Comparison of 1929-32 and 1924-28 in terms of political stability
In comparison of early Weimar years and 1929-32, the years 1924-28 can be interpreted as a time of political stability
Summary of political violence in these years
Political violence receded and there were no attempts by extremist groups to overthrow the Republic by force
Parties of the extreme left and extreme right suffered a loss of support in the elections of these years
What did the election of Hindenburg show
The election of Hindenburg in 1925 can also be seen as a sign that traditional conservatives were beginning to adapt and accommodate to the new reality of a democratic republic
Summary of the weaknesses in the Weimar political system
Weaknesses in the political system remained
Stable cabinets were as elusive as they had been in the post-war years
Parties represented narrow sectional interests - making it difficult for politicians with a national appeal and national programme to emerge
Summary of political divides within Weimar
Although Weimar Republic’s politicians understood the need to compromise in order to establish coalition governments
Their parties however and the interests of those they represented, placed severe constraints on their freedom of action
Summary of coalition governments
Due to political divides were fragile and temporary alliances
Even in the favourable circumstances of 1924-28, stable governments proved impossible to achieve and respect for democratic institutions was further eroded