1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Thales
Archē: Water
Everything comes from water
Possibly everything is made of water (water as fundamental constituent)
Alternative interpretation: water is only the origin, not the material everything is made of
Earth rests/floats on water
Animism: “All things are full of gods”
Magnet has a soul because it has the power of movement
Key question: relationship between soul and water
Anaximander
Archē: Apeiron = unlimited, indefinite, that which lacks limit
Unlike water/air, the apeiron is not one of the ordinary elements
Eternal, ageless, indestructible
Everything comes from and returns to the apeiron
Cosmology: hot and cold emerge from the apeiron and generate the rest through physical processes
Celestial bodies = rings of fire surrounding Earth
Cosmos may eventually return to the apeiron
Famous fragment: things must “pay penalty” for injustice according to time
Key problem: How can opposite things emerge from the same principle?
Unclear whether apeiron is material
Anaximenes
Air is what everything is made of and what everything comes from
Preserves Anaximander's idea that the principle is unlimited
Condensation + rarefaction transform air into different elements
Air is constantly changing → always in motion (kinēsis)
Soul = breath/air
Air is associated with god
No sharp distinction between philosophy, science, and religion
Heraclitus — Logos
Nature “loves to hide” → difficult for humans to understand
Sensory evidence requires correct interpretation
Humans all possess the capacity for thinking
Most people fail to think correctly
Greatest excellence = wisdom/right thinking
Wisdom means thinking according to the cosmic logos
Heraclitus — Fire
Cosmic principle = fire
Everything is ultimately made from fire
Fire transforms into different states → generates cosmic constituents
Cosmos is an eternal, living fire
Unlike earlier Ionians, Heraclitus does not give a traditional cosmogony
Cosmos has always existed and will always exist
Theory of Flux - Heraclitus
Everything is in flux
Nothing remains completely stable
Change is essential to the identity/existence of things
River example: the river remains “the same” precisely because its waters are constantly changing
Later thinker Cratylus takes flux further: if everything changes constantly, nothing has a stable identity
The notes emphasize that this extreme view does not appear to be Heraclitus’ own
Unity of Opposites
Things are a unity of opposites
Opposites are fundamental to reality
Heraclitus' view is ontological, not merely relativistic
Opposites are united within the thing itself
Possible interpretations:
Opposites are literally identical
Things actually possess contrary properties simultaneously
Opposites exist as potentialities realized through processes over time
First two interpretations violate non-contradiction
Strife/war is a fundamental natural law
“War is the father of all”
No harmony without opposites being brought together
Heraclitus — Soul
Soul is made of fire
Soul's deterioration/death involves becoming moist
Psuche = soul; seat of:
Intelligence
Emotions
Personal identity
Character → destiny: character acquired through habit determines an individual's destiny
Wise people understand the cosmic plan connecting everything through struggle
Parmenides — Proem
Poem begins with a journey
Speaker travels along a route and eventually encounters a goddess
Likely modeled on initiation rites
Goddess probably symbolizes wisdom/reason
Uses metaphors and epic poetic style
Parmenides - Two Paths of Investigation
Mortals have two possible paths:
“Is” — what exists/is
“Is not” — what does not exist
Greek grammar allows “is” and “is not” to function as complete statements
The two paths exclude a third option
Only the path of “is” can actually be followed
Parmenides — Why “What Is Not” Cannot Be Thought
What-is-not cannot be thought or spoken
Thinking/speaking requires an object that in some sense exists
Whatever we name necessarily is
Therefore, we cannot meaningfully think/speak about absolute non-being
There is no middle ground between total being and total non-being
Parmenides — Path of Opinion
Mortals mistakenly believe in plurality
If there are many separate things, they believe something both is and is not
Example: a chair is a chair but is not a table
This violates Parmenides' fundamental principle
Therefore, perceived plurality is illusory
Parmenides — Senses vs. Reason
Senses make us perceive a world of many things
Sensory perception produces the illusion of plurality
Reason must override sensory appearances
Major methodological innovation:
Start with a priori principles
Infer conclusions from those principles
No induction
Parmenides — Nature of Being
Being is ungenerated and imperishable
Otherwise something would have to come from non-being
Being is whole, unique, complete
Nothing else can exist outside it
Being exists only in the present
Past = “no longer being”
Future = “not yet being”
Being is indivisible
Being is motionless
Being is homogeneous/self-contained
Often described as a sphere
Parmenides vs. Ionian Philosophers
Ionian philosophers propose a material monism
Water, air, apeiron, etc.
