Henri Tajfel (1970 and 1971)

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
Get a hint
Hint

Who and when

1 / 9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

10 Terms

1

Who and when

Henri Tajfel (1970 and 1971)

New cards
2

Method

Laboratory Experiment

New cards
3

Aim

To demonstrate that placing people in groups is enough for there to be outgroup discrimination (minimal group paradigm)

New cards
4

Participants (1970)

64 boys from the same school in Bristol were split into 8 different groups.

New cards
5

Procedure (1970)

Intergroup Categorization

1. Boys were brought into a room and told the study was about visual judgment

2. A series of dots was flashed, and the boys estimated how many dots they had seen. They were told depending on this, they would be either over or under-estimators

Effects of Categorization

1. ATP The boys were no longer in groups and were told they would be giving points to unknown participants that would become money after the experiment.

2. The boys received an booklet with a matrix that shows that if x amounts of points were given to an ingroup member, then the outgroup members would receive a larger amount.

3. There were three matrixes: ingroup vs ingroup, ingroup vs outgroup, and outgroup vs. outgroup.

New cards
6

Findings (1970)

Ingroup vs. ingroup

They would give both members no points to cause no harm to either ingroup member.

Ingroup vs. outgroup

The boys favored the ingroup member.

New cards
7

Participants (1971)

48 boys from the same school in Bristol between the ages of 14-15 were placed into 3 groups.

New cards
8

Procedure (1971)

Intergroup Categorization

1. The boys were shown 12 slides with unlabeled paintings from 2 artists (6 and 6).

2. They were then assigned groups randomly (they thought it was because of what painting they chose)

Effects of Categorization

1. Boys were given a booklet with 14 different tables. The tables did not remove points from one group but would favor another (14=1 → 1=14)

2. Some of the tables would favor the outgroup more if the boys favored the ingroup, but there was an option for equal balance.

New cards
9

Findings (1971)

The boys would not pick the fair option if there was a significant difference between the two groups.

New cards
10

Conclusion

Discrimination is a result of the designation of the ingroup and the outgroup.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 27 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 91 people
... ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
... ago
4.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 3 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 21724 people
... ago
4.6(101)
note Note
studied byStudied by 35 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 42 people
... ago
5.0(2)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (21)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (50)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (57)
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (59)
studied byStudied by 36 people
... ago
5.0(4)
flashcards Flashcard (44)
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (35)
studied byStudied by 117 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (36)
studied byStudied by 28 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (989)
studied byStudied by 383 people
... ago
4.0(3)
robot