Analytical Forensic Toxicology Exam 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/124

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

GCMS, Derivatization, LLE

Last updated 3:48 AM on 1/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

125 Terms

1
New cards

internal standard addition

always after dilution to ensure same amount in each sample

2
New cards

internal standard properties

mirror analyte behavior, not already present in sample, can be separated via chromatogram or mass, does not react with analyte, soluble and stable in diluent, accurately added to samples

3
New cards

how to choose a method

AMR chosen and capability of instrument

4
New cards

AMR

analytical measured range

5
New cards

AMR def

range you can quantitate and report a value based on method validation

6
New cards

internal standard purpose

verification, identification, quantitation

7
New cards

internal standard verification

deemed by successful extraction

8
New cards

internal standard identification

identify compound through retention time comparison 

9
New cards

internal standard quantitation

calibration curve

10
New cards

verify before report

calibration % dev, controls in range, negative blanks, no carryover, ion ratios, itsd recover, retention time, rrt, chromatography

11
New cards

internal standard for non specific detector

similar structure, not found in sample, no shared common ion, same extraction, acceptable chromatogram 

12
New cards

internal standard for mass spec

isotopically labeled version if analyte or matched

13
New cards

matched isotope 

adding deuterium

14
New cards

internal standard accounts for 

any loss in sample

15
New cards

standard addition

generate quant results within sample instead of performing external

16
New cards

standard addition common use

no validated method to run sample, difficult matrix like liver tissues

17
New cards

low pka=

stronger acid=donates proton more

18
New cards

pH variable dependent on 

matrix and/or extraction solvent

19
New cards

ionization formation ideal

2 pH units away from pKa

20
New cards

amphoteric compounds

has both acidic and basic groups, act as either

21
New cards

zwitterion

has both a pos and neg charge at the same time

22
New cards

direct analysis sample prep types

enzyme immunoassay, headspace

23
New cards

dilute and shoot pros

simple, cheap, easy, reduce viscosity

24
New cards

dilute and shoot cons

potential loss of recovery by diluting analyte, doesn’t remove contaminants,

25
New cards

protein precipitation

dilution and take out matrix components by denaturing proteins

26
New cards

protein precipitation con

doesn’t take out chemical contaminants/interference

27
New cards

partition coefficient 

tendency for any species to prefer to be in one chemical phase over another after equilibrium

28
New cards

partition coefficient formula

conc in phase 2/ conc in phase 1

29
New cards

partition coefficient for high recovery

as high and as different as possible

30
New cards

types of extraction 

LLE, SPE, SLE, PLD

31
New cards

LLE

liquid liquid extraction

32
New cards

SPE

solid phase extraction

33
New cards

SPE process

sample enters syringe column bed, different liquids are passed through to elute desired target or just the analyte

34
New cards

SPE pros

selectivity, flexibility, high automation potential

35
New cards

SLE

supported liquid extraction

36
New cards

SLE process

one liquid flows through solid support in column trapping some compounds, extracting liquid flows through taking target to collection

37
New cards

PLD

phospholipid depletion

38
New cards

LLE steps

strong base convert analyte, analyte leaves aqueous, mixing and separating layers, isolate layer with compound, run on instrument or dry down

39
New cards

LLE affected by

pH, temperature, affinity for solvent, affinity for matrix, relative volumes, number of extraction steps, immiscibility of phases

40
New cards

LLE three aspects to consider

matrices, the solvents, the analyte

41
New cards

LLE back extraction use

3 layer to increase purity 

42
New cards

LLE back extraction layers

add base to neutralize and migrate organic, add acid to attract to aqueous, add base

43
New cards

LLE cons

limited selectivity, difficulty of automation, emulsions

44
New cards

LLE pros

rapid method development, simplicity

45
New cards

emulsions

sample contains high level surfactants that prevent clean separation

46
New cards

fixing emulsions

sample sit, acidify the sample, add table sat, filter sodium sulfate, breakup and centrifuge, ultrasonic bath, change the extraction type

47
New cards

derivatization limitation

can make the molecule too large to volatize 

48
New cards

derivatization requirements

heat, time, catalyst, removal of reactant 

49
New cards

derivatization goal

chemically react with problematic molecule in native form and convert to gc acceptable form 

