Psychology unit 4

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 25 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/56

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

57 Terms

1
New cards
Learning
A change in behavior due to experience
FRQ; Examples must mention both the change in behavior & the experience that caused it.
2
New cards
Habituation(in the brain)
Simple form of adaptive learning where an organism stops paying attention to stimuli that are often repeated and don't signal anything important
3
New cards
Classical Conditioning
The learning of involuntary emotional &/or physiological reactions through involuntary association.
4
New cards
(Ivan) Pavlov's Dogs
Founded Classical Conditioning.
Used a bell, food, and salivation. The dog would get food and salivate and then would ring the bell and the dog wouldn't salivate. The dog would then be given both the bell and food at the same time. The dog makes an involuntary association and salivates to the sound of the bell.
5
New cards
Unconditioned Stimulus (US or UCS)
A natural/unlearned stimulus that effects a natural/reflexive/involuntary response. Ex. Food
6
New cards
Unconditioned response (Ur or UCR)
The natural/reflexive/involuntary reaction (emotional &/or physiological) Ex. Salivation
7
New cards
Neutral stimulus (NS)
Prior to pairing/association, the NS does not elicit the UR or CR on its own Ex. Bell
8
New cards
Conditioned Stimulus (CS)
A Stimulus that an organism has learned to associate with the unconditioned stimulus. Ex. Bell
9
New cards
Conditioned Response
The learned reaction (emotion &/or physiological) to the CS
10
New cards
John B. Watson's "Little Albert" Study
9-month old albert was shown a variety of animals and items. However when a white rat was shown the experimenter would make a loud noise and Albert would become scared. Albert made the association of loud noise to the rat and is now scared of the rat. UCS-Loud noise UCR- Fear NS- White Rat CS- White rat CR- Fear.
11
New cards
Acquisition
The pairing stage NS+UCS (Food and Bell at same time)
12
New cards
Extinction
After UCS is no longer presented, the association becomes weaker and eventually disappears(CS will no longer elicit CR)
13
New cards
Spontaneous Recovery
After Extinction, one presentation of the CS elicits the CR
14
New cards
Stimulus Generalization
Stimuli similar to CS also elicit the CR
15
New cards
Phobias
Irrational Fears
16
New cards
Stimulus Discrimination
Only CS elicits the Cr
17
New cards
Higher-Order conditioning
"Chain Reaction" Secondary CS can predict (through learned association) the primary CS, which predicts the UCS
18
New cards
Contingency Factors(Rescorla)
NS+UCS is better than UCS+NS
19
New cards
CF; timing
best if UCS follows the NS by no more than a few seconds
20
New cards
CF: Predictability
Need to consistently pair the NS w/UCS & use NS to signal UCS
21
New cards
CF; Signal Strength
Increase strength of stimulus=stronger association (more quickly=Stronger)
22
New cards
CF; Attention
Stimulus that becomes the CS is whatever the organism pays the most attention to
23
New cards
Biopreparedness(Seligman)
We have biological predispositions to make certain associations(e.g. nausea, pain, strong emotional responses
24
New cards
Taste Aversion(Garcia)
*Eat food + get sick= don't want to think/see/smell the food
*Chemotherapy & Taste Aversions
*Doesn't follow the contingency model(e.g. Timing)
25
New cards
Operant Conditioning
Without change in behavior as a result of consequences(Associating a behavior with a consequence) good & bad
26
New cards
B.F. Skinner & the Skinner Box (operant Chamber)
Rat is in a box with an electric grid, button, light, and food outside of the box. The current is running through the rats body and it only stops when they press the button. When they press the button the obtain food. Button pressing increases. Both PR and NR
27
New cards
Reinforcement
A consequence that increases likelihood of a behavior will occur again (strengthen response)
28
New cards
Primary v Secondary (conditioned reinforcer)
Primary & Secondary
29
New cards
PvS; Primary
Naturally reinforcing, i.e. there is no learning necessary for them to be reinforcing satisfies a biological need. Ex: food and water
