1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What is it
The ship sank of the Lycian coast in late 14thC
Wreck has yielded large amounts of tin/copper/ivory ingots, ivory carvings, golden jewellery, metal objects and more
Origin
Presence of 9th Cypriot pithoi filled with oil and Cypriot pottery and 10 tonnes of copper it is suggested Cyprus is the last port of call for the ship
150 Canaanite Jars of terebinth resin, olives and glass beads are believed to have been acquired at a Syro-Palestinian port
Destination
The amount of LH 11A2-B ceramics in the Aegean indicate a strong Cypriot-Aegean relation
The wreck is located on a clear path to Rhodes and a large amount of Cypriot pottery has been found at the cemetery at Lalysos
Personnel of the ship
Large amount if utilitarian and ornamental cargo on board (such as Aegean spear points)
Pulak argues this is the belongings of a pair of Myceanean’s
While this is still speculative, many of these objects had not been seen beyond the Aegean so we can assume they belonged to individuals with affinity towards the Aegean
Pulak 1998
Original interpretation
Objects on board were marginally believed to belong to an Egyptian delegation and was a diplomatic gesture (Gift exchange)
Hankey (1973) and Cline (1987)
Issues with Gift exchange view
It is incredibly difficult to distinguish between a gift and commodity in the archaeological record - e.g many precious metals were qualified by weight, if they are actually liquid assets how can we be sure they are not a commodity?
Bachuber 2006
New Interpretation
The Ship was on its way to the Aegean, parts of the Cargo was circulating in elite networks and others for non-palatial consumers
The precious cargo would have cultivated prestige and created long term economic and political effects
The Ship was making a voyage of a more commercial nature and reflects how goods travelled around
While gift exchange is possible it is by no means evident
Bachhuber 2006