Chapter 2: Choices in responding to confluct

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

Difference between conflicts and disputes

not all conflicts involve disputes, but all disputes involve conflicts and dispute is made of 3 essential items

2
New cards

Conflict is the result of

incompatible aspirations

3
New cards

Aspirations

hopes and desires that develop from our underlying interests

4
New cards

Positive functions of conflict

releases tension

promotes growth

regulates distance between people

acts as path to intimacy and personal gain

prevents stagnation

5
New cards

Problem with imposed conflict solutions

suppresses needs and aspirations of disputants

causes individual problems to intensify

6
New cards

Dispute results from aspirations combined with the following 3 criteria

perceiving incompatible aspirations

blaming opposition as injury

claiming redress for injury

7
New cards

Seeing conflict as problematic leads to the belief that

an authoritative 3rd party should resolve it S

8
New cards

Seeing conflict as symptom of unmet aspirations is more likely to lead to wanting dispute resolution to

clarify, examine, and incorporate disputant’s aspirations into the solution

seeing disputants as most knowledgeable about their own aspirations and being best equipped to state their needs and interests

9
New cards

Two most common responses to conflict

argumentative approach

cooperative problem solving

10
New cards

4 responses to conflicting aspirations

ignoring

yielding

contending

cooperative problem solving

11
New cards

Contending aka

argumentative approachI

12
New cards

Ignoring

disputant ignores or avoids the conflict and shows they don’t consider their aspirations worth the confrontation

13
New cards

Object of ignoring

not to participate/engage

14
New cards

Yielding

disputant accepts the other party’s aspirations as more important than their owon

15
New cards

Object of yielding

to participate and then give up

16
New cards

Contending

each disputant contests, using combative techniques, the other’s claims

each seeks to fulfill their respective aspirations

17
New cards

Object of contending

to win

18
New cards

Cooperative problem solving

each disputant focuses on BOTH their own aspirations and that of the other with the aim of finding a mutually beneficial solution

19
New cards

Object of cooperative problem solving

for both parties to win

20
New cards

In argumentative approach, conflict is seen as

a problem that needs ending

21
New cards

Disputants in argumentative approach view conflict as - thinking which assumes there is only -

either/or

1 solution to a conflict

22
New cards

Steps of argumentative approach

each develops a thesis

each makes a case for their thesis

each adopts a stance for their thesis

competitive clash of ideas leading to synthesis of best of both positions

23
New cards

What rules are used when arguing with winning as the goal

rules of natural justice

24
New cards

Rules of Natural Justice (3 elements)

parties present their case

parties challenge/attack the other’s case

parties defend their case

25
New cards

What ACTUALLY happens in the argument process

each side becomes more rigid and adversarial and starts to work on either/or basis

26
New cards

Costs of argument approach

loss of trust

end of active listening

damage to relationship

leaves out the yielders

energy goes into justification instead of exploration of solutions

polarization of viewpoints

27
New cards

Cooperative problem solving sees conflict as

part of relationships and cultures

opportunity for change and growth

28
New cards

Cooperative problem solving moves from either/or to -

both/and

29
New cards

Both/and thinking assumes

there are multiples solutions

30
New cards

Energies of disputants in cooperative problem solving go into

increasing awareness of the other side and finding mutually beneficial solutions

31
New cards

Features of cooperative problem solving

trust

awareness

brainstorming

32
New cards

5 principles of cooperative negotiation were developed by

Fisher, Ury, and Patton and Harvard Faculty of Law

33
New cards

5 principles of cooperative negotiation

separate people from the problem

focus on interests, not positions

invent options foro mutual gain

use objective criteria

BATNA

34
New cards

BATNA

best alternative to the negotiated agreement

35
New cards

Benefits of cooperative approach (leads to both/and thinking which in turn…)

each party has their own frame of reference

each frame of reference is validated, clarified, explored

mutually beneficial solution is possible with creative solution