1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Role of protolith composition vs geologic conditions in producing equilibrium metamorphic mineral assemblages
Rocks develop stable mineral assemblages under specific P, T, X at thermodynamic/chemical equilibrium
Relict (pre-metamorphic) or alteration minerals NOT included
Mineral Paragenesis
equilibrium mineral assemblage
Textural means for assessing equilibrium in metamorphic systems
No obvious signs of reaction or disequilibrium texturesÂ
All mineral phases present are in physical contactÂ
inclusions likely not in equilibrium with matrix phases
Lack of layering
Textural equilibrium attained -Â
Protolith textures completely replaced by metamorphic textures
The aluminosilicate (Al2SiO5) triple point diagram
At 0.4 Gba and 500 degrees celsius
Kyanite in right left corner, sillimanite in other, and andalusite on the bottom
Goldschmidts phase rule
P<C- for equilibrium to be true
System displays solid solution
P > C
F < 2 – systems represents an univariant curve (F = 1) or invariant point (F = 0)
Equilibrium has not been attained
Number of components not chosen correctly
Strategies for selecting the adequate number of chemical components to plot graphically
for a given metamorphic rock
Need to choose enough components to represent all major minerals present
individual elements or oxides
Ignore components that are a) only present in trace amounts or components that only enter a single phase, or mobile components (e.g., volatiles)
Combine components that behave similarly (e.g., Mg and Fe in solid solution)
Limit rock types being shown (less chemical variability shown, the better)
ProjectionsÂ
Eskola
Concluded different mineral assemblages corresponded to different P-T regimes called facies
different mineral assemblages in chemically identical metamafic rocks
descriptive meaning vs interpretive meaning
Descriptive - metamorphic facies corresponds to a set of repeatable mineral associations/assemblages
Interpretive - metamorphic facies corresponds to different relative P-T conditions
Low P/T facies
Zeolite Facies, Albite-Epidote Hornfels Facies, Hornblende Hornfels Facies, Pyroxene Hornfels Facies. Sanidinite Facies
Common in Contact Metamorphic Settings (static P, med-hi T)
Medium P/T facies
Common in Orogenic Belts (lo-med P, lo-hi T)
Zeolite Facies, Prehnite-Pumpellyite Facies, Greenschist Facies, Amphibolite Facies, Granulite Facies
gneiss development and partial melting (i.e., migmatization) common
High P/T facies
Common in Subduction Zones (med-hi P, lo-med T)
(Zeolite Facies), Blueschist Facies, Eclogite Facies
Metamorphic processes at subduction zones
increasing pressure and temperature, which causes the minerals in the rocks to change into new forms - vary with depth, leading to distinct metamorphic processes
production of paired metamorphic belts
direct consequence of the varying pressure-temperature conditions at different depths and regions of the subduction zone
Low-Temperature, High-Pressure Belt (Blueschist Facies)Â
High-Pressure, High-Temperature Belt (Eclogite Facies)
igneous processes at subduction zones
Subducted plate shoved under overriding plate - Melting in overlying mantle wedge due to rising fluids from slab
Generated melts rise, fractionate, interact with overriding plate, and may eventually erupt
Oceanic SZ - Mostly produced volcanic rocks and rocks with mafic to intermediate compositions
Continent SZ - intermediate to felsic extrusive and intrusive igneous rocks
Textural and mineralogical reactivity of basaltic protoliths
Texture - Fine grains become coarse and vesicles collapse
Mineralogical - volcanic glasses breakdown, any H2O from hydration is released
Tectonic implications of P-T(-t) paths of different shapes
Clockwise - common in regional settings - subduction and collision
Boomerang - common in contact settings - plutons
Counterclockwise - common in select granulite facies settings - proximal to intruding plutonsÂ
Polymorphic mineral reactions
Chemistry of phases doesn’t change, but structure does
Coexisting polymorphs represent incomplete transformations
Exsolution mineral reactions
Unmixing of two phases (typically in the same mineral family) upon cooling or decompression
Commonly results in exsolution lamellae
Solid-Solid Net Transfer mineral reactions
mineral products are chemically different from mineral reactants
Devolatilization mineral reactions
Influenced not only by P-T conditions, but also by composition of fluid (Xfluid) present
Continuous mineral reactions
occur over a range of temperatures depending on composition of phases present with respect to their chemical endmembers
Most common in Fe-Mg silicates
Ion exchange mineral reactions
involving the exchange of select ions between components
Redox mineral reactions
Reactions involving changing oxidation state of a particular ion
Influenced by oxygen content
multiple mineral polymorphs in the same metamorphic rock
varied P-T conditions the rock has experienced during metamorphism
common in tectonically active regions, such as subduction zones
Aluminosilicate most common
Geologic fluid composition (i.e., H2O-CO2 content) impact on (P-)T of devolatilization
plays a crucial role in determining the P-T conditions at which devolatilization occurs
Water systems generally lead to devolatilization at lower temperatures and pressures
COâ‚‚ systems promote devolatilization at higher temperatures and pressures
Importance of calculating P-T conditions of metamorphism
interpreting the geological history of rocks, understanding tectonic processes, and predicting the stability and transformation of minerals
framework for reconstructing the thermal and pressure evolution of metamorphic terrains
Geobarometry vs geothermometry
GeobarometryÂ
Geobarometers- geologic pressure constraints
GASP’ Barometer: Ca-garnet + kyanite + quartz → Ca-plagioclase
GeothermometryÂ
Geothermometers - geologic T constraints)
Garnet-Biotite Thermometer:
Annite (Fe-biotite) + Pyrope (Mg-garnet) → Phlogopite (Mg-biotite) + Almandine (Fe-garnet
Pelite
mudstone or shale - mostly clay and micas
Along continental margins
Textural and mineralogical reactivity of pelitic protoliths
Fine-grain sizes coarsen in response to increasing metamorphic grade
 Original clays and micas readily breakdown and dehydrate in response to increasing metamorphic grade
Results in extensive changes to mineralogy in response to metamorphism
KFMASH
K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O
KFMASH strengths and weaknesses
Strengths - includes all major oxides
micas, garnet, staurolite, kyanite, sillimanite, chlorite, and feldspar
Weaknesses - may not represents all minerals - no calcium or sodium - cannot show plag
General temperature conditions and mineral reactions associated with anatexis of
metapelites
between 650°C to 800°C
5 to 10 kbar
role of anatexis in producing migmatite
Migmatites typically occur at conditions where the temperature is high enough for partial melting to occur but not high enough to fully melt the rock. This means that the rock undergoes partial anatexis, where some minerals melt while others remain solid
Igneous processes associated with anatexis
Partial melting of crust - need either thickened crust or increased heat flow
Caused by H2O liberation from breakdown of micas in metasedimentary rocks