1/20
cognitive - locus of control / Sociocultural - vulnerability models
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Etiologies
the cause or set of reasons behind a mental health disorder (PTSD)
explains why disorder develops
Cognitive etiology locus of control
whether people believe they have control over their own lives (internal LOC) or if external forces (fate/luck) dictate their life outcomes (external LOC)
internal locus of control
people with an internal locus of control tend to take responsability for their actions more, are less influenced by others, and have a stronger sense of self-efficacy
external locus of control
shift the blame to outside forces, credit luck or chance for success, and are more prone to experiencing learned helplessness
can cause higher chance of PTSD because they tend to feel more helpless when experiencing/witnessing trauma
PTSD
a mental health disorder triggered by experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event
symptoms include affective (mood/emotional), behavioural (repetitive behaviours), cognitive (disruptions to memory), and somatic (physical symptoms)
aim of ratzer et al
to investigate if the type of LOC is a predictor for PTSD
method of ratzer et al
52 pp who were admitted to intensive care unit after traumatic injury
longitudinal study of 6 months
pp given tests to measure both level of PTSD onset symptoms and find which LOC they had
results of ratzer et al
19.2% of pp developed PTSD symptoms over 6 months
significant correlation between those with external LOC and the onset of PTSD symptoms
conclusion of ratzer et al
external locus of control is a predictor for PTSD because there was a signficiant correlation between the pp who had an external LOC and the development of onset PTSD
link back of ratzer et al
this could be because pp with external LOC tend to feel more helpless when experiencing/witnessing trauma
which could result in onset of PTSD
eval of ratzer et al
pp not actually diagnosed with PTSD but instead researchers relied on results of a questionnaire
possible that other traumas experienced by individuals before their accident may have played a role in the onset of PTSD symptoms
longitudinal design of six months is same amount of time DSM-5 says is needed before diagnosing PTSD
cognitive etiology eval
high ecological validity as research tends to be on pp who have already experienced trauma
lack of generalisability as most traumas are impossible to replicate
correlational studies which lack causation so other factors could influence development of PTSD
low internal validity as there is no control over pp daily activity so some pp could discuss their trauma more often than others which may increase or decrease the likelihood of PTSD
Sociocultural etiology: vulnerability models
when there are more risk factors in the environment than protective factors, then someone is more likely to develop a disorder
Risk factors for PTSD in vulnerability models
female gender, low socioeconomic status, or previous trauma exposure are consistently found with higher PTSD symptom levels
lack of social support post-trauma is most significant risk factor
Luby aim
to investigate whether poverty experienced in early childhood impacts brain development and to explore mediators of this effect
method of luby
145 right handed children recruited from large sample of 10 year longitudinal preschool depression study
cognitively and socially assessed yearly for 3 to 6 years
then pp had two MRI scans, one of whole brain and one of amygdala + hippocampus areas
support or hostility of primary caregiver was also noted
presence of stressful life experiences was also noted
MRI scans measured brain volumes of white and grey matter and volumes of hippocampus + amygdala
results of luby
poverty was associated with less white and grey matter in brain and with smaller hippocampus and amygdala volumes
if caregiver was supportive or hostile mediated effects of poverty on both hippocampi
stressful life events affected volume of left hippocampus only
conclusion of luby
in conclusion, poverty experienced in early childhood impacted brain development because the amygdala and hippocampus of children in poverty had smaller volumes
link back for luby
if the caregiver was supportive then it mediated the poverty effects on the brain which could limit the chance of PTSD development
a lower socioeconomic status could result in poverty
eval of luby
while the study sample was large, it was taken from depression study database so children likely already had depression which could have affected brain volume and affected the generalizability of the findings
could be some bidirectional ambiguity as unsure if the poverty causes the brain volume changes or if caregiver response causes the brain volume changes which reduces internal validity
study was 6 year longitudinal which increases the credibility of the results and allows the researchers to examine long term effects of poverty
eval of vulnerability models etiology
holistic research identifies both protective and risk factors, so prioritises prevention over treatment
high ecological validity
studies are usually longitudinal
research is usually correlational
theories are descriptive rather than explanatory so don’t explain origin of disorder