1/36
Miss Pearce Unit 1
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what may influence the topic a researcher chooses?
-personal interests
-political beliefs
-funding
-’hot topics’
Qualitative Data
descriptive
not numerical
written or verbal
(diary entries or interview responses)
Quantitative Data
can be counted
statistically analysed
numbers and figures
(census data, birth rates)
Reliability
extent to which a study can be replicated in the same way
obtaining same results repeatedly makes study reliable
Validity
how well a piece of research measures what it claims to be measuring
how well it reflects the reality it claims to represent
case study
a detailed and in depth study of one particular situation
triangulation
using more than one research method to improve validity of a study
longitudinal study
study that takes place over long period of time
pilot study
small scale preliminary study conducted in order to evaluate feasibility of the key steps in a future full scale project
ethnographies
scientific description of peoples and cultures with their customs, habits and mutual differences
practical issues
access to participants
type of data required
subject matter
sample size
cost/funding
research opportunity
ethical issues
confidentiality
privacy
harm
legality
informed consent
deception
gatekeepers
generalisability
the extent to which the research findings can be applied to the whole target population
demand characteristics
participants change their answers or behaviour to what researcher is wanting to hear or see
social desirability
participants consciously or unconsciously change their behaviour in order to seem more socially acceptable
hawthorne effect
participants knowingly or unknowingly change their behaviour when they are being watched by researcher
positivism
systematic
quantitative (comparative data, more objective)
lab + field experiments, surveys
lacks validity, fixed approaches (does not reflect society)
interpretivism
methodological, insight into individual experience
qualitative (subjective, own opinions)
observation, personal documents (secondary data)
higher in validity, meanings and motivations
difficult to replicate, small scale, unscientific
overt observation
participants know they are being watched
covert observation
participants do not know they are being watched
participant observation
researcher is part of situation being observed and actively engages with people
non participant observation
researcher is not part of situation being observed
example of covert participant observation
tearoom - followed men into everyday lives to see behaviours as to why they have sex in bathrooms with other men
example of overt non- participant observation
ofsted inspectors
example of overt participant
gang leader for a day
joined in with drug gang but no one knew
example of covert non-participant observation
police surveillance
observation practical strengths
flexible
verstehen
observation practical weaknesses
time
cost
reliant on memory
some groups difficult to access
observation ethical strengths
researchers can ensure anonymity
can avoid harm
informed consent possible
avoids deception
observation ethical weaknesses
lack of informed consent in covert
some still feel invasion of privacy
danger to researcher
emotional strain on researcher
observation theoretical strengths
high validity
verstehen
in depth data
access to deviant groups
captures social processes in context
structured interview
questions set in advance
semi structured interview
some questions set in advance
unstructured interview
questions are based on previous response given
group interview
structured or unstructured with more than one participant present
example of unstructured interview
learning to labour
12 working class boys
studied how education prepared working class pupils for the work place
example of semi/unstructured interview
violence against wives
asked about abuse
gave women a voice
researcher could offer support when tackling sensitive topics