1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Correlational studies
Observation of naturally occurring variation
No manipulation
Often less invasive
Cannot establish causation
Experimental studies*
Manipulation of variables
Conducted in natural or
Independent variable*
What is causing your behaviour
A biotic or abiotic factor that is manipulated to test for an effect
Dependent variables*
The effect
How a specific behaviour affected by the independent variable
Confounding factors*
One or more variables that affect both the independent and dependent variable
Can introduce bias and make it difficult o determine id an observed effect really is caused by the independent variable
We must
Cross-sectional studies*
Measures many different individuals at a single point in time
Pro: fast to run, no risk of loosing subjects due to dropout, death. etc
Con: Cannot separate stable, trait-like patterns from a transient state
Longitudinal studies*
Carryoverr effect?*
Between-subject design*
Each animal receives only one treatment
Different animals are compared to each other
Pro: There is no risk of carry-over between conditions since no animal receives
Within-subject design (repeated measures)*
Natural experiments*
Strenght:
Real-world scale, real world scenario
Often large effect sizes
Randomisation
Prevents systematic bias
Randomly assign animals to treatment groups before the experiment
For repeated testing: randomise the order of treatments
Blinding
Ideally the scorer of the behaviour should not know which treatment each animal received
Unconscious expectations biases measurements
How do you choose your sample size?*
Consider:
Statistical power
Ethical considerations
Reality
Calculate your sample size before your experiment
What is power? how do you calculate it?
What is power affected by?*
Sample size
Pseudoreplication*
True replication*
*
*
*
*
*
*