1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Temperament
Biologically based individual differences in emotional reactivity & self-regulation that appear early in life
New York Longitudinal Study (Thomas & Chess)
Followed children from infancy into adulthood to study temperament & later outcomes
Activity Level
How physically active a child is
high = constantly moving
low = calm & still
Rhythmicity
Regularity of biological functions like sleep, hunger, & elimination
Approach/Withdrawal
How a child responds to new people or situations
approach = eager
withdrawal = hesitant
Adaptability
How easily a child adjusts to changes in routines or environments
Intensity of Reaction
Strength of emotional responses
high = big reactions
low = mild reactions
Mood
General emotional tone
(positive vs. negative outlook)
Attention Span & Persistence
How long a child can focus & continue a task
Distractibility
How easily attention is disrupted by noise or stimulation
Sensory Threshold
Sensitivity to sensory input
low threshold = easily bothered
high = less sensitive
Easy Temperament
Regular routines
Positive mood
Adaptable
Low intensity
Difficult Temperament
Irregular routines
Intense reactions
Negative mood
Slow to adapt
Slow-to-Warm-Up Temperament
Low activity
Cautious
Slow adaptation
Mild reactions
Goodness of Fit
Match between a child’s temperament & the demands of their environment
ex: a shy child does better with patient, supportive parents than with harsh, rushed parents
Impact of Goodness of Fit
Predicts better emotional regulation, social competence, & fewer behavior problems
Criticism of Thomas & Chess
Study relied heavily on parent reports, which may be biased
Temperament categories may oversimplify continuous traits
How Modern Studies Improve This
Use:
Observational methods
Physiological measures
Larger diverse samples
Jerome Kagan
Studied biological bases of temperament, especially fearfulness & reactivity
High-Reactive (Inhibited)
Infants who react strongly to novelty (newness) more likely to be shy & fearful later
Low-Reactive (Uninhibited)
Infants who show little fear to novelty more likely to be bold & sociable
Stability of Temperament (Kagan)
About 20% of infants remain consistently inhibited over time
Many change with experience
Temperament × Socialization
Parenting style can strengthen or soften inborn temperament traits
Temperament & Risk
Inhibited children have higher risk for anxiety
Uninhibited children have higher risk for behavior problems