Critiquing and Reliability

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Module 4: Claims and Validities

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Critique

as a consumer, we assess whether we can trust someones claims (deciding whether we trust is called critiquing) 

critiquing research involves understanding how constructs are measured

2
New cards

Operational definitions

defining the variable in terms of precisely how it is to be measures

  • turn an abstract concept into something measureable

3
New cards

Ways to Measure- Self Report

limitations: an individual’s perception, experience, attitudes, etc.

careful what claims you make

4
New cards

Ways to Measure- Observational

watch/record actual behavior

5
New cards

Ways to Measure- Psysiological

biological data

6
New cards

Measuring Constructs

Challenges

  • contrasts are not directly measurable

    • conceptual definition

  • many ways to make the measurable

    • operational definition- measure

  • Must be good measures

7
New cards

How do we know if our operational definition is “good”?

construct validity and construct reliability

8
New cards

To Critique claims

  1. decide what type of claim it is (3 types)

  2. Examine 3 types of reliability

  3. Examine 4 types of VALIDITY

9
New cards

3 types of claims

  • Frequency claims

  • Association claims

  • Casual claims

  • Bogus claims

10
New cards

Frequency claims

descriptive only; does not explain “why”

  • ex. “77% of university students report experiencing some kind of psychological distress, either moderate or severe”

11
New cards

Association claims

correlations and relationships only; does not explain “why”

  • “there is a strong, positive correlation between high stress levels and poor sleep quality”

12
New cards

Causal claims

explain cause and effect; CAN explain “why”

  • ex. “ good sleep hygiene leads to more efficient learning and higher scores”

**best but hard to achieve**

13
New cards

Bogus claims

not technically a “type” of claim but something to be aware of as a consumer

  • detecting bogus claims requires critiquing reliability and validity of the research

14
New cards

Reliability

a measure is reliable if it is consistent

  • a measure yields the same result repeatedly

    • test- retest reliability

    • internal consistency

    • interrater reliability

<p>a measure is reliable if it is consistent</p><ul><li><p>a measure yields the same result repeatedly</p><ul><li><p>test- retest reliability</p></li><li><p>internal consistency</p></li><li><p>interrater reliability</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
15
New cards

Validity

a measure is VALID if it is CONSISTENT and CORRECT

  • it is accurate

    • face validity

    • content validity

    • criterion validity

    • discriminant validity

<p>a measure is VALID if it is CONSISTENT and CORRECT</p><ul><li><p>it is accurate</p><ul><li><p>face validity </p></li><li><p>content validity</p></li><li><p>criterion validity</p></li><li><p>discriminant validity </p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p><p></p>
16
New cards

Types of Reliability

  1. test-retest reliability

  2. internal consistency

  3. interrater reliability