1/149
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Digital Art
Art that is made or presented using digital technology
Started in the early 1980s when computer engineers devised a paint program called AARON
Rhein II
Andreas Gursky
Most expensive photo sold
Postmodernism
A reaction against modernism
Born of skepticism and a suspicion of reason
Challenged the notion that there are universal certainties or truths
Gave the freedom to express themselves through their paintings and design
Balatik
Orion Constellation, resembling a “hunting trap”
Moroporo
Pleiades Constellation
Kawan ng mga ibon, resembles a rosary
AKA supot ni Hudas
Great Library of Alexandria
Pinnacle of enlightenment and pedagogy
Established by Alexander the Great
Biblion
Great Library of Alexandria
where texts were archived
Museion
Great Library of Alexandria
where learning took place
The House of Wisdom
Grand library of Baghdad
One of the leading libraries in Islamic history, “Golden Age of Islam”
Adapted the intellectual richness to serve scholars, scientists, and worldwide thinkers
Abbasid dynasty
initiated the House of Wisdom
Portrait of Edmond de Bellamy
a product of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning.
The algorithm studied past paintings, and from the lessons from scanning thousands of painting, the algorithm can create a portrait of its own from learning from past art pieces.
Pseudosciences
Do not have scientific evidence and tests
Somehow false, misleading, or unproven
Normal Science
Past scientific achievements that form the foundation for further research.
Post-normal Science
Provides immediate solutions to problem faced by society
Evolutionary Diagram of Knowledge
All knowledge grows by the method of variation and selection found in living organisms.
Evolution of human knowledge as a process that progresses by trial and error-elimination, creating new hypotheses and selectively eliminating false ones.
For knowledge to be scientific, it should be falsifiable and testable
Problem
PART
We select some problem - perhaps by stumbling over it.
Theory
PART
We try to solve it by proposing a theory as a tentative solution.
Criticism
PART
Critical discussion of our theories
Knowledge grows by the elimination of some errors
Learn to understand problems, theories, and new solution
New Problem
PART
The critical discussion of even our best theories always reveals new problems.
Paradigm Shift Theory
Science does not evolve gradually toward truth.
Science has a paradigm that remains constant before going through a paradigm shift when current theories can't explain some phenomenon, and someone proposes a new theory.
Scientific Revolution
Occurs when:
new paradigm better explains the observations and offers a model that is closer to the objective, external reality
the new paradigm is incommensurate (inproportion) with the old.
Phase 1 (Pre-Science)
PHASE
Period before a scientific consensus has been reached.
Phase 2 (Normal Science)
PHASE
A paradigm is established
Sets a conventional basis for research (a precedent).
Phase 3 (Crisis)
PHASE
Anomalies arise and there will be competing theories.
If the crisis is resolved, normal science resumes.
If not, a scientific revolution occurs.
Phase 4 (Revolution)
PHASE
New paradigm will be established that better explains the observations and offers a model that is closer to the objective, external reality.
Rational Construction Model
Empirical criterion for a series of theories is that it should produce new facts.
The idea of growth and the concept of empirical character are soldered into one
Core Theory
PART
surrounded by a protective belt of auxiliary hypotheses.
Auxiliary Hypothesis
PART
ideas derivable from a certain core theory which in turn may or may not be supported by data and evidence.
Data
PART
Can weaken or strengthen the core theory depending on its alignment
Paradox of Confirmation
A geometrical theory in physical interpretation can never be validated with mathematical certainty
Like any other theory of empirical science, it can only acquire more or less a higher degree of confirmation.
This paradox highlights the strange ways logic and evidence work in scientific reasoning, where seemingly irrelevant observations might still contribute to confirming a hypothesis.
Confirmation
Relation of support between statements or propositions
Qualitative Confirmation
When p confirms q, it means (roughly and intuitively) the truth of p provides support for the truth of q.
Comparative Confirmation
When p confirms q more strongly than p confirms r, it means (roughly and intuitively) that the truth of p provides better support for the truth of q than it does for the truth of r.
Nicod Condition
For any object a and any properties F and G, the proposition that a has both F and G confirms the proposition that every F has G.
