1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Microevolution
changes/fluctuations in allele frequencies in a population overtime
bottleneck effect
genetic drift, flow etc.
founder effect
Macroevolution
signficiant changes
population
able to interbred and reproduce healthy, fertile offspring
Gene pool
all alleles of all genes in the population
fixed loci/locus
when all members of the population are the same type of homozygous (ex. all AA or all aa)
Conditions for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
No mutations
Random mating
No natural selection
Extremely large population size
No gene flow
how do allele frequencies change/micrevolution
mutations
Natural selection
Genetic drift
Founder effect
Bottleneck effect
Gene flow
genetic drift
smaller populations are more affected
occurs by chance (ex. human steps on more green than brown bug)
often loose more alleles of 1 type than the other, reducing genetic diversity
founder effect
The founder effect occurs when a few individuals become isolated from a larger population and may develop different alleles
ex. red bug moves from green-red bug land to just red bug land
bottleneck effect
Diverse group → many die/gone → survivors repopulate and change the frequency of certain alleles
genetic flow
movement of alleles, most often via individuals moving ; may cause better/worse fitness because good/bad alleles may be introduced
decreases the differences between populations overtime
relative fitness
contribution an individual makes to the gene pool of the next generation in comparison to other individuals
directional selection
one extreme is being favoured/slowly achieved
disruptive selection
both extremes are being favoured
stabilizing selection
not much change, “middle ground” is favoured
sexual selection
natural selection concerning sexual success
can cause sexual dimorphism
sexual dimorphism
the female and male are different in terms of behavior, looks, etc. for example female birds are boring while male birds are fancy and colorful
intrasexual selection
competition between (usually male) birds for females
females are picky leading to a type of natural selection
good genes hypothesis
allows for those with good genes to be favoured by natural selection
mate choice
the more fancy a male bird the more sexual success but fitness is lowered because easier for predators to find them
genetic variation is preserved how
heterozygote advantage, frequency dependent selection, environment, natural selection etc etc.
frequency-dependent selectin
a phenotype declines if it is too common in a population