1/105
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Professionalism
Set of values, behaviours and relationships that underpins the trust the public has in a doctor
GMC purpose
Provide current code of conduct for medical professionals
Ensures that all doctors are fit for practice
Hippocratic oath
Outlines the main moral and ethical obligations of doctors doctors and requires them to uphold certain ethical standards.
sworn agreement requires doctors to uphold certain ethical standards (not a law)
GMC ethical guidance
set out the professional values, knowledge, skills and behaviours expected of all doctors
Consequentialism
Moral worth of an act should be judged by net benefits of its consequences (results based ethics)
Utilitarianism
Greatest balance of good over evil for as many people as possible
Deontology
Requires that we abide by certain absolute guiding rules regardless of consequences = duty based
Duties are absolute (some rules shouldn't be broken EVER eg stealing or killing even it causes harm etc)
Autonomy > beneficence
Judges morality based on rule
Rights based deontology
Obligation to respect rights (autonomy beneficence, non-maleficence, truth and fairness, justice and integrity)
Rule based deontology
Compares moral to a set of rules to determine if it is right or wrong (focus on reasoning not feelings)
Virtue ethics
Concentrates on a person's character
Doing the right thing is only right if it is what a virtuous person would do
A virtuous person is one who exercises the virtues
Virtue = traits human needs to flourish
private healthcare
made up of hospitals and clinics
which are run independently from the NHS normally by a commercial company sometimes charities
Duty of care
The obligation of one party to take care and prevent harm to another party
Usually owed to patients by healthcare staff
legal requirement ⇒ Negligence/breach of civil law if not met
autonomy
Capacity to think, decide and act on the basis of thought and make decisions freely and independently
Free from controlling influence or coercion
Paternalism
Doctor decides what is right and makes decisions with minimal consent / overrides patients wishes
Beneficence
'Doing good' → providing benefit to patient ⇒ act in patient's best interests
Balancing benefits of treatment against risk and cost
Respect autonomy as to what is perceived to be a benefit (mastectomy good for one woman but not another)
Non-maleficence
'Do no Harm' -minimising harm→ never absolute
Requires balance with beneficence as all treatment involves some form of harm
Harm should never outweigh benefits of a treatment
Justice
The fair treatment or allocation of people and resources
Distributive justice
fair allocation of resources (in relation to cost)
legal justice
respect for morally acceptable laws
rights based justice
respect of patients human rights (don't discriminate)
Prima facies
Principle that says that duties are absolute until one conflicts with another
when conflict between duties arises, you have to pick between them
4 ethical principles - prima facie
Right
A moral or legal entitlement to have or do something
rights protect the right-holder by making obligations towards them
Everyone equally entitled to human rights without discrimination
Human rights
rights inherent to all human beings
regardless of nationality, place of residence, sex etc
Universal human rights
often expressed and guaranteed by law
international human rights law lays down obligation of governments to act in certain ways or refrain from certain acts in order to promote and protect human rights
Interests
The feeling of wanting to know
Things that make our lives go well
Interests can conflict between individuals
Absolute right
can never be limited / unqualified can legally be enforced
Limited rights
rights with exceptions- can lawfully be restricted e.g. right to liberty (prison)
Qualified right
government can interfere if it is lawful and necessary
eg national security
legal rights
Rights justified by law
Civil laws that enforce what can and cant be done
Needs to be certain and absolute
Changed deliberately by parliament
moral rights
Rights justified by moral principles
IMPLIES duty on others to do or not do something
CANNOT be deliberately changed → evolves slowly so more flexible and variable
positive rights
an obligation to provide something to the right holder
requires someone to do something for you
Negative rights
A duty to do nothing and not interfere → nothing has to be provided for this right to be exercised
Requires others to refrain from doing anything to prevent you for enjoying this right eg freedom of speech
statute law
Laws passed by parliament
Statutes = laws created by acts of parliament ⇒ ALWAYS BINDING
Common Law and precedent
Built on case law and precedence (previous legal rulings) as opposed to statutes
Court has to follow a previous decision if there was a previous ruling from a higher court (parliament can still overrule)
Public law
made up of both statute and common law
Case law
A judge has made a legal decision on a case
provides legal precedence in other cases = the law set by cases
precedence = what has been decided in previous law (not necessarily binding)
Civil law
2 independent parties
deals with tort / contract law (private law)
Aims to fairly compensate
Criminal law
One independent party against the state
Broken the law of the state
Used to decide if and what punishment should be delivered and carried out
Tort law
a civil wrong that inflicts harm or loss upon a person
covers battery (unlawful physical contact)
and negligence in medical practice = failure to provide adequate medial treatment
Distributive justice
How medical goods are split up fairly
Fair allocation of resources
Lay def of dignity
The quality of being worthy of esteem or respect Who decides this? ⇒ subjective
Medical Definition of dignity
Ability to feel important and valuable, and being able to communicate this in relation to others, and to be treated as such in threatening contexts.