Equivalence Condition
For any propositions A, B, and C, if C confirms A and A is (classically) logically equivalent to B, then C confirms B.
Instrumentalism
Consciousness and thinking are functions of a complex organism in transaction with its environment
Consciousness is an instrumentality not a thing-in-itself.
Science is an instrument designed to control the environment and satisfy our practical ends.
The purpose of science is to predict useful phenomena, regardless of whether it accurately describes an underlying reality. The truth or accuracy of a system is seen as irrelevant, and what matters is its practical application or use.
Epistemological Anarchism
Argued that there are no universally valid methodological rules for scientific inquiry.
Critiqued the idea that there is a method to doing science. The growth of knowledge may not necessarily be rooted in the scientific enterprise.
There are no useful and exception-free methodological rules governing the progress of science or the growth of knowledge.
Feyerabend’s philosophy suggests that progress in knowledge happens through diversity, flexibility, and even chaos.
Science
Organized body of knowledge concerning the physical world, both animate and inanimate
Attitudes and methods through which this body of knowledge formed
Method of investigating nature—a way of knowing about nature that discovers reliable knowledge about it
Technology
Practical application of science
Focused on being able to control or manipulate nature.
Can we know the answer?
The main trick to science is to really think of something.
We examine the world as critically as if many alternative worlds might exists, as if other things may be here which are not.
If you spend any time spending hypotheses, checking to see wheteher they make sense, whether they conform to what else we know— you will find yourself doing Science
Can we know the answer?
Core concepts
Science is a way of thinking.
Openness and courage to question.
Hypothesis formation and curiosity.
To Look, To See, To Know
In order to see, one must first know
Seeing is a socially conditioned Act
Scientific observation is not purely objective
To Look, To See, To Know
Core concepts
Perception is shaped by prior knowledge and social context.
We do not see the world “objectively”
We see through the lens of a collective body and thought styles
Forms
Created upon sensory perception, which are to a large extent independent to their constituent elements, regardless of the sense which supplies them.
We use surrounding information to interpret ambiguous images or letters.
Collective Body
Society and culture determine what forms we recognize
Esoteric
Common people
Exoteric
professionals
Scientific facts
constructed through a thought-style shared by a community of experts
Perception
guided by instruments, methods, concepts, collective agreement among “experts”, etc.
Facts
Social constructs
Only what is true to culture is true to nature
Positivist Approach
Facts are self-evident, that they are simply there.
Physical phenomena that manifest themselves visibly are held to be factual
Constructionist Approach
Facts are socially created.
Facts are facts once people agree that these things constitute a fact.
On Scientific Method
Scientific method is not just lab work—it is a disciplined, logical process of knowing.
Inductive Reasoning
From specific observations to general conclusions
Deductive Reasoning
From general observations to specific conclusions
Statement of the Probloem
Only state what you actually know
Formulate Hypothesis
Propose multiple plausible explanations
Experimentation
Test hypothesis in question
Interpret Results
What should happen if the hypothesis is correct?
Draw Conclusions
State no more than the experiment has proved
Epistemic Development and the Perils of Pluto
How does our understanding of knowledge itself evolve?
Epistemic Development and the Perils of Pluto
Knowledge is not static – it shifts from objectivist views (facts are facts) to subjectivist (everything is opinion), and ideally to a rationalist stance that balances subjectivity and objectivity through justification.
Epistemic Cognition
Knowledge about knowledge
How we think about truth, belief, and justification
The process of thinking about one’s forms of knowledge and ways of knowing
Epistemic Development
Progress in knowledge about knowledge
How we understand and evaluate knowledge
Objectivist Epistemology
An objective domain of truth
Take facts and logical proofs as a paradigm case of knowledge
Subjectivist Epistemology
A subjective domain of taste
View knowledge as opinion, and opinion as a matter of taste
Rationalist Epistemology
A rational domain of reasonable interpretation
Construe knowledge, in a world of interpretation and inference, as justified belief.
EC
Begin to separate:
Facts
Preferences
Interpretations
MC
They can:
Evaluate logical and moral truths.
Distinguish subjective tastes (like food or clothing).
Begin to understand interpretation as distinct from fact or opinion (e.g., ambiguous images).
AA
AGE RANGE
Development becomes less predictable.
