1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Ethics
Involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior
Character: what person I ought to become
Hollistic
Morality
Custom: What type of actions in particularly are right or wrong?
Action
Meta-ethics
Investigates our moral principles and concepts
Normative ethics
Determining standards for right conduct
Norms
Deontology
Duty-Based Ethics
Moral duty is the central principle
Consequenialism
Any moral theory that the consequences of our actions play a central role in our evaluation of moral conduct
EX: Utilitarianism
Non-Consequatialism
The consequences are seen as morally irrelevant
Kant
What is good without limitation?
Fame?
NOPE, famous school shooters
Money?
NOPE, criminals trying to get money
Pleasure?
NOPE, not wanting to go to class for the pleasure of sleeping in
Compassion?
NOPE, scholarships and tax-breaks used
Justice?
NOPE, segregation laws —> But the law wasn’t just?
The Good Will, Kant
The desire to do good
Even if you are unavailable/make a mistake, the intention is still good
“A species of causality in living beings insofar as they are rational”
Actions in conformity with reasons
Autonomous (Free)
The Good Will is a response to Rational DutyIm
Imperative
A command
All imperatives are expressed by an “ought”
2 types of Imperatives:
A hypothetical Imperative
Problematic Practical Principle (for some purpose)
“If then situtations”, in order to , you have to __
Assertoric Practical Principle (for something actual)
“Get ready for bed, brush your teeth”
Categorical Imperatives, moral
An action as objectively necessary, an apodictic practical principle
This is the imperative of morality
Rational = Non-contradictory
Contradiction = to affirm and deny any X simultaneously
A categorical imperative is a command to act that is universally obligatory for all human actions in all circumstances and cannot be contradictory
The Categorical Imperative- 5 formula
The formula of the Natural Law (The Principle of Universalizability)**
“Act only on the maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”
EX: “Lie to your wife if it makes her happy” —> Contradiction
Telling the truth is a universal categorical imperative
The formula of the End in itself (The Principle of Humanity)**
“Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end”
Don’t use people
EX: Consider other human beings on themselves and not their value; Soldiers aren’t treated simply as a means —> We retrieve their bodies
Perfect Duties
We have a perfect duty not to act by maxims that result in logical contradictions when we attempt to universalize them
ex: stealing
Imperfect duties
The duty to act only by maxims that we would desire to be universalized. This duty is not as strong as a perfect unity, but is morally binding, because it ultimately depends upon subjective preferences— and these change with regard to culture, time, place
EX; giving
Problems with Kant’s Deontology
Are we really free to act?
Freedom
Is reason sufficient to motivate actions?
Autonomy
What is we are inherently egoistic? If so, could the good will really be possible?
Psychology
But don’t the consequences matter?
Nazi Officer, hiding jews in your barn —> officer asks, but Kant says u have to be honest —> problematic?
Friendship and Partiality
Moral Intuition
The problem of moral luck
Moral Judgements appear arbitrary
Kant's first form of the categorical imperative is derived from the idea that moral obligation as universally binding. (T/F)
True
The reason why it is wrong to make a lying promise, according to Kant, is because this act cannot be willed as a general practice without contradiction. (T/F)
True
"Act only on that maxim you can will to become universal law" is known as which form of Kant's categorical imperative?
First
Hypothetical imperatives are
Like suggesting we should use what works to arrive at a goal.
Which of the following best paraphrases Kant's second form of the categorical imperative?
Don't use people unless it is in their best interest. |