1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Principles of scientific management
Scientifically design work for optimal efficiency "one best way" - belief that managers are born (inherent traits)
Theory X
Workers are lazy. requiring constant supervision
Theory Y
Workers will work hard to meet personal and organizational goals
Theory Z
Consensus decision making, quality circles, holistic concern with workers
decision making
the final choice of action
steps of decision making
Intuition
Trial and error
Analytical Formal Process (Problem Solving)
autocratic leaders
given position of control and they are only person to make a decision
tell other people to do tasks and expected to not be challenged
Democratic leader
A style of leadership where leaders consult with followers who are allowed to participate in decision-making
Laissez-faire leader
A style of leadership where leaders do not interfere or do not provide direction "hands-off" approach
leadership
use of personal traits and power to ethically influence others
management
set of behaviors that provide structure and direction in conducting activities
Transformational leader
has a vision, empowers others, motivates as a role model and is creative
transactional leader
sets goals, gives direction and reward/punishments, emphasizes process and controls situation (management tasks)
Emotional Intelligence
Self awareness, Self regulation, Motivation, Empathy, Social skills
authentic
In order to lead, leaders must be true to themselves and their values and act accordingly
servant
Serving others is critical to success of leaders
“To be a great leader – you must first be a servant”
Listen and understand; choose words carefully, open minded, deal with ambiguity, foresight and intuition
Strength Based
“Positive organizational scholarship”
-Common ground
-Continuous learning
-Collaborative relationships
Focus on the empowerment of individuals’ strengths vs identifying problems
Tools to improve decision making
SWOT
Delphi method
intrapersonal conflict
Conflict within a person
interpersonal conflict
Conflict between people: Not everyone sees the world the way we do
intragroup conflict
conflict within a group
Avoiding
Accommodating
Competing
Negotiating
Collaborating
What are the 5 types of conflict resolution?
Avoiding
Withdrawn; unassertive; ignore conflict
Use:
Trivial issues
Negative results are greater than benefits
When need to “cool Down”
No chance to obtain needs
Accommodating
Competing
Pursue own needs at expense of others
Use power, creativeness, and strategies to “WIN”
Use:
Quick decision/action
Individual is right about issues that are vital to group welfare
Important unpopular actions needs to be taken
Negotiating
Involves assertiveness/cooperation
Requires SKILL, Compromise involves a “middle position”
Use:
Temporary solutions to complex issues need to be implemented
Two powerful sides are committed strongly to goals
Conflicting goals are “moderately important
Time pressure to expedite a solution
Collaborating
Creative: both assertive and cooperative
Satisfies all parties
Works towards a mutual goal: interprofessional team work
Use:
Seeking creative strategies to problem
Greater understanding and empathy
Balance of power between self and others
When merging vastly different opinions
win/win
Who wins?
Collaboration
Lose/win
Who wins?
Accommodation
Lose/lose
Who wins?
Avoiding
Win/lose
Who wins?
Competing
No one wins
Who wins?
Negotiating
How to respond to conflict
calm, I statements, watch non-verbals
Stage 1: Latent Conflict
Actual conflict not yet developed although issues become apparent that conflict may occur
Hidden frustration may begin to surface
Unfortunately some issues may be hidden for years but never resurface
Sometimes issues come without warning
Example: Policies are implemented without prior notification to employees
Stage 2: Perceived Conflict
Parties are aware of conflict yet symptoms or manifestations may not be present
Not all parties experience emotions simultaneously
Example: Misunderstanding of someone’s position on an issue-scheduling or assignments
Stage 3: Felt Conflict
Parties involved begin to feel a response to the conflict-emotionally involved
Once perceived emotions surface: stress, anxiety, frustration, hostility
Example: Discrimination can be intentional or unintentional. It can be based on personal biases or institutional policies. It can occur in workplaces, schools, and public spaces. A real-life is the pay gap between men and women in the United States, which is caused by a combination of personal biases and institutional policies
Stage 4: Manifest Conflict
Action is taken
Can be positive or negative
Statements, actions or reactions
Goal: Healthy conflict resolution Negative: shutdown, withdrawal, competing
Example: Staff agree to change scheduling process with group of affected individuals
Stage 5: Conflict Aftermath
Completion of conflict
Positive or negative In one time conflict events this may be the culmination
Example: Positive: Satisfied parties can work together to resolve problem
Negative: No acceptable solution and tensions continue to rise
Audits – structure, process, outcomes – what is evaluated?
Structure—monitor the structure or setting in which patient care occurs
Audits
Outcome—determine what results, if any, followed from specific nursing interventions for patients
Audits
Process—measure the process of care or how the care was carried out
Benchmarking
The process of measuring products, practices, or services against best-performing organizations
patients' perceptions of their hospital care
What do HCAHPS surveys measure?
Pay for performance (P4P) Program
Introduced to Improve the quality and safety of healthcare
Program introduced by Medicare
The Joint Commission
The major accrediting body for healthcare organizations and programs in the United States
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Plays an active role in setting standards for and measuring quality in health care including pay for performance.
Managing aggressive or inappropriate communication
Reflect – “I understand…”
Repeat the Assertive message – I am willing to discuss….
Point out the implicit assumptions – Listening closely and reaffirming key points
Restate the message – Change from “you” statements to “I” statements
Question – When aggressor use non-verbal cues, do you understand them correctly?
Crucial conversations
2 or more people involved
Stakes are high
Emotionally charged
There is a difference in opinion
Developmental Dimensions, Inc. (DDI) Approach to Handling a Difficult Conversation
Open
Clarify
Develop
Agree
Close
Assertive
Conversation style: advocates for what is wanted, direct, honest, “I” statements
CUS
I am concerned
Help me to understand or I am uncomfortable
It is a safety issue
“I need clarity”