Evaluation of Juries

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:00 PM on 7/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

8 Terms

1
New cards

What quote is given for the advantage of a jury?

They are the “lamp that shows that freedom lives”.

2
New cards

Advantages of a Jury:

  • Public confidence - everyone is directly involved within the jury system

  • The Juries verdicts are seen as societies at large

  • It is a fundamental part of democracy

  • It is a protection against the state


3
New cards

What did Lord Devlin say a tyrant would do to the jury system?

The first thing a tyrant would do if he came to power would be to abolish the jury system.

4
New cards

Bushel’s Case (1670)

Facts - Two men were charged with riot. The jury refused to convict and the judge was so angry he sent the jury to prison.


Principle - The jury should be independent and return a true verdict without fear of consequence

5
New cards

Ponting (1984)

Facts - D worked for the MOD and sent documents to an MP that was evidence that the government had lied to parliament. D was charged under the Official Secrets Act 1911.


Principle - The jury acquitted him because they approved of his actions. This is known as Juries equity

6
New cards

Why is the secrecy of a Jury room an advantage?

It allows the jury to be free from outside pressure

7
New cards

What are some disadvantages of Juries:

  • Perverse decisions - A verdict that goes against evidence

  • Secrecy of the Jury room - It is unknown how the Jury came to their decision

  • There may be a racial bias or discriminatory bias

  • Media coverage may be able to influence jurors in high-profile cases


8
New cards

Owen (1992)

Facts - D’s son was killed by V by V’s uninsured and unroadworthy truck. V had never passed driving test and blind in one eye. D shot V when he was released from prison for reckless driving. The judge told the jury to put aside feelings of sympathy for D. They acquitted D anyway.


Principle - This was a perverse judgement as the jury went against evidence. Juries should not be unpredictable.