Hnrs: SDE - Exam #1

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/53

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:54 PM on 8/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

54 Terms

1
New cards

positive analysis

an objective statement that is testable

2
New cards

normative analysis

a subjective statement that is not testable

3
New cards

economics

the study of how people make choices given the existence of scarsity

4
New cards

opportunity cost

the highest valued forgone alternative; the value of the second most perfered option

5
New cards

economic guidepost #1

opportunity cost

6
New cards

economic guidepost #2

significance of incentives - monetary & non-monetary

7
New cards

economic guidepost #3

direct & indirect effects

8
New cards

economic guidepost #4

self interest of individuals; maximize utility/happiness

9
New cards

economic guidepost #5

rationality of individuals; make choices if benefit outweighs the cost

10
New cards

economic guidepost #6

value is subjective

11
New cards

economic guidepost #7

empirical evidence is highly significant

12
New cards

economic guidepost #8

consider all relevant costs & benefits

13
New cards

cost-benefit equation

marginal benefit (MB) > marginal cost (MC)

14
New cards

fallacy definition

a defect or flaw in your argument; an invalid conclusion drawn from an observation

15
New cards

fallacies of definitions (3)

1) weak analogy / false equivalence

2) subjective wording / vaugeness

3) open-ended fallacies

16
New cards

define weak analogy fallacy

an analogy that is unclear, unhelpful, or equates two things that are not equal

17
New cards

define the subjective wording fallacy

using words with vauge definitions and not defining what they mean in context

18
New cards

define open ended fallacy

arguing for more or less of something without defining how much more or less

19
New cards

fallacies about making stuff up (3)

1) false premise / begging the question

2) speculation / fallacy of unknowable fact

3) nonsequitor / does not follow

20
New cards

define the false premise fallacy

making a conclusion by relying on a statement or premise

21
New cards

define the speculation fallacy

making an argument about what would have happened under different or unknowable circumstances; there is no way to verify the claim

22
New cards

define the nonsequitor fallacy

the conclusion has nothing to do with the statement that comes before it; “A” is true, “B” is true, therefore “X”

23
New cards

illogical restriction fallacies (1)

1) either-or fallacy / false dilemma

24
New cards

define the false dilemma or either-or fallacy

assuming there are a limited number of possible outcomes when clearly there are more

25
New cards

causal fallacies (3)

1) false cause fallacy

2) single cause fallacy

3) slippery slope fallacy

26
New cards

define false cause fallacy

assuming that because A and B are correlated, A must have caused B

27
New cards

define single cause fallacy

assuming one single cause for an event

28
New cards

define slippery slope fallacy

assuming if something does or doesn’t happen, it will trigger a domino effect

29
New cards

graphs of false cause (2)

1) positive correlation

2) negative correlation

30
New cards

undermining proof fallacies (2)

1) argument from ignorance

2) lack of proof

31
New cards

fallacies of misrepresentation (2)

1) strawman argument

2) reductive fallacy

32
New cards

define the strawman argument

putting words in your opponents mouth, ignoring opponents actual stance and distorts it.

33
New cards

define the reductive fallacy

reducing something, often uses “nothing but”

34
New cards

“no room for argument” fallacies (3)

1) perfectionist fallacy

2) willed ignorance

3) ad hominem / appeal to hypocrisy / you did it too

35
New cards

perfectionist fallacy

arguing if something won’t be perfect it is not worth doing at all

36
New cards

willed ignorance definition

refusing to engage in critical thinking or logical thought, instead maintaining your beliefs are final and absolute

37
New cards

define the ad hominem / appeal to hypocrisy / you did it too fallacy

attacking your opponents character, personal, heritage, or choices instead of their actual argument

38
New cards

appeals (4)

1) appeal to popularity - bandwagon

2) appeal to authority

3) appeal to wealth

4) appeal to emotion

39
New cards

define appeal to popularity / bandwagon

using the popularity of something as evidence that it must be correct or true

40
New cards

define appeal to authority

using an authority figures opinion (especially if improper or irrelevant) as proof

41
New cards

define appeal to wealth

using someone’s wealth, money, or possessions as evidence they know about issues

42
New cards

define emotional appeal

attempting to persuade by targeting feelings (fear, pity, anger, etc.) rather than introducing valid evidence

43
New cards

define the genetic fallacy

discrediting the source or origin of an argument rather than the argument itself

44
New cards

questionable evidence & distraction fallacies (4)

1) anectdotal evidence

2) biased sample

3) cherry picking evidence

4) red herring

45
New cards

define anecdotyl evidence

offering isolated examples or personal experiences as evidence

46
New cards

define biased sample

conclusions drawn from a biased sample of results

47
New cards

define cherry picking

only using evidence that confirms your bias and argument, and ignoring evidence that counters it

48
New cards

define red herring

an attempt to redirect your opponents attention away from the main topic

49
New cards

define hasty generalization

extrapolating future outcomes based on too few data points, broad contributions from inadequate samples

50
New cards

steryotyping falls under what fallacy

hasty generalization

51
New cards

economic fallacies (3)

1) the zero-sum fallacy

2) the broken window fallacy

3) the chess piece fallacy

52
New cards

define the zero-sum fallacy

the mistaken assumption that voluntary trade is a zero-sum game and only one party can gain at the expense of the other

53
New cards

define the broken window fallacy

focusing on what is easy to see and ignoring what is not easy to see

54
New cards

define the chess piece fallacy

the assumption that you can easily arrange choices for others or society like pieces on a chess board