1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Political extremes today
Media and activists portray America as divided into two hostile camps, but most Americans are not at the extremes.
Exhausted majority
Moderates who dislike polarization, support compromise, and feel ignored in extreme political debates.
Main trend in tolerance
Americans have become more politically tolerant over the past several decades
1954 political climate
Marked by McCarthyism, loyalty oaths, censorship, discrimination, and widespread intolerance.
Stouffer’s 1954 tolerance study
Found extremely low tolerance for communists, socialists, and atheists; few supported their rights to speak, teach, or publish.
Importance of tolerance
Tolerance of unpopular views is essential for democratic functioning and civil liberties.
Social modernization
Rising education, generational change, and minority empowerment increase tolerance.
Stouffer method
Measures tolerance toward specific groups (communists, atheists, socialists) via rights to speak, teach, and publish.
Content‑controlled method
Measures tolerance toward groups individuals personally dislike; developed to reduce ideological bias.
Expanded tolerance battery
Includes extremist groups on both left and right to avoid ideological skew.
GSS tolerance groups
Communists, atheists, homosexuals, militarists, racists.
Key finding from GSS
Tolerance increased for all five groups from 1976 to 2018
Most dramatic tolerance increase
Homosexuals (+30 overall), especially in allowing them to teach.
Least dramatic tolerance increase
Racists (+3 overall), but still slightly more tolerated over time.
Teaching tolerance trend
Allowing disliked groups to teach shows the largest gains across decades.
Overall tolerance trend
Average tolerant responses rose from <8/15 in 1976 to >10/15 by 2018.
Tolerance and political events
Trends are steady and not strongly affected by events like 9/11 or elections.
Generational differences
Younger generations (especially Millennials) are more tolerant than older cohorts.
Education and tolerance
Higher education strongly increases tolerance; graduate‑educated individuals show highest tolerance.
Cognitive ability
Higher cognitive skills correlate with greater tolerance independent of education.
Duty‑based citizenship
Emphasizes social order and conformity; strongly associated with lower tolerance.
Engaged citizenship
Emphasizes social rights and empathy; slightly increases tolerance.
Engaged citizenship
Emphasizes social rights and empathy; slightly increases tolerance.
Party identification
Once controlling for other factors, partisanship does not significantly predict tolerance.
Main predictors of tolerance
Higher education, higher cognitive ability, younger age, and engaged citizenship norms.
Main predictors of intolerance
Older age and strong duty‑based citizenship norms.
Key chapter takeaway
Despite polarization narratives, Americans have become more tolerant over time due to generational replacement, rising education, and shifting citizenship norms.