Mem and Cog exam 3

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 3 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/42

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

43 Terms

1
New cards

deductive reasoning

rigidly structured argumentation which, if accepted, must absolutely be true: from general to specific

2
New cards

Inductive reasoning

structured argumentation (can be rigid but not necessarily) which, if accepted, is probably true : from specific to general

3
New cards

Valid

an argument is __ if the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises

4
New cards

sound

an argument is ___ if it is valid and the premises are true

5
New cards

Modus ponens argument

“If P, then Q'“ “P is true” “Therefore, Q is true” Valid argument, we call P the antecedent and Q the consequent

6
New cards

Modus tollens agrument

P → Q; NOT Q; therefore NOT P: this is denying the consequent, it’s a valid argument

7
New cards

Denying the antecedent

“If I am hungry, I will eat a sandwich; I am not hungry; therefore, I will not eat a sandwich” not valid argument

8
New cards

Affirm the consequent

If I am hungry, I will eat a sandwich

I will eat a sandwich →means → I am hungry

Not a valid argument

9
New cards

motor theory

the systems associated with perceiving and producing speech are closely related; speech perception is innate and species-specific

10
New cards

auditory theory

speech perception is derived from the properties of the auditory system; it is not species-specific

11
New cards

evidence for auditory theory

some data suggests that categorical perception functions in chinchillas similar to humans - not species specific; the place of articulation (ex closed lips or tongue location) of a consonant can be reliably predicted using only the sounds made by the consonant

12
New cards

Well-defined problems

the conditions and aspects of the problem are clearly specified without ambiguities or uncertainties (ex: games, mazed, math problems)

13
New cards

Ill-defined problems

the conditions and aspects are not clearly specified. Ambiguities and uncertainties cloud the paths to the goal (ex attaining a desired career)

14
New cards

Task environment

from Newell and Simon; refers to the objective factors of a problem outside of cognitive processes

15
New cards

problem space

from Newell and Simon; refers to the mental representation of the task environment wherein the problem-solving process occurs

16
New cards

problem state

from Newell and simon; under umbrella of problem space; refers to a past, present, or future state in the problem solving situation

17
New cards

problem operator

from Newell and simon; under umbrella of problem space; refers to the means by which a problem solver can move from one state to another

18
New cards

algorithm

a systematic procedure which is certain to produce a solution to a problem: involves searching all possible problem states to derive a solutions, perfectly reliable but sometimes immensely time-consuming, often intractable for the human mind

19
New cards

Heuristic

a method which can direct a partial search to find pertinent problem state information; more efficient than algorithms, but do not guarantee a solution

20
New cards

functional fixedness

an inability to use objects for purposes other than their intended functions or designs

21
New cards

Normative model

these attempt to predict how humans ought to behave or what would be the most optimal - also called “rational” model

22
New cards

descriptive models

these attempt to predict actual human behavior without regard for what is optimal

23
New cards

Transitivity principle

if A is preferred over B, and B is preferred over C, then A is preferred over C (from normative modeling)

24
New cards

Non-contradiction principle

if A is preferred over B, B is not preferred over A (from normative modeling)

25
New cards

Expected value theory

(ex of normative model) is an early model in economics designed to predict how people determine monetary value (values are calculated by arithmetic)

26
New cards

Expected utility theory

(ex of normative model) followed from the foundation of expected value theory. In this case utility is accounted for, still in calculation

27
New cards

risk-seeking

when a problem is framed in terms of losses, people tend to be more willing to take the gamble/chance

28
New cards

risk-averse

when a problem is framed in terms of gains, people tend to be less willing to take the chances

29
New cards

Prospect theory

describes how people make decisions when presented with alternatives that involve risk, probability, and uncertainty. It holds that people make decisions based on perceived losses or gains.

30
New cards

Regret theory

provides another way researchers have attempted to account for certainty effects

31
New cards

availability Heuristic

the tendency of people to make judgments or decisions based upon what most readily comes to mind

32
New cards

representativeness heuristic

refers to cases in which an event is judged to be more likely if its features or properties are more like its category (ex: who is more likely to struggle with thirst: someone near a lake or desert?)

33
New cards

Anchoring and adjustment

a proposed heuristic by which people make estimates on the basis of some starting or baseline value, and adjust from that point with new information

34
New cards

Optimizing

the most basic approach to a decision with a vast array of choices is to examine every one of them and then select the best option

35
New cards

satisficing

refers to cases in which a decision maker will decline to investigate every single option available.

  • a smaller subset is reviewed instead

  • the best option among them is chosen assuming it is satisfactory even if not the best

36
New cards

Elimination by aspects

a process by which a decision can be reduced to its various components

  • some aspect is considered, and any option not meeting this aspect is eliminated

  • this repeats until all aspects are exhausted and/or one option remains

37
New cards

Affirming the antecedent

also called “modus ponens”, it’s a valid argument. “If I get an A on the test then I will pass the class; I got an A on the test, therefore, I will pass the class”

38
New cards

Denying the consequent

also called “modus tollens”, valid argument. If class is cancelled today, then professor would have notified. The professor did not notify us, therefore, class was not cancelled.

39
New cards

Base-rate neglect fallacy

We don’t know how the base rate of what percentage of people in the tested population have the disease in the first place. The true probability may be a lot lower than expected

40
New cards

Phonemes

refers to the smallest unit of sound in language ex: s(sit), s(shop)

41
New cards

Morphemes

represents the smallest units of meaning in language ex: “-ing” is another morpheme meaning “presently in occurrence”

42
New cards

Chomsky’s universal grammar

believed that humans are endowed with a set of structural rules that are innate

43
New cards

Conjunction Fallacy

a set of two or more specific conclusions is likelier than any single member of that same set, in violation of the laws of probability.