30
New cards
Positive Reinforcement (add)
Adding something desirable to increase/strengthen a behavior
31
New cards
Negative Reinforcement (Take Away)
Removal/take away something undesirable to increase/strengthen a behavior
32
New cards
Escape Conditioning (type of NR)
Learning a behavior to end an unpleasant situation/stimulus (that you are already exposed to)
33
New cards
Avoidance Conditioning (type of NR)
Learning a behavior to prevent exposure to an unpleasant situation/stimulus
34
New cards
Positive Punishment
decreasing/weakening the likelihood of a behavior occurring again, by adding something undesirable
35
New cards
Negative Punishment
Decreasing/weakening the likelihood of a behavior occurring again, by taking away something undesirable,
36
New cards
Acquisition (operant Conditioning)
Initial learning stage; when the organism recognizes the behavior & consequence (cause & effect)
37
New cards
Shaping
Rewarding successive approximates of a desired behavior (reinforce a similar/smaller behavior as the organism gets closer and closer to the desired behavior.
38
New cards
Chaining
Reinforcement of individual responses occurring in a sequence to form a complex behavior. (Breaking down complex tasks into parts)
39
New cards
Extinction(Operant Conditioning)
Occurs if/when the consequence stops, behavior reverses.
40
New cards
Discriminative Stimuli
Only a particular behavior signals/produces the consequence; can organism display a behavior in one situation but not in another; believes the consequence is only available in certain circumstances.
41
New cards
Generalization
Similar behaviors produce the same consequence that you've figured out from experience & therefore repeat
42
New cards
Premack Principle
First complete a low-probability/needed behavior, then you get to do the highly desired behavior; reinforcers exist in a hierarchy - reinforcers have different reinforcement "power"
43
New cards
Disequilibrium hypothesis
Any activity can become a reinforcer if access is restricted, reinforces become more powerful when access is restricted
44
New cards
Continuous Reinforcement
Reward is given every time the behavior occurs
45
New cards
Fixed Ratio(FR)
Reward is given after a set number of responses. Ex: Punch Card/Loyalty Card, grade 5 essays then take a break.
46
New cards
Variable Ratio(VR)
Reward is given after an average/unknown/inconsistent number of response. Ex; Gambling, how many at-bats before home run.
47
New cards
Fixed Interval(FI)
Reward is given after a set amount of time. Ex; Paycheck every 2 weeks, Study for 1 hour then take break.
48
New cards
Variable Interval(VI)
Reward is given after an average/unknown/inconsistent amount of time. Ex: Pop quizzes, waiting to see a deer while hunting
49
New cards
Learned Helplessness(Seligman)
Tendency to give up any effort to control one's environment after repeated failures
50
New cards
E.C. Tolman's rat experiment
Took 3 groups of rats with a maze
Group 1; Regularly Reinforced, Every completion of maze gets food, faster
Group 2; Never rewarded, slightly gets faster
Group 3; Not rewarded till 11th day; sudden fast completion.
51
New cards
Latent Learning
Learning that is not immediately evident (usually demonstrated later on)
52
New cards
Cognitive map
mental representations of familiar locations
53
New cards
Insight(Kohler's Monkeys)
The sudden realization/understanding of a solution to a problem (a-ha!)
54
New cards
Observational (Social) Learning
Learning without direct interaction, experience does not have to be our own
55
New cards
OL; Modeling
learning new behaviors by watching others (models) & imitating their behavior (Monkey see Monkey do)
56
New cards
OL; Vicarious Learning
learning new behaviors by watching the consequences of someone else behaviors.
57
New cards
Albert Bandura's Bobo doll experiment
Exposure to violence is positively correlated with violent behavior(but remember, correlation does not imply causation)
One group watched something violent, one doesn't. The group shown violence demonstrated violence towards the doll. The group not shown violence demonstrated a peaceful/non-violent behavior.