Parmenides' monism is different
His monism concerns Being itself, not simply one material substance
His goddess presents a cosmology involving night and light
This cosmology is not necessarily true—it illustrates how mortals have gone astray
Empedocles
Born c. 492 BCE in Acragas/Sicily
Physician, poet, prophet, political leader, philosopher
Wrote On Nature and Purifications
Famous ancient story: died by jumping into Mount Etna
Empedocles — Pluralism
Concerned with the relationship between unity and multiplicity
Unlike Ionian monists, proposes multiple fundamental principles
Four fundamental Roots:
Fire
Air
Earth
Water
Roots possess Parmenidean qualities:
Eternal
Unchanging
Complete
Each has a single nature
Sensible objects are mixtures of the roots and can change
Empedocles - Love and Strife
Roots do not mix by themselves
Two cosmic forces control them:
Love → attraction/combination
Strife → separation/repulsion
Love and Strife are spatially extended but invisible
Empedocles — No Creation or Destruction
Nothing genuinely comes into existence from nothing
Nothing is completely destroyed
What appears to be creation/destruction is actually mixture and separation
Basic elements remain eternal
Empedocles — Cosmic Cycles
Love combines all four roots into a unified sphere
Sphere is not yet a cosmos
Strife separates the roots
Separation generates the differentiated cosmos
Eventually roots become completely separated
Love then begins combining them again
Cycle repeats eternally
Empedocles — Soul & Transmigration
Souls were originally daimones in a blessed state
Souls are expelled because of sin
They undergo transmigration as purification
Souls can enter:
Humans
Animals
Plants
Goal = eventual return to the blessed state
Empedocles — Vegetarianism
Avoiding bloodshed is necessary for purification
Because souls can inhabit animals, killing/eating animals interferes with purification
Therefore vegetarianism is connected to his theory of transmigration
Empedocles vs. Parmenides
Empedocles preserves eternal, unchanging fundamental reality
But explains the changing sensible world through mixture/separation
Four roots + Love + Strife = eternal realities
Problem: roots must move spatially to mix
This potentially exposes Empedocles to Zeno's arguments against motion
Anaxagoras
Born in Clazomenae, Asia Minor
Lived in Athens for ~20 years
Part of Pericles' intellectual circle
Ancient sources report a trial for impiety and exile
Wrote one book in Ionian prose
“Everything in Everything” - Anaxagoras
Basic constituents must be:
Complete
Self-sufficient
Eternal
Not subject to genuine creation/destruction
Sensible things are mixtures of these basic ingredients
Nothing is genuinely created or destroyed
Every body contains all ingredients
Ingredients are never found completely in isolation
Everything is always a mixture
There is no smallest thing
Everything can be divided infinitely
Even after division, it remains a mixture
Predominance Principle - Anaxagoras
Since everything is present in everything, why do things appear different?
A thing's identity depends on the predominance of particular ingredients
Example concept: something is X because X's ingredients predominate in its mixture
Anaxagoras — Nous
Nous = Mind
Unmixed
Self-ruled
Complete
Self-sufficient
Controls the rotation that separates things from the original mixture
Governs the order of the cosmos
Finest thing
Has knowledge of all things
Question left open: Is Nous incorporeal?
Principle of Sufficient Reason - Atomism
For every fact, there must be a sufficient reason why it is the case
No brute facts
If something seems unexplained, we should continue searching for its explanation
Leucippus
Very little is known about his life
Credited as creator of atomist theory
Associated with:
The Great World System
On Mind
Only one fragment survives
Democritus
Born in Abdera, c. 460 BCE
Same city as Protagoras
Contemporary of Plato
Possibly student of Leucippus
Wrote extensively on:
Natural philosophy
Ethics
Medicine
Other subjects
Atomism — Parmenidean Elements
Distinction between genuine reality and appearance
Genuine reality = atoms
Atoms are:
Unchangeable
Unaffectable
Imperceptible
Sensible world results from different atomic aggregations
Creation/destruction only occur at level of appearances
Atoms + void make motion and plurality possible
Atoms
Infinite number
Imperceptible
No secondary qualities:
No smell
No taste
No color
Only properties:
Shape
Size
Arrangement
Position
Indivisible because there is no void inside them
Homogeneous → no sufficient reason for them to split
Infinite number of shapes because there is no sufficient reason for atoms to have one particular shape rather than another
Void - Atomism
A type of non-being
Functions as spatial gaps/intervals
Atoms are separated by void
Void makes motion possible
Atoms move through space
Atomic Motion
Dissimilar atoms → repel
Similar atoms → attract
Primary cosmic swirl is attributed to chance
Atoms form bodies by coming close together without merging
“Contact” means near each other, not literally fused
Mechanistic Cosmos
Leucippus: nothing happens randomly; everything happens by reason and necessity
No purposive explanation is required
“Reason” means explanation, not purpose
Necessity = mechanical forces such as impact and repulsion
Atomist Epistemology
Objects emit continuous streams of atoms from their surfaces
These affect our sensory organs
Perception results from interaction between atoms and our senses
Senses cannot directly perceive atoms
Sensory qualities are “by convention”
In reality, only atoms and void exist properly
Democritus is not a skeptic → he is a theoretical realist
Atomist Psychology & Ethics
Soul is made of atoms
Soul permeates the entire body
Thoughts are physical experiences
Goal of life = cheerfulness/enjoyment
Avoid distress
Key to cheerfulness = moderation in pleasures
Conformity to conventional morality