making it semetrical) → if the test is nonsignificant, it means all of them are the same, if it is significant, the test is violated

This assumption is often violated

  • Similar to how variance and sd are if you now one you know the otehr 

  • Same as correlation and covariance 

19
New cards

Mochlys Test of Sphericity

Are covariances equal of not 

  • For eg if p=.274 (bigger than 0.05) it is non significant meaning covariances are equal (not statistically different) 

  • Use sherisity assumed line

<p>Are covariances equal of not&nbsp;</p><ul><li><p>For eg if p=.274 (bigger than 0.05) it is non significant meaning covariances are equal (not statistically different)&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>Use sherisity assumed line </p></li></ul><p></p>
20
New cards

Greenhouse-Geisser

Used if Mauchly’s test is significant

If the compound symmetry assumption is violated, using F-test that assumes compound symmetry can inflate the type 1 error rate (have an effect when you don’t)

  • Adjusts the df (fewer df)

<p>Used if Mauchly’s test is significant </p><p>If the compound symmetry assumption is violated, using F-test that assumes compound symmetry can inflate the type 1 error rate (have an effect when you don’t)</p><ul><li><p>Adjusts the df (fewer df) </p></li></ul><p></p>