1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Judicial Review
The power of courts to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions
Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Clause: Article III
Question: Did the 1789 Judiciary Act unconstitutionally expand the Supreme Court’s Jurisdiction? Could they compel ____’s commission?
Decision: The line was declared unconstitutional
Consider: Federalist 78, upheld laws before the courts could review them.
Federalism
A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units. It allows for multiple levels of government to coexist, each with its own responsibilities.
Federalism
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Clause: Article I Section 8 necessary and proper clause, Article VI supremacy clause, 10th admendment
Question: Is a national bank constitutional? Can a state tax a bank?
Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that creating a national bank was constitutional under the necessary and proper clause and that states cannot tax federal institutions.
Theme: Broad powers of national government beyond enumerated powers
Federalism
United States v Lopez (1995)
Clause: Article 1, Sec VIII, interstate commerce clause and necessary and proper clause, 10th admendment
Question: Can congress pass a law mandating gun free school zones?
Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that Congress exceeded its authority under the Commerce Clause, thereby invalidating the Gun-Free School Zones Act.
Theme: Conservative court turning power back to the states?
Bill of rights
The first ten amendments to the US Constitution, which guarantee individual liberties and protections against government overreach.
Bill of rights
Engel v Vitale (1962)
Clause: 1st admendment, establishment clause
Question: Can state mandate prayer in school
Decision: violates establishment clause
Consider: Can states fund religious schools? Can legislatures say a prayer? Can a prayer be said at graduation?
Bill of rights
Wisconsin v Yoder (1972)
Clause: 1st admendment, free exercise clause
Question: Can amish take their children out of school before the law allows?
Decision: Religious freedom outweighed state interest in educating children. Strict scrutiny test.
Bill of rights
Tinker v Des Moines (1969)
Clause: 1st amendment, freedom of speech
Question: Can schools punish students for political speech?
Decision: The first Amendment applies to schools
Future: Bethel v Fraser, Hazelwood, Morse v Frederick
Bill of rights
NY Times v US (1971)
Clause: 1st admendment, freedom of press
Question: Can the US prevent NY Times from publishing the Pentagon papers?
Decision: No, heavy burden for prior restraint
Bill of rights
Schenck v US (1919)
Clause: 1st admendment, freedom of speech
Question: Can the government prosecute people urging citizens to resist the draft?
Decision: Yes, clear and present danger test
Due Process/Selective Incorporation
Legal doctrine preventing states from infringing on the rights of citizens, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. It includes significant rulings that apply federal rights to state laws.
Due Process/Selective Incorporation
Roe v Wade (1973)
Clause: 14th amendment due process clause, “right to privacy”
Background: ____ sues Texas over abortion law that banned abortion except for when a mother’s life was in danger.
Decision: Right exists, overturns 20 state laws
Future: Planned Parenthood v Casey, cases around restrictions
Due Process/Selective Incorporation
McDonald v Chicago (2010)
Clause: 2nd admendment, 14th admendment due process clause
Question: Is Chicago’s handgun ban constitutional in light of Heller v DC
Decision: The 2nd admendment is an individual right and enforceable against states
Redistricting
The process of drawing new boundaries for electoral districts, often influenced by population changes. It aims to ensure equitable representation in legislative bodies.
Redistricting
Baker v Carr (1962)
Clause: 14th admendment equal protection, Article 1 Sec 2
Question: Is redistricting a judiciable question?
Decision: Yes (overturns Colegrove v Green and the “political thicket”)
Future: One person, one vote (Reynolds v Simms), and overturning HoR and state legislatures that are not on person, one vote
Redistricting
Shaw v Reno (1993)
Clause: 14th amendment, equal protection clause, VRA
Question: Were NC redistricting maps an unconstitutional racial gerrymander?
Decision: Yes, strict scrutiny and VRA
Equal Protection
A constitutional guarantee that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law, as stated in the 14th Amendment.
Equal Protection
Brown v Board (1954)
Clause: 14th amendment equal protection clause
Question: Are segregated schools equal protection?
Decision: No
Future: Loving v Virginia, Cooper v Aaron
Campaigning and the Court
The process through which candidates seek to gain support, often influenced by Supreme Court decisions on campaign finance and election laws.
Campaigning and the Court
Citizens United v FEC (2010)
Clause: 1st amendment, free speech
Question: Are parts of the McCain Feingold act that limit outside group spending constitutional?
Decision: No, money is a form of speech
Consider: Buckley v Valeo, McCutcheson v REC (aggregate limits)