implied by the principle of medical ethics → Dignity =
The need to obtain voluntary, informed consent
The requirement to protect confidentiality
The need to avoid discrimination and abusive practices
Respect to the individual
Respect for autonomy
Virtue ethics
A framework that focuses on the character of the moral agent rather than the rightness of an action
Cardinal Virtues
Courage
Prudence
Temperance
Justice
Theological virtues
Faith
Hope
Charity
Domino transplant
Patient needs new lungs but has healthy heart
Patient gets new lungs AND heart from a (same) cadaver same cadaver = decreased chance of rejection
Patient A's Heart available for transplant to another person
Consent required for both clinical procedures and to the donation of other organs removed in the course of the treatment
Live donation
Altruistic donation from healthy donors
Paired and pooled donation
Donor and recipient are incompatible
They are are paired up with one or more other couples
Each exchange organs
Altruistic non directed donation
Donation of blood, gametes or bone marrow by strangers = commonplace
sometimes donation is offered to a stranger
Permissable under the 2004 act
needs to be reviewed by 3 panel members of the HTA
Property
Describes a thing
the relationship between a person and a thing
Rules of rights in relation to property
If a person owns something, they have property rights to it :
The right to use the property
The right to sell / rent / transfer the property
The right to exclude others from using it
POSITIVE RIGHT
Privacy
Article 8 of the human rights act 1998
Based on principle of human dignity
A state by which one is not observed or disturbed by other people
rights to privacy and property - terms of body ownership
Both rights to privacy and property would prohibit removal of a persons bodily material
without their consent
Paris method
Dissecting in front of people
was the main method of teaching anatomy
Murder act 1752
Any sentenced murder should be executed 2 days after sentencing
any criminal that was hanged could have their body dissected (seen as double punishment) ⇒ allowed medical schools to legally dissect
Led to an increase in crimes that were punishable by hanging
Done to keep up with growing demands for corpses for dissection
Capacity
The ability to use and understand information to make a decision and communicate any decision made
All adults are presumed to have sufficient capacity to decide on their own medical treatment unless theres significant evidence to suggest otherwise
Lack capacity
If an individuals mind is impaired or disturbed in some way
Affects ability for that individual to make a decision
TIME SPECIFIC, CIRCUMSTANCES CAN CHANGE SO CAPACITY NEEDS TO BE REASSESSED
Advanced desicion
A decision to refuse particular medical treatments for a time in the future when you may be unable to make such a decision (CPR)
aka living will
need to be 18 years old or above
-have capacity at time
-only refuse not demand treatments
-written down
-signed by individual + witness
Lasting power of attourney
Legal recognition of proxies in mental capacity act 2005 (previously only allowed to handle legal and financial affairs)
Third parties able to make decisions on behalf of an individual if they lack capacity
Once lack of capacity is registered and individual is registered as LPA, they are charged with representing a patients best interests
Mental Capacity Act 2005
Applies to those who are 18 and over and have a disorder of the mind / brain
Aimed to protect and restore power to these individuals
Informed Consent
A doctor is under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended trearment and any reasonable alternatives and variant treatments
Doctor must explain all risks and benefits even if it alters the patients choice to one that is not in their best interest (autonomy)
Battery
Touching without consent, regardless of harm
Direct physical contact is required to be charged with battery
There does not need to be any harm intended or occurring as a result
Civil offence (PERSON VS PERSON)
Assault
Does not require physical contact
Requires threat of harm
Criminal offence (STATE VS PERSON)
Tort of Negligence
failure to provide adequate medical treatment
A breach of duty of care that results in SERIOUS harm
Duty of Care
obligation to prevent harm to another
Bolam Test
Establishes whether a medical professional has breached their duty of care
Doctor must be able to show their opinion / action had a logical basis prevent being found NOT guilty if acted in accordance to proper practice
IF DOCTOR REACHES STANDARD OF A RESPONSIBLE BODY OF MEDICAL OPINION = NOT NEGLIGENT
Gillick competence
patient although under 16 can understand medical information sufficiently
