1/46
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Three components of the federal judiciary
SCOTUS-13 appellate courts- 94 district courts
Judges three main judicial considerations
Legal norms and principles, ideological convictions, concerns about their institutional legitimacy
Three steps to rendering decisions
Use basic legal expertise, 2. Determine relevant portions of the constitution for case 3. Decide whether there is a conflict between 1 and 2
Stare decisis
Judicial principle “to stand by things already decided,” requirement to carefully weigh decisions made by predecessors in similar cases
Attitudinal vs legal model
Attitudinal model-judges base their decisions off ideological convictions, vs legal model-legal considerations
Why does the attitudinal model seem logical?
Judges are not beholden to the public (lifetime appointment) so we would expect them to be free to consistently act in line with their ideology
How might the political question doctrine be used to advance a judges’ legal, political, and institutional interests?
Legal-can stick with deciding cases they believe they have a role in
Political-revert to the executive branch decision by not deciding the case
Institutional-decision to not hear a case can protect the institution’s legitimacy
Why is the cult of the robe a problem for the judiciary?
Courts overturn past cases, are their decisions really inviolable?
ACA ruling
SCOTUS 2012 ruled that the ACA is constitutional-individual mandate and required state Medicaid expansion were at stake
Why was the ACA ruling politically significant?
Just months before the election, landmark piece of legislation, healthcare is controversial, split 5/4
Marbury v. Madison-executive agencies
Set standard that it’s up to Congress to review executive agencies
Zone of Twilight
3 pronged test-when Congress has explicitly prohibited an act president’s powers are weakest, when expressly granted pres authority is greatest, when presidents act without Congressional authorization they are in the zone of twilight, subject to judicial review, this can expand presidential power
Chevron USA v. NRDC
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) challenged the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "bubble policy," which defined "stationary source" to include all pollution-emitting devices within an industrial plant. The EPA's rule allowed a plant to modify one piece of equipment without a new permit as long as total plant emissions did not increase. NRDC argued that each source should require a new permit, SCOTUS sided with EPA. Established chevron defense (not in effect now).
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)
Courts are now required to independently interpret statutory provisions and cannot simply defer to an agency’s interpretation
US v. Nixon reasoning
Court argued that article III gives them the authority to determine what law is and isn’t. Reinforced declaration that court can overrule actions by other branches that violate the constitution, sought to reduce scope of executive privilege
What does an executive order need to have to be considered legal?
Take place within the context of a law, cannot clearly violate a law’s provisions, comply with a president’s “take-care” clause
Administrative Procedures Act of 1946
Authorizes federal courts to review administrative action for compliance with APA and set aside agency action deemed unlawful:
Arbitrary, capricious, abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.
Contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity.
Excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations
Ignores procedure required by law
What level are APA cases usually decided at?
District court level
Nondelegation doctrine
Congress cannot relinquish its core legislative powers to executive agencies
Panama Refining Co. v Ryan (1935)
The President can’t prohibit intrastate trade
Presidential immunity
Presidents are protected from civil suits resulting from official actions taken while president, but not criminal cases or civil cases from before they took office (Trump v. US)
Trump v. Vance
No presidential immunity from state criminal subpoenas, president isn’t above the law more generally
How many New Deal acts were struck down from 1935-1936?
8
What percent of judges are registered with the same party as the president who appointed them at the time of appointment?
90 percent
What is the most important factor in determining a judge’s decision?
Ideology-80% of civil rights cases
2000 Election
Florida was too close to call, FL secretary of state tried to declare Bush as winner, FL SC blocked this, Bush sued, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Bush, that the FL interpretation should be left as is, some argue this started SCOTUS being involved in politics
The Hollow Hope-Gerald Rosenberg
Judiciary is weak because it isn’t “self-executing,” relies on other branches
What established the political question doctrine?
Marbury v Madison
Political question doctrine cases are usually ___ for the president
Good
Goldwater v. Carter
Goldwater sued when Carter tried to break off a treaty with China, court ruled it was a political question affecting allocation of power between the president and Congress
Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer
1952-US fighting Korean War, Truman issued EO seizing steel mills, SCOTUS found in favor of mill owners, established Zone of Twilight (Congress debated adding provision allowing president to intervene in labor disputes when debating Taft Hartley act but didn’t, this was important to justices)
Nixon two arguments in favor of not releasing the tapes
Executive privilege, national security
Three instances where nondelegation doctrine was used
Panama Refining co v. Ryan, A. L. A. Schleuter Poultry Corp. v. US, Carter v. Carter Coal Company
Nixon v. Fitzgerald
Fitzgerald testified to Congress on waste in the Air Force (was an AF employee), Fitzgerald was fired by Nixon, Nixon was given immunity
Clinton v. Jones
Clinton wanted to delay a civil suit from alleged sexual harassment, SCOTUS ruled he couldn’t because it resulted from actions he took before office
Trump v. Vance
ruled that Trump couldn’t not produce his tax returns when subpoenaed because no citizen is allowed to withhold evidence for a criminal trial
Ex Parte Milligan
Milligan was sentenced to death for conspiracy to commit insurrection during Civil War via a military tribunal created by Lincoln (who suspended habeas corpus), court ruled (after the war, before Milligan’s execution date) that Lincoln didn’t have authority to create these courts and Milligan had the right to be tried in a civilian court
Office of Legal Counsel
Produces legal opinions for the executive branch which are binding on agencies (no methods to insure compliance, works directly for the president), adheres to past decisions even if they are wrong
Conflict with the OLC
OLC attorneys often look to future promotions, want to decide in favor of the president because they work for the president, but the president also needs unbiased legal advice
OLC is housed in
DOJ
Solicitor General
attorney for the federal government, manages government’s interactions with SCOTUS, serves at the pleasure of the president, determines cases to appeal, files amicus curiae briefs
National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA)
would allow firms to violate existing antitrust laws (if necessary) to fix prices and wages, this was ruled unconstitutional in three cases, also it regulated intrastate commerce which is reserved to the states
Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937
Roosevelt’s court-packing scheme
Trend in lower-court nominations
Becoming even more politicized
Important consideration for presidents appointing justices
Their views on expanding presidential power
Ending norms of consideration
Constitution states that the president “shall” appoint, doesn’t require the Senate to do anything-McConnell used this to not take action on Garland nomination, citing need for new election before nomination, Trump didn’t do the same when RBG died, SCOTUS is deeply political
Four justiciability doctrines
Ripeness, mootness, standing, political question doctrine