50
New cards

derivatization outcomes

improve chromatogram, differentiate optical isomers, create charge for LCMS

51
New cards

GC pros

most successful chromatogram, cheap, robust

52
New cards

gc main contaminants

oxygen, moisture, hydrocarbon 

53
New cards

GC process

cold sample passes through hot inlet and condenses onto column, oven heats column to provide movement with carrier gas through to detector

54
New cards

septum purge

tiny flow rate to blow away debris

55
New cards

Splitless flow

slow rate, goes through liner, everything onto column

56
New cards

splitless cons

broader bands (higher B), more time for anaytes to breakdown or adsorb 

57
New cards

split injection liner

tapered liner

58
New cards

split flow

high rate, takes sample with gas to split vent

59
New cards

split pros

larger quantities, preserve column capacity

60
New cards

split ratio

sample waste: sample to column, high ratio= lower amount of sample enters

61
New cards

split flow peak affect

high flow= sharper peaks 

62
New cards

on column use

thermally labile compounds (can’t be heated/explosive)

63
New cards

on column flow and temp

slow flow rate, inlet temp=same as column

64
New cards

on column requirements

specific syringe, wider bore column

65
New cards

Headspace injection types

purge and trap, SPME

66
New cards

SPME

solid phase micro extractions

67
New cards

purge and trap process

push gas into sample, force gas out to be collected in trap, put onto column after a bit

68
New cards

SPME process

sample absorbs into needle/fiber from liquid or gas, fiber introduced to injection port

69
New cards

SPME pros

minimal sample prep, no solvent, different fibers

70
New cards

heated oven purpose

maintain precise control over column temp and changes

71
New cards

Types of oven temp

isothermal, program, zones, ranges, design

72
New cards

oven temperature affects

volatility and flow rate through the column 

73
New cards

Chromatography theory

retention dictated by the relative amount of time spent in the stationary phase compared to mobile phase

74
New cards

low affinity to stationary elution effect

short elution, low retention time

75
New cards

system prevention of band broadening

column fittings to inlet and detector reduce dead volume to minimal levels

76
New cards

column efficiency

relative measure of ability to generate clearly resolved peaks

77
New cards

More theoretical plates means

more separation= better resolution

78
New cards

longitudinal diffusion on flow rate

small diffusion= increase flow rate

79
New cards

mass transfer

time analyte equilibrates between two phases before moving to the next plate

80
New cards

GC parameters

temperature, gas flow, carrier gas, injection port liner, injection mode, detector, acquisition

81
New cards

column dimensions

length, diameter, film thickness, temperature, stationary phase

82
New cards

small internal diameter pro

highest efficiency, shorter time, highly complex samples

83
New cards

longer column pro

high resolution

84
New cards

longer column cons

too much time, more expensive

85
New cards

resolution def

ability to distinguish two closely related and/or eluting chromatographic peaks

86
New cards

bigger diameter effects

dec efficiency, inc loadng capacity, inc flow rate, inc analysis time

87
New cards

thicker column effects

longer retention time, lower resolution, broader peak, good capacity

88
New cards

shark fin peak

capacity overloaded, fronting, shape distorted

89
New cards

tailing peak

asymmetrical, from active site at injection or column

90
New cards

gc maintenance 

change liner, wool, septum, and column or clip 

91
New cards

gcms contamination source

fingerprints, air leak, cleaning solvents, column bleed, dirty materials

92
New cards

Retention time locking 

use known molecule with known rt on GC, the instrument will adjust pressure to return molecule to the correct time

93
New cards

isomers differentiation 

fragment the same, only differentiate through retention time

94
New cards

fix column bleed

install new column when background noise gets really high

95
New cards

why choose derivatization

Enhance detectability, enhance excitability, stabilize components, increase retention, reduce retention, improve sensitivity, improve gc/ms appearance, bulk weight

96
New cards

which step to derivatize

can be performed at any steps

97
New cards

flash derivatization

occurs very last minute, within injection port

98
New cards

Mass spec instrument components

sample introduction, transfer region, high vacuum, pumps, ionization source, analyzer, detector, data processor

99
New cards

GCMS diagram

see photo

100
New cards

electron ionization

disrupt electron cloud to cause loss of an electron and create a radical cation