The doctor cant persuade the patient to inform/gain permission for the doctor to inform the young patients guardian
In cases where young patient is seeking contraception, patient is very likely to have sex with or without contraception prescription safer to give
Young patients mental / physical health are likely to suffer if the treatment is not given
It is in the patients best interest for the the doctor to treat without parental consent
Fraser Guidlines
application of gillick competence is specific cases where girl under 16 is requesting contraception
●They understand all aspects of the advice and its implications
●You cannot persuade the young person to tell their parents or allow you to tell them
●In relation to STI's and sex, the young person would otherwise have unprotected sex
●The young persons mental or physical health is likely to suffer if they don't receive treatment
●It is in the best interests of the young person to receive the advice and treatment without parental knowledge or consent
Informed refusal
Healthcare team should ensure that the patient has based their decision to refuse of accurate information and any misunderstandings have been corrected
All options should have been discussed and weighed up by patient though they are not obliged to justify their refusal
Confidentiality (general def)
The state of keeping, or being kept a secret
Confidentiality (medical def)
A legal obligation
derived from case law
Prohibits a doctor/medical practitioner from revealing anything said to them by their patients during consultation or treatment
Profession
An occupation whose core element is work based upon the mastery of a complex body of knowledge and skills - LEARN
A vocation in which the knowledge of science or learning or the practice of an art is used in the service of others
Proffesionalisation
the action or process of giving an occupation, activity or group professional qualities
typically by increasing training or raising required qualifications
Proffesional Judgement
Professional can make a decision or judgements
based on expertise and skill
As a result of training
Specialisation
Increasing expertise within one field
with more specific training,
more autonomy and
higher prestige
Diversification
Expanding the professional boundaries within a particular discipline,
so when new techniques / tasks come along that no one is specifically trained for,
you can absorb that into your own discipline
expansion of the role of a particular discipline, that was previously owned by a particular disciplinary group. Identifying new markets, new technologies and new philosophies
Vertical Substitution
Delegation of tasks across levels of expertise / people / disciplinary boundaries
eg. advanced nurse practitioners can now prescribe
Horizontal Substitution
Delegation of tasks across SIMILAR levels of training and expertise
but from different disciplinary backgrounds
eg role overlap between occupational therapists and physiotherapists
Proletarinisation
predicts the decline of medical power
as a result of deskilling and the salaried employment of medical practitioners (other disciplines specialise and become more skilled = less of a difference between doctor and other HCP)
De-professionalisation
a loss of professional occupations of their unique qualities
particularly their monopoly over knowledge, public belief in their service ethos and expectations of work autonomy and authority over clients
Post-professionalisation
loss of exclusivity over knowledge that is experienced by existing professions
arises due to rise in tech and increased access to information and the differences in the way that knowledge is applied through increasing specialisation
Complementary Medicine
when a non mainstream practice is used together with conventional medicine
Alternative Medicine
when a non mainstream practice is used instead of conventional medicine
Medical dominance (3 parts)
refers to the medical professions control over the content, terms and conditions of its own work (autonomy), control over other health occupations and the health division of labour (authority), control over clients and control over the broader context of healthcare (sovereignty)
4 Domains of GMC
Knowledge, skills and development
Patients, partnership and communication
Colleagues, culture and safety
Trust and professionalism
Data Protection Act 1998 (Medical Records)
Patient has right to access own medical records. And find out classes of people whom it will be disclosed to. Also entitled to a copy in an understandable form
Access to medical reports act 1990 (Medical Records)
Relates specifically to medical reports for insurance or employment purposes that are written by the patient's own doctor and give rights of access to them; the GMC advises doctors to offer to show patients any reports they write about them.
