1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Cleavage Theory (Lipset & Rokkan)
party systems reflect deep social conflicts (“cleavages”)
Center-Periphery Cleavage
state V. regional/minority identities
Ex.)
Catalona
Scotland
Basque
Flemish nationalism
Bale: minority nationalism emerges where cultural/linguistic groups feel excluded by centralized states
Church-State Cleavage
Religion V. Secular state-building
Historically huge in:
Netherlands
Belgium
Germany
Italy
Rural-Urban Cleavage
Agricultural interests V. industrial/commercial interests
Connected to:
Modernization
Industrialization
Economic transformation
Class Cleavage
Workers V. owners/capital
Probably the most important 20th century cleavage
Produced:
Socialist parties
Labor parties
Unions
Welfare states
Freezing Hypothesis
Party systems “froze” around these cleavages
Social divisions became stable party alignments
Ex.)
Workers vote left,
Religious conservatives vote Christian Democratic.
Etc.
Dealignment
Traditional loyalties weaken
People become:
Less tied to class
Less religious
Less partisan
More volatile voters
Evidence of Party Decline
Secularization = weaker religious parties
Deindustrialization = weaker labor identity
Individualism = weaker collective parties
Globalization = economic insecurity
Media change = weaker party attachment
Deunionization
Ebbinghaus | European Unions face:
Membership erosion
Structural economic change
Labor market flexibilization
Weaker bargaining power
Challenger Parties
They Challenge:
Mainstream elites
Established parties
Consensus politics
Can be:
Radical right
Populist
Anti-establishment
Nationalist
Eurosceptic
Mainstream Party Decline
Bale & Kaltwasser: mainstream center-left and center-right parties have weakened across Europe
Especially: social democratic decline
Why Social-Dems Declined
Traditional worker base shrank
Because
Deindustrialization
Service economies
Globalization
Union decline
Also many center-left parties move toward
Technocracy
Neoliberalism
Moderatoin
This weakened class identity
Rise of Radical Right (Caiani)
Caiani
Economic crisis + refugee crisis created favorable conditions for radical right mobilization
Core radical right themes:
Nationalism
Anti-immigratoin
Welfare chauvinism
Anti-elite politics
Cultural protection
Sovereignty
Local Socio-Cultural Decline (Bolet)
Bolet argues: decline of community institutions creates:
Isolation
Status anxiety
Cultural loss, which can increase radical right support
Example: British pub closures | not just economics but also: identity + belonging
Combines: culture, economics, locality, populism
Economic V. Cultural Explanations
Economic explanation - people support radical right because of:
UE
Inequality
Economic insecurity
Cultural explanation - people react against:
Immigration
Multiculturalism
Social liberalism
Globalization
Protest Politics in Europe (Borbath & Gessler)
Borbath & Gessler - protest has become normalized in Europe
BUT - patterns differ across Europe
Important Regional Difference
Region | Protest tendency |
Northwestern Europe | More left protest |
Eastern Europe | More right protest |
Eastern Europe
After communism, “left” politics often became associated with:
Old communist regimes
Corruption
Authoritarian pasts
Thus, right-wing protest became stronger
Protest Politics
Borbath & Gessler - protest has become normalized in Europe
BUT - patterns differ across Europe
Important Regional Difference
Region | Protest tendency |
Northwestern Europe | More left protest |
Eastern Europe | More right protest |
Dimensions of Resilience (Youngs & Panchulidze)
democratic resilience means: democracy’s ability to resist threats and renew itself
Three Dimensions of Resilience
Type | Meaning |
Institutional | Courts, elections, constitutions |
Societal | Civil society, protest, participation |
Transnational | EU-level protections |
Key Insight
Europe has:
Resisted full autocratization BUT faces major democratic strain
Online Disinformation (Humprecht et al.)
Humprecht et al: countries differ in resilience to disinformation
Factors influencing resilience:
Trust
Media systems
Polarization
Institutional strength
Media literacy
Northern Europe often more resilient than polarized systems
European Distinctiveness (Crepaz)
Crepaz: Europe differs from the U.S. through:
Stronger welfare states
Stronger labor politics
Stronger state role
Social democracy traditions
Cleavage
Durable social division that becomes politically organized and reinforces itself over time
Usually
Identity
Social group
Interests
Organizations
Parties