1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What was Barth's defense of Anselm's argument?
It was originally written as a theological apologetic - rational defense of faith
Doesn't depend on belief in God:
everyone has a concept of God - he is great
dictionary definition
Strengths of Malcolm's:
language game theory strengthens it
definition of God is updated and modern
structure is logical and easy to follow - conclusion follows from premises (valid)
Strengths of Descartes:
though the argument is deductive, he uses examples from real life to better shape his argument (triangles + highlands and lowlands)
clear, distinct idea of God