Human Rights Act 1998 (Medical Records)
access to medical records was part of the right to respect for private and family life under article 8 of the ECHR - European Commission on Human Rights.
Access to Health Records 1990 (Medical Records)
pertains to the information of the deceased; the medical records are permissible to the patient's representative and to any person who may have a claim arising out of the patient's death.
DROIT Framework for protecting Patient Rights
Dignity = human right that recognises the worth of every person.
Respect is an affirmative acknowledgement of individual circumstances.
Obligation to act in the best interests of the patient is fundamental to medical professionalism.
Information is the foundation of healthcare decisions for patients and doctors.
Trust is the competence and ability of the doctor is a prerequisite for confidence.
Examine how anatomical knowledge was acquired historically
14th century Europe dissection of publicly executed felons was introduced
Lasted until 19th century- This was eventually stopped due to people dying alone and being dissected without giving consent.
'Body snatching'- early 19th century, medical schools were filled with stolen cadavers, due to a shortage of legally obtained cadavers.
Lay knowledge at this time was that they would be like frankinstein- anatomists could have prevented this lay belief, and it would have prevented objections towards dissection.
Explore if and how the treatment of people and bodies alter in life and death
Human tissue act 2004
-Regulation of removal, storage and use of human tissue
-'DNA theft' was established, meaning you cannot take tissue for DNA analysis without the consent of the person you took it from.
-Selling and trafficking organs was made illegal
-
-Under this act, it became legal to take the first steps to preserve the organs of the deceased until we know the wishes of the individual/ consent of someone in a qualifying relationship.
-
Live donations- domino, paired or pooled. Need to have counselling before undergoing the donation
Consider the moral, legal, historical and ethical perspectives on body ownership in life and death (1)
Are our bodies property?
For :
- It is possible to place value on property beyond the material e.g. wedding rings, or things with sentimental value.
- So we should be able to regard our bodies as property as long as it's not the only way they are valued. It may be possible to cl aim intellectual property on bodily material.
- If we assert owner ship over our bodiæ we have control over our body parts when removed, can seek the return of that body part if wrongfully taken and seekcompensation if profit is made of our body part/human tissue (Moore v University of California).
Against :
To say the body is property is demeaning- it is too precious to be owned. We should focus on autonomy and right to dignified treatment instead of right to own . Our reationship with our body isone of "existing" not "having" Bodies cannot be regarded as property in terms of property law because they are not transferable or divisible. Recognising property rights to a person's body couId hinder medical research and may lead to patient's "shopping around" to find the best pr ice for their body parts/human tissue.
Consider the moral, legal, historical and ethical perspectives on body ownership in life and death
Duties to the living:
-Unclaimed bodies can legally be used as cadavers, but these usually belong to the poor- exploitation?
-It goes against the religious and spiritual beliefs of some to utilise the body of the deceased
Duties to the living person who is now dead:
- Autopsy is carried out to find out the cause of death
Duties to the dead in terms of body use:
-Formal- abide by the explicit wishes of the deceased
-Substantial- respectful treatment of the dead is universal
For Consent to be valid it must be:
C- capacitous
O- ongoing
V- voluntary
I- informed
Negligence
breach of duty of care that results in SERIOUS harm
Battery
direct physical contact, not necessarily with harm
Capacity in terms of the mental capacity act:
-Understand the information
-Retain it
-Use or weigh it
-Communicate the decision in any means
When can you breach confidentiality?
-The patient consents
-Within healthcare teams
-If acting in the patients best interests
-If acting in the publics best interests
-
Sharing within the healthcare team is deemed to be implicit consent, sharing to a third party would need explicit patient consent.
Discuss the reasons why complementary and alternative medicine has increased in popularity with patients and healthcare professionals
Reasons why people are shifting to it:
-Dissatisfied with conventional medicine
-Little to no side effects with CAM
-Patients are able to convey symptoms and concerns more effectively
-
Arguments against it:
-It is not evidence based
-Lack of knowledge behind the practitioners
-Potentially harmful as patients not seeking the correct medical care