1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
why study pop and higher order units?
indivs act in space, it is not interesting on its own unless interacting with other orgs
interaction is whats important and interesting
what happens above the indiv level
most interesting dynamics concerning biota in a spatial context
community
an assemblage of interacting orgs or pop within an ecosystem
ecological community
a group of trophically similar, sympatric sp that actually or potentially compete/facilitate/predate/mate in a local area for the same or similar resources
ecological community examples
plants
invertebrate
fish
bird
are communities static
no because of co-occuring processes
what are some co-occuring processes that affect communities
dispersal - moving around
disturbance - hurricanes, fires, flood
community assembly
an unceasing process of sp arrivals, persistance, increase, decrease and extinctions played out in an individualistic (indiv sp) way
dynamics is essential to this def
niche assembly
communities are groups of interacting sp whose presence/absence and realtive abundance can be deduced from assembly rules that are based on ecological niches or functional roles of each sp
assembly rules
ecological laws build in
have to follow a certain order to get the community you observe or restoration in a given area
based on ecological niches
what does niche assembly predict
stable or equilibrium assemblage of particular sp
dispersal assembly
communities are open, non-equilibrium assemblages of sp thrown together by chance
ever changing and come and go at random
more based on chance than small scale things
no distinct rules
presence/absence is dictated by random dispersal, speciation, and stochastic local extinction
examples of dispersal assembly
island biogeography
unified neutral theory of diversity
competition
occurs when 2 or more pop compete for common resource (food or territory) and is limited
intraspecific
same species compete
interspecific
indivs of diff sp compete
competitive exclusion
no 2 sp can exist on same limiting resource in same place, one will cause extinction of another
scramble competition
occurs when 2 or more pop use the same limited resources, competition is indirect or accidental
contest competition
direct interaction btwn indiv , often aggressive
allelopathy or territorial
coexistence
rule in nature
species coexistence depends on avoiding competition by
use a range of resources
switching diets
living in a diverse enviro with various patches and hiding places
through methods of diffusing competition, what happens
becomes more diffuse
not directly competing all the time
each resource represents a small portion of total resource requirements
resource partitioning
sp avoid niche overlap by partitioning available resources according to size and form, chemical composition, and seasonal availability
example of resource partitioning
gap partition hypothesis
conspecific indiv like certain diff available conditions
others take adv of gap
spacial compeition
in dynamic and patchy enviro, the good dispersers can move quickly into disturbed or poor environment and avoid competition with superior competitors that dominate a good habitat
character displacement
competition btwn 2 sp can be avoided by evolutionary changes
island biogeography theory
equilibrium number of sp on an island is the outcome of a balance btwn immigration of new sp from nearest mainline and extinction of sp on island
try and predict diversity
two key assumptions of island biogeography theory
rate of sp immigration drops
initial high rate of rapidly dispersing sp then drops
slow colonizers dimish over time
rate of extinction rises
more sp, ability to have higher extinction rate
equilibrium number of sp
immigration and extinction cross
dynamic bc sp composition changes through time
changes only a little
sp richness is that equil, not niche-assembly
turnover rate and area relationship
higher area = less turnover
smaller area = higher turnover
island biogeography revision
immigration rates decrease with increasing distance from source area
extinction rate varies inversely with island size
all else being equal, equil number of sp should be higher on near islands
extinction greater on smaller than larger, equil lower on smaller
species area effect
as area increases the number of sp increases
true for islands and mainlands
greater on islands
number of sp doubles when area increases by a factor of 10 on islands
rate of increase in sp richness is lower on mainland
islands isolated so colonization is more difficult
habitat diversity hypothesis
larger areas have more habitats = more sp
tries to explain species area effect
area-alone hypothesis
larger areas should carry more sp regardless of habitat diversity
island biogeo - simberloff and wilson
florida keys
mangrove island
high arthropod species richness on large nearer island
low SR on smaller farther islands
methyl bromide - fogged islands and killed all
SR returned to almost same before fogging
implies some equilibrium number
dispersal into islands was rapid initially and evens out over time
island biogeo - diamond
bird surveys channel island california
1917 and 1968
almost same SR in both surveys
sp composition was diff (30% diff btwn surveys)
equilibrium number of SR but turnover in composition
sp change
island biogeo - krakatau
1883 volcano explosion
new island
increase number of sp, lower rate, higher extinction rate
autochthonous speciation
evolution on the island
criticisms of island biogeography
autochthonous speciation may be significant
immigration rate may depend on island area as well as distance from the course
migrating sp are more likely to encounter a larger island
extinction may depend on distance from source because dwindling sp may be rescued by migrants
habitat diversity will affect sp richness
enviro factors influence diversity
equilibrium number will change with varying enviro conditions
enviro changes occurs as fast as colonization and speciation
relaxation
decrease in number of sp that can be supported in the enviro as the enviro changes
lomolino 2000 proposal
sp richness on small islands is dominated by chance enviro
hurricanes
crossing ecological threshold on larger island
habitat diversity, carrying capacity , extinction, immigration
way over threshold
autochthonous evolution of island endemic bolsters sp numbers
latitudinal sp gradient
high diversity plateau in tropics and drops when going toward both poles
small island effect
diversity governed by stochastic events and lack of habitats
small island - less sp numbers
unified neutral theory of biodiversity
constructed on foundation of island biogeo theory
neutral theory
ex. ecological communities are structured entirely by ecological drift, random migration, and random speciation
dispersal assembly
ecological drift
variability in pop growth rates arising from random diff among indivs in survival and reproduction
neutral theory
treats orgs in the community as essentially identical in their per capita probabilities of giving birth, dying, migrating, and speciating
all indivs follow same rules the same way in the model