Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Psychophysics
the science of defining quantitative relationships between physical and psychological (and thus, subjective) events
Can control the physical stimuli, and then measure how a person responds/fails to respond
Method of constant stimuli
measures absolute threshold, test many stimuli of different intensities, to find out what the tiniest intensity that can be detected in
Threshold's in other fields are often all or none (you either hear something or don't), this is NOT how we measure in psychophysics
Does not mean that the stimuli is constantly present, and much of the stimuli is either well above or below the threshold
Method of limits
vary the magnitude/intensity of a stimulus (or difference between two) until participant notices, experimenter adjusts stimuli and samples a scale
Reality of threshold testing; threshold is the point at which you detect it 50% of the time since there are no such "perfect conditions"
Graphed as a Tan function
Method of adjustments
let participant (rather than experimenter) adjust a stimulus until it matches a target (i.e color matching)
There is an average threshold of detecting a change between participants
Data is rarely straightforward, no such thing as "perfect conditions"
Scales
measuring the strength of the sensation rather than the threshold of detection
Not all sensations have the same scale or strength
Magnitude estimation
measures scale, giving participants a sensation and have them rate its strength
Can do freeform or give a starting baseline (baseline is probably more successful)
I.e. how blue or green is this, 1 = very blue, 10 = very green
steven's power law
S = sensation
I = intensity
b = exponent tied to stimulus type
a = constant adjusted to put different scales on the same axis (i.e. adjusting for inches versus centimeters
Sensations have different scales!!!!!!
Signal detection
ability to detect a signal amongst noise, accounts for the amount of noise, the discriminability of the signal, and biases in the person's response patterns
I.e. walking to class in the cold, have a phone in your pocket; to check it, you need to take off gloves and be extra cold. with all of your snow garb on, it's hard to tell when your phone vibrates over the sound of your gear jostling
Noise
the static in your nervous system (internal) that interferes with your ability to detect a signal, or the stimuli surrounding the target signal (external) that interferes with your ability to detect it
Generally drawn as a normal distribution but can be narrow or wider
Criterion
threshold of deciding whether or not you detect a signal, can shift along x-axis, moves towards origin when you are anticipating the signal but when moving further down the x-axis means you had better be sure that the signal is present (minimizes false alarms)
Can shift reflexably on bias
Hit
signal existed and you detected it
Correct rejection
no signal, was not detected
False alarm
no signal but incorrectly detected it
Miss
signal existed but was not detected
Sensitivity
results from signal detection are shifted by this
I.e. how discriminable the target is from the noise
Difference between peaks of signal and situational noise; the larger the difference the better at distinguishing
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves
Demonstrate both sensitivity and criterion in one line
Plots Hits versus False Alarms (both Yes responses)
With greater sensitivity, curve moves closer to top left corner
Criterion is represented by a point on the curve
Transduction
translation process; all sensory organs take physical stimuli and convert them to electrical/biochemical signals in our nervous system
The way this occurs is unique to each system but the core tenets are the same
Cellular/Neuronal Neuroscience
From external to internal physics/biochem
The way transduction occurs is unique to each system but the core tenets are the same
Afferent
towards the brain, sensory
Efferent
away from the brain, motor
Systems Neuroscience
Different sensory cortices process different information
McGurk effect states that just because they are different doesn't mean they never interact
EEG
direct measure of electrical activity of large populations of neurons
assesses event-related potentials
good temporal resolution
poor spatial resolution
MRI (structural)
measures shift in magnetic fields to assess atomic structure
indirect measure
good spatial resolution
poor temporal resolution
fMRI
indirect measure
tracks blood oxygen level-dependent signal (BOLD)
PET
similar resolution to fMRI based on metabolism of radiotracer in brain cells
MEG
between EEG and fMRI
measures changes in magnetic activity across large populations of neurons in the brain
good temporal and spatial resolution for the surface of the brain