People construct broader epistemological theories
Modern Science
Spread through military conquest, colonization, imperial influence, commercial and political relations, and missionary activity.
Originating from Western European nations during the Scientific Revolution
Silk Roads
Network for exchange of goods, scientific knowledge, technology, and culture across East Asia and the Mediterranean. (130 BCE, Han Dynasty to 1450s CE)
Lucrative trade in Chinese Silk
Caravanserai
Small structures that provide travelers with a safe place to rest and house a marketplace where merchants could sell and trade their goods.
The Spread of Western Science
Three-stage model that describes the complex and gradual process the non-European nations interacted with, adopted, and developed their sciences from the Western Europe nations during the 16th to 17th centuries
Phase 1: Science as Discovery
The “nonscientific” nation provides a source of scientific knowledge for the European colonizers.
Western Europeans surveys the land and collected information about the environment, and brought it back to Europe for analysis and publication.
Phase 2: Science as Institution
The scientific activity in the new land is based on the established scientific knowledge and traditions of Europe.
Colonies begin to produce scientific knowledge, heavily dependent on Western Sciences.
Asiatic Society of Calcutta
Kolkata, India (1784)
Sir William Jones (British Empire).
Established to promote Oriental studies.
British colonial scholars studied India’s history, culture, and religion.
Geological Survey of India, Botanical Survey, and Zoological Survey.
Asiatic Researches journal
One of the first academic journals in Asia
Ecole francaise d'Extreme-Orient
Hanoi, Vietnam (1900)
French government.
Philological and Archaeological study of Southeast Asia's ancient cultures.
Restoration of Angkor Wat and other temples.
Published studies of Indochinese civilizations.
Royal Batavian Society of Arts and Sciences
Batavia, Dutch East Indies (1778)
Dutch Empire
Dutch East Indies history, archaeology, culture, and natural sciences.
Link between Netherlands and the East Indies.
Founded the National Museum of Indonesia.
Tijdschrift Voor Indische Taal Land En Volkenkunde (1933).
Phase 3: Science as Dependency
The “nonscientfic” nation struggles to achieve an independent scientific tradition or culture
Colonial scientists are to be replaced by the native scientists who work and train primarily within their own countries, build local institutions, and contribute to global science as equals.
Thomas Veiblen and Karl Marx
Presented ideas related to Technological Determinism
Caesar Augustus
One of ancient Rome’s most successful leaders
First emperor of Rome.
Roger Bacon
credited with the process of making gunpowder, proposed flying machines, motorized ships and carriages, and invented the magnifying glass.
Leonardo da Vinci
Incorporated scientific principles such as anatomy
Recreated the human body with extraordinary precision
Mona Lisa
The Vitruvian Man
Filippo Brunelleschi
Studied mathematics to accurately engineer and design immense buildings with expansive domes
Galileo Galilei
Presented a new view of astronomy and mathematics
Observed the different phases of the moon
Nicolaus Copernicus
proponent of Heliocentric Theory
Rene Descarte
Deductive reasoning through his works on “Discourse on Methods”
Joseph Schumpeter
proposed creative destruction and life and death of industries
George Basalla
proposed “The Spread of Western Science”
Joseph Banks
Pacific Voyage (1768-1771) by Cpt. James Cook
Botanical surveys in Australia (Botany Bay) and New Zealand.
Collected 30,000 plant species.
Robert Brown
Australian voyage (1801-1805) by Cpt. Matthew Flinders.
Collected ~3,900 Australian plant species.
Published Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van-Diemen (1810).
Description of the Australian plant species he observed.
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Antarctic Expedition (1839–1843) by Cpt. James Clark Ross.
Botanical expedition in India (1847-1851).
Published Flora Indica (1855).
Alfred Russel Wallace
Explored the Malay Archipelago (1854-1862)
Collected over 125,000 specimens.
Theory of Natural Selection.
Wallace Line.
Marks species with Asian origins
Francis Bacon
Proposed the need for rigorous data collection to prove or disprove a proposition
Carl Sagan
Can we know the answer?
Ludwig Fleck
To look, to see, to know
Robert Pirsig
On Scientific Method
David Moshman
Epistemic Development and the Perils of Pluto