1/26
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Name monarchs 1780 to 1930.
George III; George IV; William IV; Victoria; Edward VII; George V
Three ways eighteenth century kings influenced Parliament.
Patronage; sinecures; appointing PMs; controlling boroughs
Why American War increased criticism?
Corruption accusations; inefficient patronage; tax rises
What organisation pushed economical reform?
Yorkshire Association
What was Dunning motion?
1780 motion reducing Crown influence
Why significant?
Commons asserting independence
What did economical reforms do?
Reduced patronage and corruption
Two reforms 1782.
Abolished sinecures; reformed civil list; oversight of spending
Impact of economical reform?
Momentum for reform; limited royal influence
Two changes under Pitt.
Stronger cabinet; tax reform; reduced corruption
Why royal power fell by 1810s?
Economical reform; cabinet growth; George III illness
Early event proving strong patronage?
Pitt appointed 1783
Event 1834 proving limits?
William IV reappointing Melbourne
Impact of Great Reform Act on monarchy?
King bowed to Commons pressure
Three reasons electoral reform reduced power.
Larger electorate; clear party leaders; removal of court boroughs
What crisis 1839?
Bedchamber Crisis
What did it show?
Limited ability to choose PM
How could Victoria still influence?
Choose within majority party; delay appointments
How much policy influence?
Limited and declining
How monarchy gave legitimacy?
Patriotic symbol
Three ways symbolic importance grew.
Empire; jubilees; pageantry; state visits
Phrase for new role?
Constitutional monarchy
What did 1911 crisis show?
Monarch needed but constrained
Later event showing limits?
1924 Labour appointed
How might George V show power?
Considered vetoing Home Rule
Four monarch essay criteria.
Choose PM; influence ministers; influence policy; symbolic power
Four factors declining monarch power.
Economical reform; electoral reform; party development; parliamentary legitimacy; individual monarchs